Sorry if this has already been posted but it probably the best first person account of Brian Jones death that I have ever read and I was unable to find an earlier post with a simple search.

I always suspected Frank Thorogood for some reason, not just his deathbed confession that he killed Brian. . This article adds credibilty to that assumption in my opinion, especially the letter from the police files that was finally released after persons involved died.

I copied it from this link: [www.dailymail.co.uk]

RIP Brian peace

Has the riddle of Rolling Stone Brian Jones's death been solved at last?By SCOTT JONES
UPDATED: 17:06 EST, 29 November 2008

Comments (0) Share

..
She was a tall, graceful woman who greeted me with a delicate handshake. As we chatted in her sitting room and she poured tea, I found it difficult to believe that this woman was once at the centre of one of pop's most mysterious deaths.
Janet Lawson was the person who found Rolling Stones star Brian Jones dead at the bottom of his swimming pool on July 2, 1969.
Officially, Jones, aged just 27, drowned while under the influence of drink and drugs. A verdict of death by misadventure was recorded at his inquest.

Golden boy: Brian Jones in his heyday. But by 1969 his taste for drink and drugs had left him often incapable of recording or touring

For almost 40 years, Janet Lawson kept her true identity and story private. But earlier this year, shortly before her death from cancer, she broke her silence and provided me with sworn testimony that threatens to turn the official version on its head.
And my own investigations, accessing previously unpublished police and Public Records Office files, and interviewing officers who worked on the case, reveal serious flaws in the inquiry.
Four decades on from the Brian Jones tragedy, I believe there is finally enough new evidence for the investigation to be reopened.
I became interested in the Brian Jones case a couple of years ago when I found myself near the cemetery where the star is buried.
As a Stones fan, I decided to visit his grave. In the soil next to it was a message from a fan promising to search for the 'truth'.
I was sufficiently intrigued to start some research and, as a journalist and BBC producer, I was soon fascinated by the internet debate surrounding the fateful evening.
Some bloggers claimed that Jones committed suicide, while others believed it was murder.
The more outlandish conspiracy theorists played up the rift between Jones and his bandmates Mick Jagger and Keith Richards at the time of his death, suggesting they might have been involved.
Less than a month before he died, Jones had been sacked from the Stones.
Jones, a middle-class boy from Cheltenham, had formed and named the Rolling Stones in 1962. But by 1969 his appetite for drink and drugs left him often incapable of playing in the studio and he was certainly in no condition to go on the road, despite the fact the Stones had a profitable American tour planned.
The night Jones died, according to the official version of events, there were three guests at his home, Cotchford Farm in Hartfield, East Sussex.
They were Janet Lawson, a 26-year-old nurse who knew the musician through her boyfriend, Rolling Stones tour manager Tom Keylock; Frank Thorogood, 43, Jones's builder-cum-minder; and Anna Wohlin, Jones's girlfriend.
All three gave statements to police within six hours of the death, saying that Jones was drunk or had been drinking. Lawson said he had been taking sleeping tablets.
They all said they independently left the pool and went to separate areas of the house minutes before he drowned alone.
I first made contact with Janet Lawson in the summer of last year. Although she was initially wary of my intentions, gradually we started talking more frequently and she seemed keen to tell her story.

