Quotejazzbass How about Mother's Little Helper? Not played live since '66. With the Stones not likely to ever play it again, this isn't too bad...
Forum: Tell Me

Quoteelectricmud When Springsteen came up the Stones have had two careers behind. Springsteen will do it when he is 70, like Macca. But they can change the members in the band. So it`s easy when Macca has a fresh rock-sound with these young and flahy guitarists. So can Springsteen do in a few years. But doing it with the original members is different. We are fortunate that our band is showing the
Forum: Tell Me

You mean something like this?
Forum: Tell Me

Quoteloog droog Speaking of 3/4's of the Beatles, when the first Anthology CD came out, with "Free As A Bird," I recall seeing of photo of Paul, George, and Ringo...with Jeff Lynne, right in there as if he were subbing for John. May Pang's Instamatic Karma book has a snapshot of John and Paul in '74 (or early '75), the only post-Beatles shot that I've seen of the two together. Th
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteStonesTod Quotecamper88 Can't agree with #3. How long is a new album? 45-50 minutes? How long is a concert 2-2.5 hours? Play the new stuff, particularly if its been released in 2003 and you're touring in 2006-07. I saw Neil Young do Greendale solo acoustic in 2003 at The Hammersmith Apollo and it was great. Did he push his audience? Sure, but we got to hear something that only a fe
Forum: Tell Me

Nice article, Chris!
Forum: Tell Me

Quotesonomastone QuoteJah Paul Quotesonomastone QuoteNICOS Beatles LIVE after 1966...........they would fit well in 2013 Lol.... I always loved how they went out of their way to show anyone paying attention that they were lip synching. Although they're miming to the instrumental track, it's live vocals (for the most part) on the Revolution promo video - check out Paul and George's backing vo
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteNICOS QuoteJah Paul Quotesonomastone QuoteNICOS Beatles LIVE after 1966...........they would fit well in 2013 Lol.... I always loved how they went out of their way to show anyone paying attention that they were lip synching. Although they're miming to the instrumental track, it's live vocals (for the most part) on the Revolution promo video - check out Paul and George's backing vocals,
Forum: Tell Me

Quotesonomastone QuoteNICOS Beatles LIVE after 1966...........they would fit well in 2013 Lol.... I always loved how they went out of their way to show anyone paying attention that they were lip synching. Although they're miming to the instrumental track, it's live vocals (for the most part) on the Revolution promo video - check out Paul and George's backing vocals, borrowed from the slow ve
Forum: Tell Me

Great story, Rosalita. My cousin saw them twice - 1964 at the Hollywood Bowl and 1966 at Dodger Stadium...she still talks about those shows today! She was also a big Elvis fan and saw him several times - my very cool cousin!
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteDoomandGloom QuoteJah Paul Quotestonesrule Jah Paul, do you remember how relatively peaceful and beautiful that stretch of Pacific Coast Highway was! I used to regualarly beg my mother to let me stay home from school and take me along PCH to Malibu. Another serene spot then. That was quite an interesting scene at the Lawford house. It was a beautiful stretch there...used to pass by th
Forum: Tell Me

Quotestonesrule Jah Paul, do you remember how relatively peaceful and beautiful that stretch of Pacific Coast Highway was! I used to regualarly beg my mother to let me stay home from school and take me along PCH to Malibu. Another serene spot then. That was quite an interesting scene at the Lawford house. It was a beautiful stretch there...used to pass by there often on the way to Santa Mo
Forum: Tell Me

Quotestonesrule Some of what you posted is quite accurate but your take on Lennon is not quite how it was. I know for a fact, because I knew John and had some great conversations with him in the mid-seventies about Mick and the band generally. He respected them, considered Mick a real friend. It was not about competition. Too long to go into, especially here in Hater-land. I will say (an
Forum: Tell Me

Quotestonehearted Quoteryanpow Ive heard that their very early gigs were pretty wild and rock'n rollin'. Here is that show in full, which is introduced at the outset by Paul Drew himself, who helped juice up their sound for this show. You can hear Paul McCartney comment at one point to the audience (before their third song) on the sound (at 7:10) "Thank you very much, everybody! Thank you
Forum: Tell Me

