Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

Goto Page: Previous1234Next
Current Page: 2 of 4
Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: ohcarol ()
Date: October 13, 2012 01:24

Keith has been mailing it in for the last twenty years....

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: Rolling Hansie ()
Date: October 13, 2012 01:30

Thanks Halup. You said it very well

-------------------
Keep On Rolling smoking smiley

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: Halup ()
Date: October 13, 2012 01:34

Quote
Justin
Quote
Halup
Kirk Hammett of Metallica waited in line at an autograph show in L.A. to have Don knotts sign his Mr Limpitt movie psoter.

That is awesome. Were you there to see it?

I wasn't but a friend was there and saw Kirk standing in the line like everyone else at the Hollywood Show in Burbank.

A friend of mine just had Ron Blair sign his Tom Petty Runnin' Down a Dream book and Ron told him he has his own copy that he had his bandmates sign.

It's interesting seeing what musicians are good about signing versus those who are not. McCartney is a good signer, considering his stature. I once waited in a line of about 50 people while Paul signed 1 each for everyone in that line. Paul used to wait by the artist entry at a theater in Liverpool when he was young and get people to sign autographs, so he gets it. There's a photo of John Lennon standing right next to Gene Vincent as Gene is signing autographs. so I assume John got one. David Gilmour, on the other hand, has said in interviews that he doesn't understand autographs, so no surprise, he isn't very good about signing them.

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: Justin ()
Date: October 13, 2012 01:38

Quote
Halup
Quote
Justin
Quote
Halup
Kirk Hammett of Metallica waited in line at an autograph show in L.A. to have Don knotts sign his Mr Limpitt movie psoter.

That is awesome. Were you there to see it?

I wasn't but a friend was there and saw Kirk standing in the line like everyone else at the Hollywood Show in Burbank.

It's interesting seeing what musicians are good about signing versus those who are not. McCartney is a good signer, considering his stature. I once waited in a line of about 50 people while Paul signed 1 each for everyone in that line. Paul used to wait by the artist entry at a theater in Liverpool when he was young and get people to sign autographs, so he gets it. There's a photo of John Lennon standing right next to Gene Vincent as Gene is signing autographs. so I assume John got one. David Gilmour, on the other hand, has said in interviews that he doesn't understand autographs, so no surprise, he isn't very good about signing them.

Very nice. I go to the Hollywood Show whenever someone of interest is scheduled to appear. I moved out to LA 2007...a year after the great Don Knotts passed and I understand he was at that show at least once a year if not every one of them. I would've been first in line to meet him...brilliant comedic actor.

I'm envious of your Paul story. I waited all day (literally) outside the Capitol Building in Hollywood earlier this year when he was there to perform "Kisses On The Bottom" for a webcast. Finally at 10pm, one of his guards comes out and picks 5 random people out of the 70 people waiting out there to go behind the gate and recieve an autograph. I was not one of them. I was bummed...but mainly physically exhausted from waiting out there all damn day.

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: Max'sKansasCity ()
Date: October 13, 2012 01:51

Quote
Rolling Hansie
Thanks Halup. You said it very well
I'll second those thanks... although...

Glad it made sense to you Hans, I still dont get it.
A signed one of kind piece of artwork is one thing, a (possible fake) signed mass produced album is another. I dont see how a mass produced item being signed makes it any better.

But I appreciate the efforts to explain, and if it makes sense to some, then that is worth the answer. As for me, I still wouldnt wait 5 seconds, or pay 5 cents, for someone to sign something... I dont know what I would do with it.... Although I am happy to sign my autograph for others is they want it... but I dont understand it.

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: Max'sKansasCity ()
Date: October 13, 2012 01:52

Quote
Halup
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
I never understood autographs anyway... who cares? Why?

