Re: Keith Richards Clean Electric Solo on Wild Horses Studio
Date: January 10, 2008 14:46
How did Pearl Jam (great band indeed) get into the discussion?
OpenG:
if you actually listen to the outtakes you will easily understand how differently keith and taylor develop a guitar part. At the end of the day what matters is that they both recorded some great final takes.
keith follows his instict, he completely immedesiamtes himself in the tonal / musical context of the piece of music he is creating, he focuses on sounds (timbre of instruments, overtones of particular bends or double stops etc.), rythms, notes in the context of the of the song. All of the above MAY sound a complete mess but makes sense to HIM. As I said, the results are always brillant.
Have you ever noticed how many diverse (in style, rythm, sound, impact on the song etc.) solos Keith has recorded? So many and so diverse one from the other that most listeners wouldn't bet a penny that they are performed by keith.
That is his way of doing things.
On the other hand, MT developed his melodies starting from scales and given patterns. That is why his first takes sound good. Because if you play some smart lick from the correct scale, and you add that monster vibrato and sublime touch, it cannot sound bad! But his best solos are much more than that. If you analyze better, you will notice that also MT takes his time to develop his lines. At the beginning he comes up with some ideas, that is all. All the rest is just pre-canned (wonderful) licks. Comparing live takes of the same song as the tour porgreses gives a clear idea of what I mean. There is a very long way between the solo in Hyde Park's Devil and Ya Ya's version- The same goes for his studio works. All the stones (including MT) rehearsed all parts ad nauseam ...
C