Tell Me :
Talk
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-11-06 15:37 by blueswithafeeling.
Great version .......
[www.youtube.com]
But this one is better...........
[www.youtube.com]
__________________________
Very nice; I think I left a comment. I really liked the vox.
Thanks, I saw it.
Well, actually I liked it all, but esp, the vox. With many Stones songs IMO it is a question how one will tackle the lead vocals. The songs where Jagger will have done something really affected, or something very Jagger-ish. I thought it was really good that you did them your way.
It's mostly down to the fact it's the only way I can sing... gently.
Do you have a link?
I can upload it on Monday. I have it at work.
Do it. Not rough, in a bad way at all. It's gorgeous.
Wow, that would be great. Really appreciate it!
I thought Mick's singing kind of ruined the 2013 Glastonbury version. The 1989/1990 versions were much better. Although, that dark haired girl with the jiggly jugs were the highlight of the Glastonbury show.
What about the six minute 1990 Barcelona show with Chuck Leavell's finest moment carrying the outro that was unfortunately truncated.
That is the case with other songs as well.
Keith sabotaging Matt's outro in Tokyo is priceless! And they kept Keith high in the mix on the dvd/LP
Matt did the entire outro not Chuck? Is there a video of the Tokyo version?
I was referring to the guitar-synth part Matt always did after the song.
Here it is, sorry about the delay (I had a VERY good reason...). Enjoy the Satanic Sessions!
AND while we're at it, here is the Between The Buttons Sessions.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-04-11 11:53 by DandelionPowderman.
What is the bootleg source for these? Ie, which single bootleg, or is this an evolved online collection? Some of these sound like OOPS or left or right speaker only things.
Nice to have stuff together though.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-04-11 18:44 by His Majesty.
Hope you see this message; I dont have your email anymore. I was hoping to contact you re a question.
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: March 31, 2016 21:32
It is.
Posted by:
blueswithafeeling
()
Date: March 31, 2016 22:04
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-11-06 15:37 by blueswithafeeling.
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
The Sicilian
()
Date: March 31, 2016 22:51
I'm still amazed that 2000 Light Years From Home made the 1989 setlist. The Stones have a habit of taking a great studio song to the stage and butchering it. But this one actually ascended to greater heights. It was brilliant.
I wonder how it made the setlist and who fought to keep it there.
I wonder how it made the setlist and who fought to keep it there.
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: March 31, 2016 23:42
I reckon Mick has a soft spot for it... Much like the album it comes from.
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: March 31, 2016 23:45
Having a go at it at Glastonbury came out of left field, too.
I thought the band did a good job, even though Mick had some problems with his in-ear-monitor.
I thought the band did a good job, even though Mick had some problems with his in-ear-monitor.
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
NICOS
()
Date: April 1, 2016 01:45
Quote
The Sicilian
I'm still amazed that 2000 Light Years From Home made the 1989 setlist. The Stones have a habit of taking a great studio song to the stage and butchering it. But this one actually ascended to greater heights. It was brilliant.
I wonder how it made the setlist and who fought to keep it there.
Great version .......
[www.youtube.com]
But this one is better...........
[www.youtube.com]
__________________________
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
Palace Revolution 2000
()
Date: April 1, 2016 03:30
Quote
His Majesty
It is.
Very nice; I think I left a comment. I really liked the vox.
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
Jayce
()
Date: April 1, 2016 05:40
His Majesty,
Is there still a way to download these sessions? If so, how?
Jayce
Is there still a way to download these sessions? If so, how?
Jayce
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: April 1, 2016 09:12
Quote
Palace Revolution 2000Quote
His Majesty
It is.
Very nice; I think I left a comment. I really liked the vox.
Thanks, I saw it.
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
Palace Revolution 2000
()
Date: April 1, 2016 12:41
Quote
His MajestyQuote
Palace Revolution 2000Quote
His Majesty
It is.
Very nice; I think I left a comment. I really liked the vox.
Thanks, I saw it.
Well, actually I liked it all, but esp, the vox. With many Stones songs IMO it is a question how one will tackle the lead vocals. The songs where Jagger will have done something really affected, or something very Jagger-ish. I thought it was really good that you did them your way.
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: April 1, 2016 15:47
Quote
Palace Revolution 2000
Well, actually I liked it all, but esp, the vox. With many Stones songs IMO it is a question how one will tackle the lead vocals. The songs where Jagger will have done something really affected, or something very Jagger-ish. I thought it was really good that you did them your way.
It's mostly down to the fact it's the only way I can sing... gently.
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: April 1, 2016 15:48
Quote
His MajestyQuote
Palace Revolution 2000
Well, actually I liked it all, but esp, the vox. With many Stones songs IMO it is a question how one will tackle the lead vocals. The songs where Jagger will have done something really affected, or something very Jagger-ish. I thought it was really good that you did them your way.
It's mostly down to the fact it's the only way I can sing... gently.
Do you have a link?
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: April 1, 2016 15:51
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: April 1, 2016 15:55
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: April 1, 2016 21:19
Would you like to have that song on the IORR tribute album (just as it is)?