I have asked many times and I have never heard of one good reason why autographs are cool. I sometimes hang out with somewhat famous people and their more famous friends (of course I dont drop their names like some around here) and never in a million years would I ask one of them or their famous friends for an autograph when we are just hanging around... why would I? Why would anyone?... what would it mean? who cares? Do people do that so they can show it to someone? and then?... so what?... it is probably fake (they think) but even if it is real... who cares?... it means what? That someone mooched someone famous to sign their name... and that means what? Tell me what I am missing and maybe I will start collecting them like albums and posters and shirts (which imuho are artwork themselves... to be held, worn, framed, hung and admired)

I can only think of a one example, and that would be when an artist signs their painting (or another one of a kind type of artwork) as a time when I would want someone to sign something.

One key to understanding is in your last sentence. You say that you would want a painting when an artist is signing it. If you expand the idea of an artist being more than painters and use it to refer to musicians, writers, actors or anyone who works in the arts as being an artist, there you go.

A painter can sign the visual thing they created, but as a musician creates sound, how can they sign that? The closest thing they can do is sign the cover of a record which is the visual representation of the art that they created (the music contained within), and as you admitted, are already artwork in themselves. By having a musician sign the LP, it essentially creates an exhanced version of their album and a much more rare and unique looking item.

Most of us here on this site collect all sorts of variations on Stones albums and memorabilia and from many other artists. We already have the collector mentality. Some people want many different copies of the same album in teir collection, including pressings from around the world, even though they are essentially the same. By having an autographed copy of an album, you are now owning an even more rare and exclusive copy of it. For some people, having copies of the same album with different catalog numbers feeds into their desire to collect and that's good enough for them. For others, they like to have a copy of an artists work signed by the artist in their collection. I don't think one is right and one is wrong. They both are silly and cool in their own ways.

I have a huge amount of autographed items in my collection, almost all of which I have obtained in person. Is it a silly hobby? Sure, it's crazy, but as a big music and film lover, I've been able to meet so many people I never would have dreamed I would otherwise have met. To be able to meet a person like Keith Richards and have a chance to say a few words to him and have an autograph as a lasting moment of these encounters is great and it makes my record collection more unique.

I guess the answer is that an autograph can mean different things to different people. Some like it for the visual enhancement of an item that they can put up on the wall, the same way someone would put up a signed painting. For others it is a simple momento from an encounter with someone whose work they like.

I can fully understand that if you are hanging out with famous people, where you wouldn't have a desire to have them autograph something for you. Even if you wanted it, it would be awkward to ask.

I find it interesting when famous people collect autographs. Johnny Ramone was a big collector of memorabilia and would write to musicians and actors for their autograph. Kirk Hammett of Metallica waited in line at an autograph show in L.A. to have Don knotts sign his Mr Limpitt movie psoter. Paul McCartney, when he performed at the Bridge School concert in 2004, went from dressing room to dressing room to have all of the artists on the bill sign his poster for the concert.

Thank you for your reply smiling smiley

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: Max'sKansasCity ()
Date: October 13, 2012 01:59

Quote
Halup


....I find it interesting when famous people collect autographs......

I find it highly amusing when famous people, whom I have personally heard complain not really complain.. more just blather a bit about about how they dont like all the extra attention or picture/autograph seekers... BUT then the same person will get all excited when they see/encounter someone (supposedly)(its all relative) more famous than them.... and they act the same way which they blathered about... and.... I have learned (the hard way) that it is probably best to not point such things out... Honesty like that sometimes doesnt go over well... because... you know... it was different in that instance.... sure it waswinking smiley.



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 2012-10-13 02:07 by Max'sKansasCity.

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: Halup ()
Date: October 13, 2012 02:11

Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Quote
Halup


....I find it interesting when famous people collect autographs......

I find it highly amusing when famous people, whom I have personally heard complain not really complain.. more just blather a bit about about how they dont like all the extra attention or picture/autograph seekers... BUT then the same person will get all excited when they see/encounter someone more famous than them.... and they act the same way which they blathered about... and.... I have learned (the hard way) that it is probably best to not point such things out... Honesty like that sometimes doesnt go over well... because... you know... it was different in that instance.... sure it waswinking smiley.