Rock 'n' roll lifestyle: Brian Jones in 1965 with his then girlfriend, model Anita Pallenberg
At the end of our first conversation I asked: 'Do you mind if I call you next week?' Jan, as she called herself, said that would be fine, but then remembered something. 'I'm going into hospital for a few days, nothing really, so best leave it for a week or so,' she said.
That 'nothing really' turned out to be a cancer check. The cancer would prove to be terminal and towards the end of July this year, Jan died peacefully at a hospice close to her home.
When she agreed to tell her story she did not know she was dying - this was no deathbed confession. But as the cancer took hold she took some comfort from finally telling the truth.
'I've done it now,' she said during one of my visits, 'and I feel better for it.'
One of the first things Jan was eager to do was to repudiate her own police statement.
'A pack of lies,' she told me. 'The policeman suggested most of what I said. It was a load of rubbish.'
Hours after Jones's death, Jan had been taken to East Grinstead police station where she gave a statement to Detective Sergeant Peter Hunter, who is now retired.
'The police were trying to put words in my mouth,' Jan told me. 'They kept saying, "Did this happen or did it happen like this?"
'I was very tired, it was about four or five in the morning. I wanted to know if I would be able to give another statement later on because I was tired, confused and nervous.
'They said "Yes", so when the police asked me to give this statement, and they were suggesting all these things to me, I eventually said, "Yeah, yeah," to bring it to a close.
'I thought I would have another chance to give a statement where I could be clearer.'
At the time of Jones's death, Jan had claimed that she was at his house because she had 'decided to spend a few days in the country'. In fact, she told me, her boyfriend Tom Keylock had asked her to go to 'keep an eye on Brian'.
Keylock, who is still alive, was worried about Jones's health and also thought that there was tension between the guitarist and Thorogood.
'Frank was not doing the building work properly,' Jan told me. 'Brian had sacked him that day.
'There was something in the air. Frank was acting strangely, throwing his weight around a bit. In the early evening Frank, Anna, Brian and myself had dinner - steak and kidney pie.'
After eating, the group returned to the garden where Jones and Thorogood larked about in the pool. Later, when Jones was in the pool by himself, he asked Janet to find his asthma inhaler.
'I went to look for it by the pool, in the music room, the reception room and then the kitchen. Frank came in in a lather. His hands were shaking. He was in a terrible state. I thought the worst almost straight away and went to the pool to check.
'When I saw Brian on the bottom of the pool and was calling for help, Frank initially did nothing.
'I shouted for Frank again as I ran towards the house, and he burst out before I reached it, ran to the pool and instantly dived in. But I had not said where Brian was. I thought, "How did he know Brian was at the bottom of the pool?"
'I ran back to the house and tried to call 999 but Anna was on the phone and would not get off it.'
But in her original statement, Janet did not mention the tension between Jones and Thorogood, or the fact that she feared the worst as soon as she saw Thorogood coming in from the pool.
Nor did she reveal how Thorogood initially ignored her cries for help or that he dived into the pool without her telling him that was where Jones was.
Did she think Thorogood had killed Jones?

The band: Brian Jones with fellow Stones Keith Richards, Mick Jagger, Bill Wyman and Charlie Watts in 1968
'Yes. I went into the house to look for Brian's inhaler. Frank jumped back in the pool, did something to Brian and by the time I came back, Brian was lying peacefully on the bottom of the pool with not a ripple in the water.
'I think because of the state that Frank was in, something had to have happened. I mean, why would Frank have been standing in the kitchen absolutely terrified if something hadn't happened?'
Jan believed that Thorogood had not intended to kill Jones but the guitarist's death was probably the result of horseplay that had got out of hand.
PC Albert Evans was the first officer on the scene, arriving at 12.10am on July 3 as ambulance crews tried to resuscitate Jones. He searched the house and took possession of a number of bottles of spirits and various pills.
Now in his late 60s, Evans said his early impression was that there were initially more people around than the three witnesses represented in the official police file. So what did he think had happened?
'Some sort of altercation - drug-induced, alcohol-induced. It was Frank Thorogood who was mentioned - he was the one who had been in the pool with Brian Jones.
'There was nothing at the time to connect Thorogood with any more. Just feelings. I'm sure that Bob Marshall [the chief investigating officer] had those feelings very strongly. I shared these views with him. I think he said exactly the same to me.'
In a private letter to the Sussex Chief Constable in 1994, written by Evans after he was contacted by a journalist, he stated: 'I personally was not convinced that we were given the correct story, as put forward by Thorogood.
'Indeed, I said exactly this to DCI Marshall at the time and he reasonably asked me why I thought so. Along with everyone else, I had no evidence to support my feelings other than the " policeman's instinct", but nevertheless these suspicions have remained with me down the years.'
Evans was not asked to attend Jones's inquest.
Another policeman on the scene in the early hours of July 3 was drugs squad officer PC Mike Harvey. He found five capsules of Durophet, a restricted drug known colloquially as Black Bombers, in Thorogood's coat.
Thorogood told Harvey: 'I look after them for Brian so that he won't take too many at a time.'
In other words, he was in unlawful possession of them. Court proceedings would normally have resulted, but Thorogood was only cautioned.
I tracked down Harvey, who told me: 'A caution was quite unusual in those days. We were trying to stamp down hard on drugs so we couldn't say, "Just forget it," but given the circumstances, it didn't justify court proceedings. That was a decision made by a senior officer.'

