Tell Me :
Talk
yes but they have also lost golden tate, sidney rice, walter thurmond, michael robinson and brandon browner. not easy to replace such a huge loss on both sides of the ball. check this out. per espn
The Jets are ranked 32nd in passing offense, averaging only 185 yards per game, virtually the same as the Seahawks (186 yards).
All the way down on I-5 to LA
That might be more laughable than the Saints losing to the Lions!
Might being the key word. NFC South SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WOW!
Just awful! Seattle sucks too! What a bizarre year so far!
no lie brees is doing ok but this is exactly how he was in SD now that his weapons are either gone or banged up. plays pretty well but just barely better than average
hahahahaha
Is that straight up or the point spread? The game is in New Orleans. Home field is certainly a factor. I took NO on my pick em sheets. Hopefully it will be a good game on Sunday night. Last Sunday's dismantling of Santa Clara was pretty boring.
this makes it even easier for the broncos to win
I don't know. A friend heard it on sportsradio and texted me. Regardless it's bizarre. The Saints will lose at home this year and I'm leaning towards the first loss this Sunday night. You don't have the luxury of home field advantage when you're 2-4 and playing a 5-2 team.
Unless they do what they did against Detroit for the first 3 quarters for 4 quarters... but that's a stretch.
Something is very wrong with the Saints this year. Aside from resigning Jimmy Graham and getting rid of Jenkins and Sproles and Moore. And it could be THE MOST PATHETIC division in history at the end of the season with the 'winning' team being... 6-10? That's probably whack but you never know.
California Egg Council are big supporters!
It's sad to watch. The Raiders were my favorite team before the Seahawks existed. Hopefully they will be back. Carr looks like he has potential. Think they are a few years away though.
Hawks 27 Kitty Cats 13. GO HAWKS!
Being a Carolina & Seattle Fan, also RW went to my alma mater (WolfPack) this proves a tough choice - Not really - I can't lose!!
RW is the man! He's our best hope. Enjoy the game!
I'm expecting a gem of a game - BTW I love watching these games at 10 A.M. West Coast isn't that bad at all!!!
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
keefriffhard4life
()
Date: October 19, 2014 06:32
Quote
crholmstromQuote
GasLightStreet
Looks like the Seahawks will have a very difficult time repeating next year...
We'll see. They made it to the Super Bowl last year without much contribution from Harvin. Time to unleash the Beast!>
yes but they have also lost golden tate, sidney rice, walter thurmond, michael robinson and brandon browner. not easy to replace such a huge loss on both sides of the ball. check this out. per espn
The Jets are ranked 32nd in passing offense, averaging only 185 yards per game, virtually the same as the Seahawks (186 yards).
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
leteyer
()
Date: October 19, 2014 15:40
Quote
MKjan
The Oakland Raiders are going all the way this year.
All the way down on I-5 to LA
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
GasLightStreet
()
Date: October 19, 2014 16:47
A possibly interesting game in Detroit today. Who will lose more pathetically? I'm leaning more towards the Saints going 6-10 this season than my original thought, which was a highly laughable 3-13. The way things are going that might be enough to 'win' the division.
The idea of these teams like the Seahawks and Saints and whoever else never losing at home is pure crap - they will lose at home, they do lose at home, they have lost at home.
I'm seeing a minimum of 3 home losses for the Saints this season. And I wish the debacle of playoff scenarios would hurry up and happen because some people truly think the Saints have a shot due to the NFC South being one of the worst divisions this year.
Even if the Saints magically make the playoffs and if they 'win' the division like Seattle did a couple years back they'll host a game and... lose.
The idea of these teams like the Seahawks and Saints and whoever else never losing at home is pure crap - they will lose at home, they do lose at home, they have lost at home.
I'm seeing a minimum of 3 home losses for the Saints this season. And I wish the debacle of playoff scenarios would hurry up and happen because some people truly think the Saints have a shot due to the NFC South being one of the worst divisions this year.
Even if the Saints magically make the playoffs and if they 'win' the division like Seattle did a couple years back they'll host a game and... lose.
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
crholmstrom
()
Date: October 19, 2014 17:11
I think winning the division counts & would feel that way even if it worked against my team. Take the 2 divisions just talked about. The NFC West is way tougher than the NFC South. The division games make up more than a third of a team's schedule & thus should be given credence, IMHO. When New Orleans lost to Seattle in the playoffs the first time, they were a wildcard team. If they had won their own division they would've hosted a game but they didn't. Thems the breaks & the rules. What bothers me more is the way the NFL assigns bye weeks. It is entirely arbitrary & driven by nothing other than the TV contracts. Week 4 had 6 teams with byes & some subsequent weeks only had 2 teams off. The logic is elusive. To be fair, I think they should do it by division, with a random drawing determining the order. That way no team in a division would have an advantage. Even if you were unlucky enough to draw an early bye, every other team in your division would be operating under the same conditions. & 4 teams off a week seems very workable for the TV networks. I will admit that the last week bye worked well for the Hawks last year. The 1st week bye this year, not so much. I had the same opinion last year. Just a thought. GO HAWKS!!!!!