I have seen this to a certain degree as well. Most entertainers had someone that was their inspiration to getting into whatever work they do and when they meet them, they turn into a fan like the rest of us.

I attended a screening of Slumdog Millionaire when it came out and it had a QandA following with Danny Boyle. After it ended there were about 20 people waiting afterwards to meet Danny and say some words to him or have him sign something. Everyone waited patiently for their chance, then this one girl introduced herself to him and said "Hi, I'm Drew". It was Drew Barrymore, who was meeting him for the first time and telling him how much she likes his work. She was going on like a normal fan. He told her he would tell his daughter he met her, as she's a big fan fo her films.

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: Max'sKansasCity ()
Date: October 13, 2012 02:28

Quote
Halup
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Quote
Halup


....I find it interesting when famous people collect autographs......

I find it highly amusing when famous people, whom I have personally heard complain not really complain.. more just blather a bit about about how they dont like all the extra attention or picture/autograph seekers... BUT then the same person will get all excited when they see/encounter someone more famous than them.... and they act the same way which they blathered about... and.... I have learned (the hard way) that it is probably best to not point such things out... Honesty like that sometimes doesnt go over well... because... you know... it was different in that instance.... sure it waswinking smiley.

I have seen this to a certain degree as well. Most entertainers had someone that was their inspiration to getting into whatever work they do and when they meet them, they turn into a fan like the rest of us.

I attended a screening of Slumdog Millionaire when it came out and it had a QandA following with Danny Boyle. After it ended there were about 20 people waiting afterwards to meet Danny and say some words to him or have him sign something. Everyone waited patiently for their chance, then this one girl introduced herself to him and said "Hi, I'm Drew". It was Drew Barrymore, who was meeting him for the first time and telling him how much she likes his work. She was going on like a normal fan. He told her he would tell his daughter he met her, as she's a big fan fo her films.
grinning smiley Great story... I admire Drew.... She is awesome... and I bet very easy going and down to Earth... or at least she portrays that quite well.

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: Halup ()
Date: October 13, 2012 02:29

Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Quote
Rolling Hansie
Thanks Halup. You said it very well
I'll second those thanks... although...

Glad it made sense to you Hans, I still dont get it.
A signed one of kind piece of artwork is one thing, a (possible fake) signed mass produced album is another. I dont see how a mass produced item being signed makes it any better.

Please explain why a signed one of a kind piece of artwork has some appeal to you Would that same piece of artwork has the exact same appeal to you if it was unsigned versus signed?

Anything that is a possible fake, of course, is worthless and some people are plain stupid to part with cash for that.

When I met Keith Richards in 2005 there were just 2 of us waiting. My friend and I were each able to get a photo op with Keith and about 3 items signed each. Keith was as nice as could be in the short time we had together and we had a short conversation about what later was released as A Bigger Bang. Whenever I look at the signatures I got that night from him, it brings back great memories of that night. It's a great story I can tell people as well.

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: Justin ()
Date: October 13, 2012 02:37

Halup---please post your Keith photo and signatures!

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: Max'sKansasCity ()
Date: October 13, 2012 02:47

Quote
Halup
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Quote
Rolling Hansie
Thanks Halup. You said it very well
I'll second those thanks... although...

Glad it made sense to you Hans, I still dont get it.
A signed one of kind piece of artwork is one thing, a (possible fake) signed mass produced album is another. I dont see how a mass produced item being signed makes it any better.

Please explain why a signed one of a kind piece of artwork has some appeal to you Would that same piece of artwork has the exact same appeal to you if it was unsigned versus signed?
The signature is not what appeals to me... it is the art itself. I meant that ONLY when dealing with one of kind piece would a signature mean much to me... Because the artist finishes the piece and then signs it... versus being forced to sit down and cramp up his/her hand having to sign 500 copies... It is not the signature that I value on a one of a kind, it is just usually part of the deal. I dont see the signature itself meaning/proving much. Then again I am no ba-zillionaire high end art collector... if I was I would probably feel differently.