The death scene: The swimming pool at Cotchford Farm, East Sussex, where Jones died in 1969. Witnesses said he had been drinking and had also taken sleeping tablets
That officer, according to Harvey, was Bob Marshall. For his part, Marshall said he had no knowledge of the drugs find and was not responsible for the decision to caution Thorogood.
When Harvey met Sussex Chief Constable T. C. Williams at a prearranged interview at 9am that morning, Williams was already aware of the details of the case.
Harvey added: 'He may have had some influence on it, I don't know. He knew Brian Jones was dead and we'd found some drugs in there. He didn't express an opinion but he would no doubt have discussed it.'
Harvey's statement was never presented to the coroner, a fact that surprised retired Detective Inspector Stuart Booth, who during the Eighties and Nineties prepared Sussex Police's response to the media 'every time this case came up'.
'I would expect it to have gone before the coroner and people to have asked Frank Thorogood what drugs he gave to Brian Jones, how many, when, times and dates, where he got the drugs from and did he give any other unlawful drugs to Brian Jones that night, bearing in mind the toxicology report showed there was an unidentified purple spot found on the liver,' said Booth.
He also told me a new file was opened on Jones by Sussex CID in 1983 to prepare a response to a book that claimed Brian was murdered by a gang of men who held him upside down in the pool.
That claim was dismissed by the police but their file contained this statement: 'It is possible that Thorogood was larking about with Jones in the water and Jones subsequently drowned.'
I met another Sussex officer who cannot be named but who knows the case well.
He made claims about how Anna Wohlin's statement had been produced: 'Wohlin had been given sedatives by the doctor and had to be actually woken up during the interview. The WDC who wrote that statement was told what to write by Bob Marshall. Bob Marshall was controlling it, the evidence that was written down. He was pushing the buttons.'
The officer told me a DCI would not 'push the buttons' without an order from above to do so. Marshall says nothing in Wohlin's statement was created or false. He denies manipulating the case or having orders from above to ensure a particular result was achieved.
I mentioned that the Chief Constable knew about the drugs by 9am.
'Chief Constables were and still are political animals,' said the officer. 'If the Chief Constable knew drugs had been found in the house you'd expect him to say, "I want the man charged." Yet Thorogood was cautioned.
'You wouldn't do that unless you knew the Chief Constable was backing you. It was decided this information about the drugs find would not be given to the coroner. It's outrageous.'