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
GasLightStreet
()
Date: October 19, 2014 17:55
The issue I have is rewarding losers. The year Seattle 'won' their division two teams in the NFC (Tampa, NYG) finished 10-6 and missed the playoffs.
If it was seeded correctly - conference ranking by points - division winners wouldn't automatically place in the playoffs.
It's simply pathetic. I know thems the rules. Some rules are FUCKINGTSTUPID!
If it was seeded correctly - conference ranking by points - division winners wouldn't automatically place in the playoffs.
It's simply pathetic. I know thems the rules. Some rules are FUCKINGTSTUPID!
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
DGA35
()
Date: October 20, 2014 00:49
Can't believe Seattle lost to the Rams! Meanwhile my Bears continue to suck, especially at home. After looking so good against Atlanta last week they play one of their worst games of the year.
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
GasLightStreet
()
Date: October 20, 2014 04:27
Quote
DGA35
Can't believe Seattle lost to the Rams! Meanwhile my Bears continue to suck, especially at home. After looking so good against Atlanta last week they play one of their worst games of the year.
That might be more laughable than the Saints losing to the Lions!
Might being the key word. NFC South SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WOW!
Just awful! Seattle sucks too! What a bizarre year so far!
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
keefriffhard4life
()
Date: October 20, 2014 05:40
seattle shouldn't have gotten rid of the guy who opens the field up for the other guys
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
keefriffhard4life
()
Date: October 20, 2014 06:14
Quote
GasLightStreetQuote
DGA35
Can't believe Seattle lost to the Rams! Meanwhile my Bears continue to suck, especially at home. After looking so good against Atlanta last week they play one of their worst games of the year.
That might be more laughable than the Saints losing to the Lions!
Might being the key word. NFC South SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WOW!
Just awful! Seattle sucks too! What a bizarre year so far!
no lie brees is doing ok but this is exactly how he was in SD now that his weapons are either gone or banged up. plays pretty well but just barely better than average
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
crholmstrom
()
Date: October 20, 2014 10:42
Do your worst. Seahawks were pretty horrible. Not giving up on the season yet, as we have a stretch where we can get better real quick. Carolina, Oakland, NYG & KC (not so much on KC). They better. There were a few positive things. I'm not going to whine about the call at the end. They should've never been in that position in the first place.
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
Chris Fountain
()
Date: October 21, 2014 12:51
Quote
crholmstrom
Do your worst. Seahawks were pretty horrible. Not giving up on the season yet, as we have a stretch where we can get better real quick. Carolina, Oakland, NYG & KC (not so much on KC). They better. There were a few positive things. I'm not going to whine about the call at the end. They should've never been in that position in the first place.[/quot
It was a bizzare weekend of football. The NFL field is wide open at this point.
I'm not a Notre Dame fan but the way that game ended is sorta fishy.
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
crholmstrom
()
Date: October 21, 2014 14:01
Quote
Chris FountainQuote
crholmstrom
Do your worst. Seahawks were pretty horrible. Not giving up on the season yet, as we have a stretch where we can get better real quick. Carolina, Oakland, NYG & KC (not so much on KC). They better. There were a few positive things. I'm not going to whine about the call at the end. They should've never been in that position in the first place.[/quot
It was a bizzare weekend of football. The NFL field is wide open at this point.
I'm not a Notre Dame fan but the way that game ended is sorta fishy.
I've been doing pretty well on NFL pick em contests. I was 12 & 3 this weekend. Maybe time for a Vegas pilgrimage...
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
Chris Fountain
()
Date: October 21, 2014 16:00
Quote
crholmstromQuote
Chris FountainQuote
crholmstrom
Do your worst. Seahawks were pretty horrible. Not giving up on the season yet, as we have a stretch where we can get better real quick. Carolina, Oakland, NYG & KC (not so much on KC). They better. There were a few positive things. I'm not going to whine about the call at the end. They should've never been in that position in the first place.[/quot
It was a bizzare weekend of football. The NFL field is wide open at this point.
I'm not a Notre Dame fan but the way that game ended is sorta fishy.
I've been doing pretty well on NFL pick em contests. I was 12 & 3 this weekend. Maybe time for a Vegas pilgrimage...
Mavbe I should hop over there too. I'm working on a project in Irvine of the Great Socialist State of California
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
crholmstrom
()
Date: October 22, 2014 10:49
Quote
Natlanta
the humanity.
hahahahaha
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
GasLightStreet
()
Date: October 23, 2014 02:57
Vegas has the Saints over the Packers.
WTF!!??
WTF!!??
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
crholmstrom
()
Date: October 23, 2014 09:59
Quote
GasLightStreet
Vegas has the Saints over the Packers.
WTF!!??