We have Backstreet Girl and Time Is On My Side. This Lady Jane will complement those beautifully.
We have Backstreet Girl and Time Is On My Side. This Lady Jane will complement those beautifully.
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: April 1, 2016 21:22
Eek, it's a bit rough.
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: April 1, 2016 21:23
Quote
Jayce
His Majesty,
Is there still a way to download these sessions? If so, how?
Jayce
I can upload it on Monday. I have it at work.
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
Palace Revolution 2000
()
Date: April 2, 2016 03:35
Quote
His Majesty
Eek, it's a bit rough.
Do it. Not rough, in a bad way at all. It's gorgeous.
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: April 2, 2016 04:01
Thanks to time is on our side, the words are wrong.
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
Jayce
()
Date: April 2, 2016 06:01
Quote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Jayce
His Majesty,
Is there still a way to download these sessions? If so, how?
Jayce
I can upload it on Monday. I have it at work.
Wow, that would be great. Really appreciate it!
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
The Sicilian
()
Date: April 2, 2016 07:52
Quote
NICOSQuote
The Sicilian
I'm still amazed that 2000 Light Years From Home made the 1989 setlist. The Stones have a habit of taking a great studio song to the stage and butchering it. But this one actually ascended to greater heights. It was brilliant.
I wonder how it made the setlist and who fought to keep it there.
Great version .......
[www.youtube.com]
But this one is better...........
[www.youtube.com]
I thought Mick's singing kind of ruined the 2013 Glastonbury version. The 1989/1990 versions were much better. Although, that dark haired girl with the jiggly jugs were the highlight of the Glastonbury show.
What about the six minute 1990 Barcelona show with Chuck Leavell's finest moment carrying the outro that was unfortunately truncated.
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: April 2, 2016 11:20
Quote
His Majesty
Thanks to time is on our side, the words are wrong.
That is the case with other songs as well.
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: April 2, 2016 11:23
Quote
The SicilianQuote
NICOSQuote
The Sicilian
I'm still amazed that 2000 Light Years From Home made the 1989 setlist. The Stones have a habit of taking a great studio song to the stage and butchering it. But this one actually ascended to greater heights. It was brilliant.
I wonder how it made the setlist and who fought to keep it there.
Great version .......
[www.youtube.com]
But this one is better...........
[www.youtube.com]
I thought Mick's singing kind of ruined the 2013 Glastonbury version. The 1989/1990 versions were much better. Although, that dark haired girl with the jiggly jugs were the highlight of the Glastonbury show.
What about the six minute 1990 Barcelona show with Chuck Leavell's finest moment carrying the outro that was unfortunately truncated.
Keith sabotaging Matt's outro in Tokyo is priceless! And they kept Keith high in the mix on the dvd/LP
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
The Sicilian
()
Date: April 2, 2016 21:43
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Keith sabotaging Matt's outro in Tokyo is priceless! And they kept Keith high in the mix on the dvd/LP
Matt did the entire outro not Chuck? Is there a video of the Tokyo version?
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: April 3, 2016 11:07
Quote
The SicilianQuote
DandelionPowderman
Keith sabotaging Matt's outro in Tokyo is priceless! And they kept Keith high in the mix on the dvd/LP
Matt did the entire outro not Chuck? Is there a video of the Tokyo version?
I was referring to the guitar-synth part Matt always did after the song.
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: April 11, 2016 11:20
Quote
JayceQuote
DandelionPowdermanQuote
Jayce
His Majesty,
Is there still a way to download these sessions? If so, how?
Jayce
I can upload it on Monday. I have it at work.
Wow, that would be great. Really appreciate it!
Here it is, sorry about the delay (I had a VERY good reason...). Enjoy the Satanic Sessions!
AND while we're at it, here is the Between The Buttons Sessions.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-04-11 11:53 by DandelionPowderman.
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: April 11, 2016 18:27
What is the bootleg source for these? Ie, which single bootleg, or is this an evolved online collection? Some of these sound like OOPS or left or right speaker only things.
Nice to have stuff together though.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2016-04-11 18:44 by His Majesty.
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
Palace Revolution 2000
()
Date: April 12, 2016 02:36
Quote
His Majesty
Thanks to time is on our side, the words are wrong.
Hope you see this message; I dont have your email anymore. I was hoping to contact you re a question.
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
Jayce
()
Date: April 12, 2016 04:24
Awesome! Thanks so much!
Re: Where's that joint? - The Satanic Sessions HQ
Posted by:
DandelionPowderman
()
Date: April 12, 2016 10:19
Quote
His Majesty
What is the bootleg source for these? Ie, which single bootleg, or is this an evolved online collection? Some of these sound like OOPS or left or right speaker only things.
Nice to have stuff together though.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
Andrew , BowieStone , ChrisL , cyclist , EddieByword , FloresMuertas , gnillor , JohnnyFormica , keefgotsoul , MisterDDDD , pjb , RaahenTiikeri , retired_dog , rubyeveryday , StonedRambler , Stonesfan2146 , Topi , trm15 , waterrats , Woz , xke38
Guests:
1335
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10