The key witness: Janet Lawson broke a 40-year silence just before her death to claim the statement she gave police was a 'pack of lies'
When I telephoned Bob Marshall he insisted: 'It was clear to me within two or three hours of arriving at the scene that this was a tragic accident, a simple drowning.'
Marshall retired in 1974 but he still keeps a detailed file on the case.
In a letter to an author researching a book about Jones in 1991, he wrote: 'On the evening in question he [Jones] was at the farmhouse with some six or so associates, all of whom were entertaining themselves in their own way and with little concern for each other.
'Most, if not all, had been indulging in alcohol and perhaps drugs of some description. This made it difficult to get a precise account of the events of the evening.
'After carrying out what was a very thorough investigation, I was satisfied that this unfortunate death was accidental and at no time did I discover anything to warrant consideration of taking criminal proceedings against any person.'
This letter captures all of Marshall's contradictions. He reveals there were more than three witnesses at the scene. Given that no attempt was made to trace the people who left, this would seem to call into question his claim to have carried out a 'thorough investigation'.
Indeed, there is no evidence anywhere that the witnesses were questioned again when they sobered up. And given that Thorogood was found to be in unlawful possession of drugs, and admitted intending to supply them, there was clearly something to warrant criminal proceedings.
Marshall also told me that Thorogood had 'rambled on he was owed a bit of money by Brian Jones'. This would be a possible motive for an attack.
Marshall also maintained that Thorogood 'was never a suspect - he didn't have it in him to be violent', but his recollection seems to be at odds with the memory of PC Evans, and of Thorogood himself, who admitted on BBC's Crimewatch programme in the Nineties that police had told him they came close to charging him the night Jones died.
When I asked Marshall questions, his line was the same: 'I am satisfied the coroner's verdict was the true and proper one.'
I moved on to DS Hunter, now retired, and said I wanted to run a few things by him. 'I'd rather you didn't,' he replied. 'I'd rather you ran it by Bob Marshall.'
However, Hunter did say: 'If Janet Lawson is saying I physically wrote her statement that is correct, but if she is saying I influenced the content of her statement that is not correct.'
I approached Tom Keylock, now in his mid-80s, but he is in bad health and declined to comment.
In the course of my research I came across a startling and previously unpublished report buried in a police file. It mentioned a murder attempt on Joan Fitzsimons, who had an on-off affair with the married Thorogood.
Fitzsimons drove for her family's taxi firm in Chichester, West Sussex. She had driven Jones and his fellow Rolling Stone Keith Richards and occasionally stayed with Thorogood at Cotchford. She was also friends with Janet Lawson. Indeed, she had introduced Lawson to Tom Keylock.
On July 26, 1969, Fitzsimons, then 29, was the victim of a vicious assault near Chichester which left her in a coma with a fractured skull and blinded for life.
Her boyfriend, Jordanian Michael Ziyadeh, pleaded guilty to attempted murder and spent four years in Broadmoor before being deported.
My initial request under the Freedom of Information Act to see the Sussex Police files on her case was rejected because they contained sexual information that could embarrass living persons. But they were released to me when I provided Fitzsimons's death certificate - she died in 2002.
One letter from the Sussex Chief Constable's office in 1969 read: 'She is to be asked as to her reason for allegedly being afraid of Mr Francis Thorogood as referred to in a statement of her brother Mr John Russell and what knowledge she has relating to the death of Brian Jones which causes her to be frightened.