Is that straight up or the point spread? The game is in New Orleans. Home field is certainly a factor. I took NO on my pick em sheets. Hopefully it will be a good game on Sunday night. Last Sunday's dismantling of Santa Clara was pretty boring.
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
keefriffhard4life
()
Date: October 23, 2014 10:02
Quote
crholmstromQuote
GasLightStreet
Vegas has the Saints over the Packers.
WTF!!??
Is that straight up or the point spread? The game is in New Orleans. Home field is certainly a factor. I took NO on my pick em sheets. Hopefully it will be a good game on Sunday night. Last Sunday's dismantling of Santa Clara was pretty boring.
this makes it even easier for the broncos to win
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
GasLightStreet
()
Date: October 23, 2014 17:46
Quote
crholmstromQuote
GasLightStreet
Vegas has the Saints over the Packers.
WTF!!??
Is that straight up or the point spread? The game is in New Orleans. Home field is certainly a factor. I took NO on my pick em sheets. Hopefully it will be a good game on Sunday night. Last Sunday's dismantling of Santa Clara was pretty boring.
I don't know. A friend heard it on sportsradio and texted me. Regardless it's bizarre. The Saints will lose at home this year and I'm leaning towards the first loss this Sunday night. You don't have the luxury of home field advantage when you're 2-4 and playing a 5-2 team.
Unless they do what they did against Detroit for the first 3 quarters for 4 quarters... but that's a stretch.
Something is very wrong with the Saints this year. Aside from resigning Jimmy Graham and getting rid of Jenkins and Sproles and Moore. And it could be THE MOST PATHETIC division in history at the end of the season with the 'winning' team being... 6-10? That's probably whack but you never know.
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
GasLightStreet
()
Date: October 24, 2014 15:58
Jacksonville has the least! HA HA!
Somehow Oakland has a decent following.
Somehow Oakland has a decent following.
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
crholmstrom
()
Date: October 24, 2014 17:37
Quote
GasLightStreet
Jacksonville has the least! HA HA!
Somehow Oakland has a decent following.
California Egg Council are big supporters!
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
crholmstrom
()
Date: October 26, 2014 14:56
Kind of liking this concept of game starting at 6:30 AM Pacific. Will be interesting to see what the ratings are like. GO HAWKS!
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
MKjan
()
Date: October 26, 2014 15:01
Oakland is on it's way to a perfect record.
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
crholmstrom
()
Date: October 26, 2014 15:37
Quote
MKjan
Oakland is on it's way to a perfect record.
It's sad to watch. The Raiders were my favorite team before the Seahawks existed. Hopefully they will be back. Carr looks like he has potential. Think they are a few years away though.
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
Chris Fountain
()
Date: October 26, 2014 18:41
Incredible finish to the Detroit-Atlanta game in London. Can't wait for the Seattle -Carolina game. It will be intense!!!
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
crholmstrom
()
Date: October 26, 2014 18:49
Quote
Chris Fountain
Incredible finish to the Detroit-Atlanta game in London. Can't wait for the Seattle -Carolina game. It will be intense!!!
Hawks 27 Kitty Cats 13. GO HAWKS!
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
Chris Fountain
()
Date: October 26, 2014 18:54
Quote
crholmstromQuote
Chris Fountain
Incredible finish to the Detroit-Atlanta game in London. Can't wait for the Seattle -Carolina game. It will be intense!!!
Hawks 27 Kitty Cats 13. GO HAWKS!
Being a Carolina & Seattle Fan, also RW went to my alma mater (WolfPack) this proves a tough choice - Not really - I can't lose!!
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
crholmstrom
()
Date: October 26, 2014 18:58
Quote
Chris FountainQuote
crholmstromQuote
Chris Fountain
Incredible finish to the Detroit-Atlanta game in London. Can't wait for the Seattle -Carolina game. It will be intense!!!
Hawks 27 Kitty Cats 13. GO HAWKS!
Being a Carolina & Seattle Fan, also RW went to my alma mater (WolfPack) this proves a tough choice - Not really - I can't lose!!
RW is the man! He's our best hope. Enjoy the game!
Re: OT: NFL 2014
Posted by:
Chris Fountain
()
Date: October 26, 2014 19:02
Quote
crholmstromQuote
Chris FountainQuote
crholmstromQuote
Chris Fountain
Incredible finish to the Detroit-Atlanta game in London. Can't wait for the Seattle -Carolina game. It will be intense!!!
Hawks 27 Kitty Cats 13. GO HAWKS!
Being a Carolina & Seattle Fan, also RW went to my alma mater (WolfPack) this proves a tough choice - Not really - I can't lose!!
RW is the man! He's our best hope. Enjoy the game!
I'm expecting a gem of a game - BTW I love watching these games at 10 A.M. West Coast isn't that bad at all!!!
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
Guests:
1672
Record Number of Users:
206
on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests:
9627
on January 2, 2024 23:10