Quotestonehearted QuoteSingle Malt Quotestonehearted QuoteCanYouHearTheMusic In 1989-90 as well as classic tours like 72 and 81-82 they played pretty much the same set every night. No one seemed to complain then! No one complained then because they had whole new albums for each of those tours where several new songs would be played and would be welcomed by fans because they were good, many of
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteThrylan I saw them here, in Parkersburg WV in about 87'......it was laughable! A concert of medleys, great! I dont know if they played anything start to finish, forgetable. The only medley they would have been playing in '87 was a brief "car songs" medley - everything else was full songs, start to finish.
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteRstones24 Quotecamper88 QuoteRstones24 Here is a link to the setlists from every Paul McCartney show. . . . Yes, he changes it up every tour . . . Wait, what? He changes it up? Every tour? And he's approaching 40 songs a night? Yeah, I'd take that deal from the Stones. Mind you, changes maybe 20%-25% of his concerts. Believe me...the classic songs are ALWAYS playe
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteGasLightStreet Quotelougio Every great band over the years has written songs that don't belong in their catalog. Emotional Rescue is one of those songs. It doesn't fit the mold of a blues/rock band and never has. These songs came from a period when Mick spent to much time in the basement of Studio 54 getting ripped. How can they justify playing this on their 50 year anniversary tour when son
Forum: Tell Me

Forum: Tell Me

QuoteThrylan Does he ever do E street shuffle anymore? He did when I saw him in Anaheim back in December.
Forum: Tell Me

Concert For Bangladesh - August 1971
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteOneHit That video of CYHMK is unbelievable. Great sound, good camera work and awesome performance. I wonder what Mick said to Keith at 7:08 - it didn't seem nasty/todger-related. Take a bow, MT, just fantastic. My only wish is that they'd bring Bobby into the centre of the stage! Sway is very good also, I'd love the outro solo to be even longer! Great performance, still my favourite guita
Forum: Tell Me

In my 30 years of attending concerts, the only time my ears truly hurt was during The Who's Quadrophenia concert at the Honda Center in Anaheim (then known as the Arrowhead Pond) way back in 1996...was near the front and it was just too loud. Had ringing similar to yours for a couple of days, but then it went away. As others have advised, see a doc this week if you can if it doesn't get better.
Forum: Tell Me

Quotemickschix OK, so I just broke down and bought an awesome seat for Boston...and here's the big question. Do you all think that the level they're playing at now, complete w/ 4 Mick Taylor songs, will stay this way, if not improve even more...or, will they get lazy? Will they cut MT down to 2 songs again? I bought that ticket based on reviews from that last incredible show! What do you think?
Forum: Tell Me

Never been a big fan of the studio version of GOMC...too sing-songy to my ears. The live versions from 66-67, however, are a different story - faster and more rockin' - great stuff!
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteDoomandGloom QuoteJah Paul QuoteDoomandGloom QuoteGRNRBITW QuoteDoomandGloom insistence that the audience needs 2 hours of high-energy rock is the problem. They're old, we're old there's no reason at this very late stage why we all need to pretend otherwise. This is a brilliant observation but it's easier to play fast and loud than it is to play softly. what a damned moment here....am i
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteDoomandGloom QuoteGRNRBITW QuoteDoomandGloom insistence that the audience needs 2 hours of high-energy rock is the problem. They're old, we're old there's no reason at this very late stage why we all need to pretend otherwise. This is a brilliant observation but it's easier to play fast and loud than it is to play softly. what a damned moment here....am i to understand that you believe t
Forum: Tell Me

Much like Bruce and Dylan (plus McCartney and a few others), they would have had to establish the precedent years ago...it's not something they can just do overnight. They chose a safe path and decided not to challenge their audiences ever since '89 and with all subsequent tours.
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteJumpinJackOLantern QuoteJah Paul QuoteJumpinJackOLantern QuoteThru and Thru Now there's a setlist I'd pay big bucks to hear them play! And to think it could be so easily done. Not so easily. But it could be done, right? For it to be done now, the band would have needed to have a different approach to their setlists beginning way back in '89 and on each subsequent tour...instead, the
Forum: Tell Me

QuoteJumpinJackOLantern QuoteThru and Thru Now there's a setlist I'd pay big bucks to hear them play! And to think it could be so easily done. Not so easily.
Forum: Tell Me