The prime suspect: Frank Thorogood was sacked by the star on the day of his death and was in a 'terrible state' just before Jones's body was found
'In light of the statement of Mr John Russell enquiries are to be made and statements taken to eliminate Mr Francis Thorogood as being in the Chichester area between 8.30pm and 9.55pm on the 26th July, 1969, and with having anything to do with the assault on Mrs Fitzsimons.'
The crucial four-page statement by John Russell referred to in this letter is missing from the file. I understand that the National Archives sent the file to the Crown Prosecution Service earlier this year.
The CPS wrote to John Russell giving him the opportunity to stop the statement from being released, which he took up. However, the statement was also missing on an earlier occasion when I viewed the file.
A statement from Thorogood said Fitzsimons stayed with Suki Poitier, Jones's ex-girlfriend, at Cotchford Farm for three days after Jones's death because Poitier was upset.
Fitzsimons's mother, Irene Russell, told police that Poitier had left the house about 30 minutes before Jones died - she is therefore another witness not traced by police.
Mrs Russell said: 'Joan told me that Frank was causing trouble by trying to get her back. Frank was very persistent. Frank said to me that Joan knows a lot about the Rolling Stones that shouldn't get out. Joan, as it appeared to me, was frightened of Frank.'
But Thorogood was eliminated as a suspect by Sussex Police after his wife and two friends confirmed he had been in London on July 26. He was never charged with any offences and died in 1993 of cancer.
Despite his guilty plea, Ziyadeh always claimed he did not carry out the attack. The police case against him concluded: 'The motive for this is a mystery.'
Newspapers reported the attack on Fitzsimons. One said that detectives wanted to find out from her whom she drove on the night Jones died and if she was present at Jones's home at any time during the fatal evening.
'The police information is a result of "several interviews" with men, all acquaintances of Mrs Fitzsimons, who talked with her after the death of Jones,' added the newspaper report.
On the same day as the story appeared, Sussex Police released a statement saying: 'There is no truth in those reports whatsoever.'
Janet Lawson told me: 'I was nursing in Hampshire when Joan was attacked, but I saw the headlines in a newspaper. When I saw her injuries, I cried.
'I knew it was no coincidence. I felt there was some link with Frank. I went into hiding at my brother's house on an RAF base. Behind those walls and security fences, that was the only place I had where they couldn't get to me.'
They? 'The Press,' she said. But I sensed Janet was protecting herself from more than just the media. She later dropped out of nursing and even changed her surname to Tallyn.
During my investigation I have found that nearly every official report related to Brian Jones is held under a 75-year rule.
The National Archives, after agreeing to release the files to me, continued to withhold crucial sections. The same reason was given almost every time - to protect living persons from any embarrassment because the files contained details of their sex lives.
Harvey's evidence shows the Sussex Chief Constable in 1969 was briefed fully on the case and knew about the drugs, but it was decided this information would not be passed to the coroner. And police files show the force has continued to involve itself and the DPP in this 'ordinary case of drowning'.

Rolling on: Mick Jagger sings with the Stones in Hyde Park two days after Brian's death
The testimony of PC Evans shows not only did he think that Thorogood had had a fight with Jones resulting in his death, but suggests Bob Marshall, the man leading the investigation, may have initially agreed with him. But following his investigation, Marshall maintains it was a tragic accident, a simple drowning.
If Janet Lawson and the anonymous Sussex Police officer are to be believed, vital details, such as who was present at the time, were not pursued, while the witness statements that were taken played a huge part in supporting the misadventure verdict.
And it is clear from the 470-pages detailing the horrific attack on Joan Fitzsimons that Sussex Police knew there was a possible link between her attack and Jones's death. But the Press reports show this link was actively denied.
Having spent two years studying the evidence and speaking to most of the surviving players, I'm convinced Brian Jones's death was not fully investigated. The only question that remains is why?
I hope this is something the authorities will discover if they finally decide to reopen the case. It is the least Brian Jones deserves


Read more: [www.dailymail.co.uk]

Who cares? Brian won't be back. There's no one to be punished. As far as we know what little family Brian had never requested the case be reopened. This sleeping dog is dead.

Why post that you don't care about the topic?

I'm sure a lot of people reading here would be interested in this.

75 years, eh? That's 2044... Well, some of you will still be around to find out. I'll probably be able to ask Brian in person by then - if either of us still cares.

Interesting article, always worth to read again!

Thank You!

It`s nice to be here, .....

Thanks for posting this article.

Yes - seriously, that's an interesting read and probably as much as we are likely to know about what happened. I'm inclined to believe it was something more than an accident but something short of cold-blooded murder - but like the rest of us, I'm just guessing. I don't see the point of re-opening the case, since in all likelihood there's nobody left to punish. Thanks for posting.

Oh my God! You want me to read all that?

I read this before. But in the end it's another witness who's dead and nobody knows whether all this really happened or was just part of the book promotion.
Btw. the film Stoned had more or less the same story . .



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-06-13 15:24 by CousinC.

