Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Date: November 29, 2012 21:21

Is he not helping w/ this mini tour?

Thanks.

Stones.

Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Posted by: tumbled ()
Date: November 29, 2012 21:23

Michael Cohl is not doing this tour. He thought he was but he was sadly mistaken. Richard Branson the rich guy with the island is doing promotion thus = ticket price fiasco imo



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-11-29 21:23 by tumbled.

Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Posted by: runrudolph ()
Date: November 29, 2012 21:26

Quote
steel driving hammer
Is he not helping w/ this mini tour?

Thanks.

Stones.

hahaa
you are out of control
jeroen

sorry mate

Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Posted by: uhbuhgullayew ()
Date: November 29, 2012 22:52

Quote
tumbled
Michael Cohl is not doing this tour. He thought he was but he was sadly mistaken. Richard Branson the rich guy with the island is doing promotion thus = ticket price fiasco imo


Any additional info on this?

Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Date: November 29, 2012 22:58

Quote
uhbuhgullayew
Quote
tumbled
Michael Cohl is not doing this tour. He thought he was but he was sadly mistaken. Richard Branson the rich guy with the island is doing promotion thus = ticket price fiasco imo


Any additional info on this?

I'd like to know this too, thanks.

Stones.

Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Posted by: tumbled ()
Date: November 29, 2012 23:01

Quote
steel driving hammer
Quote
uhbuhgullayew
Quote
tumbled
Michael Cohl is not doing this tour. He thought he was but he was sadly mistaken. Richard Branson the rich guy with the island is doing promotion thus = ticket price fiasco imo


Any additional info on this?

I'd like to know this too, thanks.

Stones.

from the papers I read that Michael Cohl sued some associated company on the grounds that he was EXPECTING TO BE the STONES PROMOTER On the NEXT TOUR and exptected moneys forthcoming and the judge and I guess the stones (I conjecture) were like like no. you had no expectations, get off of my cloud.

in a nutshell. then cohl lost money on his broadway show. I don't know a lot of it.

Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Posted by: tumbled ()
Date: November 29, 2012 23:02

delete duplicate.

I'm out of control


billboard: [www.billboard.biz]



Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2012-11-29 23:05 by tumbled.

Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Posted by: uhbuhgullayew ()
Date: November 29, 2012 23:46

Quote
tumbled

billboard: [www.billboard.biz]


Interesting that the article was from JAN 2011 & it states that Cohl was trying to put a tour together for last year.

If Keith wasn't able to play, it wouldn't have mattered what Cohl wanted to do.

Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Posted by: TomGreen ()
Date: November 29, 2012 23:57

I thought I read they parted company with him and then maybe re-kindled.

Either way I can't stand the way he orchgestrates the tours. although prices have been a disgrace for these shows, I think they will come down generally, without him.

The 100+ shows every tour in North America while the rest of the world gets breadcrumbs always pissed me off big time.

Who did introduce them anyway, it didn't sound like Branson?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-11-29 23:58 by TomGreen.

Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Posted by: tumbled ()
Date: November 30, 2012 00:10

Branson has a partner. I forget his name. Anwyay it looks like Cohl fell out of favor, which I wouldn't blame the stones for getting them into some litigation makes people not want to get involved in stuff like that.

Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Posted by: njlstones815 ()
Date: November 30, 2012 00:49

Richard Branson and Paul Dainty from Australia!

Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Posted by: GumbootCloggeroo ()
Date: November 30, 2012 01:52

I will be very disappointed if Whoopi Goldberg doesn't introduce The Stones at the Brooklyn show.

Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Date: November 30, 2012 02:31

Quote
GumbootCloggeroo
I will be very disappointed if Whoopi Goldberg doesn't introduce The Stones at the Brooklyn show.

LOL, Obama should introduce them in NY...

He perfers them over the Beatles too btw...

Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Posted by: Title5Take1 ()
Date: November 30, 2012 08:43

The Stones had already cut Cohl a break I think he didn't deserve. Bill German relates in UNDER THEIR THUMB that for some shows Michael Cohl tacked on an arbitrary tax/fee on every ticket, including Stones' shows. The resultant millions went straight into Cohl's pocket and no one else's. It was totally fraudulent, and after he was caught, Bill was shocked the Stones agreed to do another tour with Cohl. Someone—Jann Wenner? I forget—told him, "The Stones don't care." Maybe they should have.

Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Posted by: Monkeytonkman ()
Date: November 30, 2012 12:29

Quote
TomGreen
I thought I read they parted company with him and then maybe re-kindled.

Either way I can't stand the way he orchgestrates the tours. although prices have been a disgrace for these shows, I think they will come down generally, without him.

The 100+ shows every tour in North America while the rest of the world gets breadcrumbs always pissed me off big time.

Who did introduce them anyway, it didn't sound like Branson?[/[/b]quote]

ME!!!

\m/


Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Posted by: GravityBoy ()
Date: November 30, 2012 14:12

Why doesn't Michael Caine introduce the Rolling Stones?


Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Date: November 30, 2012 18:28

Maul PcCartney should introduce them in NY and finally show some respect to the Stones.

Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Posted by: tumbled ()
Date: November 30, 2012 19:05

The stones washed their hands of live nation and cohl too. so they bashed their heads together for no reason.

Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Posted by: Title5Take1 ()
Date: November 30, 2012 19:17

When I saw the Stones at the Joint (at the Hard Rock Hotel) Michael Cohl walked right past me just outside the entrance doors. But Peter Morton (who founded the Hard Rock chain) actually introduced the Stones on stage. (This was the 40 Licks tour.)

Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Posted by: uhbuhgullayew ()
Date: November 30, 2012 19:23

Quote
steel driving hammer
Maul PcCartney should introduce them in NY and finally show some respect to the Stones.


He could be the first of the two warm-up acts on the next tour.

Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Date: November 30, 2012 19:25

Quote
uhbuhgullayew
Quote
steel driving hammer
Maul PcCartney should introduce them in NY and finally show some respect to the Stones.


He could be the first of the two warm-up acts on the next tour.

He should but his head is WAY too big for that.

But yes, he should finally admit and show some respect for the boys.

Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Date: November 30, 2012 19:29

Michael Cohl...spinning smiley sticking its tongue out


Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Posted by: runrudolph ()
Date: November 30, 2012 19:55

Jagger told him to f...off
jeroen

Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Posted by: Naturalust ()
Date: November 30, 2012 20:01

Because he was on some tropical island spending some of the money he made off the last Stones tour. Keep that guy out of stones business, spread the opportunity around a bit. peace

Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Posted by: Munichhilton ()
Date: November 30, 2012 20:08

The obvious answer is because the Stones met at Dartford station some 50 years ago...no need for Cohl to introduce them.

Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Posted by: GravityBoy ()
Date: November 30, 2012 21:40

Mick always introduces himself... he's a man of wealth and taste.

Re: Why didn't Michael Cohl introduce the Stones in London?
Posted by: uhbuhgullayew ()
Date: November 30, 2012 21:41

Quote
steel driving hammer
Michael Cohl...spinning smiley sticking its tongue out


Looks like Tommy Chong back in the day.




Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 2456
Record Number of Users: 206 on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests: 9627 on January 2, 2024 23:10

Previous page Next page First page IORR home