Thanks for posting although I don't know what or who to believe.

Quote
CousinC
I read this before. But in the end it's another witness who's dead and nobody knows whether all this really happened or was just part of the book promotion.

Exactly.

Personally, I feel that the investigation should be reopened, even if the suspect(s) are now dead. Retaining an official conclusion of accidental death where there appears to be some evidence of manslaughter, possibly murder, would be an injustice.

I always felt Brian took his own life, however I have to agree that a brutal manslaughter by a brutal thug named Frank is possible.

The idea that the Stones would be after Brian is the kind of typical BS theories that follow bad police investigations. At the same time the band had a conflict with Brian regarding the name "The Rolling Stones" and who knows what else. Maybe Brian kept some tapes since there was a fight between Keith and Brian about some tape. One thing I do believe is that things between Brian and Keith/Mick were a lot uglier than will ever be known and Keith and Mick seem to have kept their mouths shut about this and not just for their own sake but also Brian. Just a hunch.

Quote
Father Ted
Personally, I feel that the investigation should be reopened, even if the suspect(s) are now dead. Retaining an official conclusion of accidental death where there appears to be some evidence of manslaughter, possibly murder, would be an injustice.

Well said Father Ted. Regardless of whether Brian's family wants the case opened, I personally like to see truth and justice prevail in the end. After all Brian was the man who started it all for us Stones fans, and truth and justice is what our countries are supposed to be built around.

tatters, it's a good read don't be intimidated by the article's lenght, it goes too quickly for me, I just want more. peace

I want to know what the connection is between some untold sexual acts and Brians' death...was Frank gay and had a love/hate thing for Brian?? Did he really kill him and then when he realized he'd actually done the deed, he freaked out? So many possibilities...I would love to see the case reopened...curious minds want to know.I just wonder what the police have been hiding all these years...they KNOW Frank was a thug.

Quote
mickschix
I want to know what the connection is between some untold sexual acts and Brians' death...was Frank gay and had a love/hate thing for Brian??

What?

Quote
tonterapi

Quote
mickschix
I want to know what the connection is between some untold sexual acts and Brians' death...was Frank gay and had a love/hate thing for Brian??

What?

I would think that during hours of questioning about an unexplained death, many lurid details would emerge.

TONTERAPI, there was a reference to sexual acts at Brians' home, I'm guessing..it was in the article posted here...did you read all of it? And yes, Lee, I think you're right. Who knows what weird things were brought out..or fabricated!!

Janet Lawson and Tom Keylock on July 3, 1969 at Cotchford. They were rumored to be close......... Keylock said Thorogood confessed to him (Keylock) on his deathbed. Thorogood's daughter said he didn't. She waited a looooong time to tell her story.

nice gams!

Quote
Marie
Janet Lawson and Tom Keylock on July 3, 1969 at Cotchford. They were rumored to be close......... Keylock said Thorogood confessed to him (Keylock) on his deathbed. Thorogood's daughter said he didn't. She waited a looooong time to tell her story.

I never knew these pics existed.

Quote
mickschix
TONTERAPI, there was a reference to sexual acts at Brians' home, I'm guessing..it was in the article posted here...did you read all of it? And yes, Lee, I think you're right. Who knows what weird things were brought out..or fabricated!!

Now I've had time to read it all. Not easy to get the time with two kids running around.

It's a bit bizarre to use the sexual content as an excuse for keeping it from being released. I mean the only one left in life now is Anna and it was 39 years ago in 2008. 75 years!? 2044!

The "sexual acts" makes me think of the movie Stoned with all the "games" between Brian and Anna and Frank. Horrible movie by the way.

Has anyone else read the book by Terry Rawlings? He had his own spin on this. He claims he was there on the night of BJ's death.

I have not read Anna Wohlin's book - she was hustled out of the country and warned not to speak to anyone.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-06-14 18:22 by Bliss.

Wouldn't you think that someone, a journalist or just someone with real curiosity, would make it their mission to find Anna and try to get the real story.From just the monetary standpoint alone, to get an exclusive on this would be such a coup!! Where's Chris Epting!?? He should do this!! This whole thing has been so poorly handled right from the start. Someone knows where Anna lives now....

Quote
mickschix
Wouldn't you think that someone, a journalist or just someone with real curiosity, would make it their mission to find Anna and try to get the real story.From just the monetary standpoint alone, to get an exclusive on this would be such a coup!! Where's Chris Epting!?? He should do this!! This whole thing has been so poorly handled right from the start. Someone knows where Anna lives now....

I know where in Sweden she lives and I doubt Im the only one here.

Yes, she has a clothing boutique in Sweden and has written a book about Brian (2001, republished under a different name in 2006), where presumably she has told what she knows.

[www.amazon.com]

This is from an Amazon review of the book:

The book describes the author's romantic relationship with Jones during the last few months of his life, although interesting Wohlin does have a habit of repeating her self and painting too much of a rosy picture of their life together. The book finds a better pace as it approaches the events surrounding the "murder", which she attributes to Frank Thorogood, a builder who was hired by the Stones management to renovate Jones recently aquired farm house. Another reviewer intelligently says that you have to read between the lines to see the real truth and I would agree, and equally when it comes to Wohlin's involvement. She expresses how she felt scared and intimidated, fearing that if she told anyone that she believed Jones was murdered she too would meet the same fate. She very effectively depicts the isolated lonely position she was in being "alone in a foreign country" griefstricken and intimidated and this combined with what she perceived as genuine threats from Throgood is why she has presumably not spoken sooner. We are left with the suggestion of a huge conspiracy surrounding the death involving the Rolling Stones Inc who go to great lengths to stop Wohlin from talking, even offering her £100,000 to keep quiet, begging the question "why?" - after all, the Stones had nothing to gain from Jones' death - did they?

Eventually some time after the inquest, Wohlin finds the courage to tell the police that she is convinced Brian Jones was murdered, they agree something is amiss but advise her for her own wellbeing to leave things as they stand.
Taken to its logical conclusion this is a harrowing story of deceit, foul play, corruption and murder. Well done Anna for finding the courage to write it, perhaps your next book could fill in the blanks."



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2012-06-14 18:06 by Bliss.

Anna has changed her story a few times about what happened. She had only been at Cotchford a couple of weeks when Brian died. Her book reads like a romance novel. Terry Rawlings could have written a good book, but there are too many inaccuracies. In the appendix, though, are copies of the coroner's report, etc. Janet Lawson and Keylock were romantically linked at one time. Keylock said Thorogood confessed on his deathbed. Rawlings, along with others, have their doubts. Sam Cutler believes Keylock was involved. A big mess...... Most people believe it was a tragic accident. The weirdness was afterwards. Keylock burned all Brian's clothes, etc. Brian's house was ranshacked.

I believe that Thorogood did kill Brian - I always thought it was due to aggressive horseplay caused by Brian firing him earlier in the day. But according to the reviewer I quoted above, Anna Wohlin claims that the RS org offered her £100,000 to keep quiet. If this is not true, they could sue her for libel - they are alive and well and have a legal team on call. So this puts a different spin on it - that Thorogood (or someone) did kill Brian, at the behest of the RS org - Mick and Keith - possibly over the use of the RS name. But even if Anna did witness Thorogood killing Brian, she would not have been privy to any behind-the-scenes discussions about it.

Quote
Bliss
I have not read Anna Wohlin's book - she was hustled out of the country and warned not to speak to anyone.

Why so much cloak & dagger stuff around this sad event? Like in the Daily Mail article above, Janet said she was so frightened "they" would get her, she went into hiding on a flippin' RAF base! Geez. Frank Thorogood was just a lone, inept contractor/handy man, not the Cosa Nostra or the C.I.A.