Please dont misunderstand... I am not one of these types that judges others to be stupid or dumb for liking anything... be it liking a type of woman, or art or collecting photos or autographs... heck they can even sit out all night waiting to see a movie or buy an new i-phone.... more power to them... I am just curious about the why??... and for all I know I am wrong.... and will someday I will realize it...

Im just saying as of today, I dont get it.. I dont get why a friend of mine once paid over $500.00 for a (probably fake) Jimi Hendrix signature on a blank piece of paper... it makes no sense to me.... but hey... more power to them if it makes them happy.

I guess I am just saying when I read story about someone getting screwed on a fake signanture that I am happy that (for once) I am immune to them screwing me like that... but... I am sure they will find another way to screw me winking smiley



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 2012-10-13 02:58 by Max'sKansasCity.

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: Honestman ()
Date: October 13, 2012 03:05

Quote
NICOS

Nicos, why did you always post some dirty drawings winking smiley

HMN

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: Max'sKansasCity ()
Date: October 13, 2012 03:24

Quote
NICOS
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Quote
NICOS
It would be stupid in 2012 that autographed devices make signature that all looks the same, technically it´s easy to make one that make little differences in signatures.
Great point... It would seem that is would be easy to vary it all slightly from signing to signing... vary the size, vary the spacing, very the pen pressure, very the ink flow... why not?


What Lurks In Handwriting



I worked in applied acoustics for a number of years, and this idea occurred to me one day while driving home. I don't believe that it is particularly practical, unless there were some special conditions, but it might be the basis for a good story.

The thought is this: when you write with a pen or pencil on paper, that writing device is acting like a microphone, picking up vibrations in the air, and recording them in the trace left on the paper. This, after all, is the principle by which the phonograph worked. The problem of course is that the trace is very faint, and the signal (the words you actually are writing) is all over the place when examined under a microscope.

A pen held in a hand while writing (with no acoustic signal present) probably has a fairly simple dynamics. As it moves over the paper, the unevenness of the paper will cause some deviation from a completely straight edge. Adding an acoustic signal should cause further deviations from the intended path of the pen. (If I make a 1/4 inch pen stroke, it seems to take about 1/10 of a second; for a 1000 Hz sine wave signal, this would mean 100 peaks, with each peak having a separation of .0025 inches - this seems like a reasonable trace to detect.) Modeling what the pen would do due to the irregular surface of the paper, and measuring what it actually did in order to find the difference due to the acoustic influence might still be quite hard.

But if it worked! Imagine listening to the room during the moment John Hancock signed the Declaration of Independence. Or any of a number of other historical events that took place when someone was writing.

Could it work? The acoustic energy is low, but it is there. The problem is in the analysis. One would have to build a mathematical model of the pen used, the ink, and even the paper (the threads of which would cause natural oscillations). Then, this model would be used to identify the parts of the writing (the edges) which were unexpected - these would be where acoustic information was.

While this seems almost impossible, and it might be, I would expect that the mathematical model for a hand holding a pen, moving over a known but rough surface, might be pretty simple - containing a few parameters no doubt, but the basic spring-like nature of the problem, the relatively simple abstraction of a pen (described by several moments of inertia), might be basic. It also might be such that all of these parameters could be learned by examining the entirety of the writing, either statistically or in detail.

Stepping back, while I'm not sure we could use this technique to hear the voice of George Washington or Napoleon, it might be used to verify that a particular document was written in a particular environment. Did Lincoln write the Gettysburg Address while on the train? I think that's a myth, but if it weren't, I expect it could be tested - the vibrations on trains, especially of his time, were sufficiently large to leave traces detectable to the human eye (as I've verified on Amtrak frequently).

(First idea: 1988; on this web page, December 16, 2002)

By the way this article is not by me ...just downloaded from the INet

I had to read this 2-3 times to get "IT"... but the "IT" is somewhat amazing, if they can ever get "IT" work. And if they ever do make "IT" to work... then indeed signatures are more valaubale than I thought. Thanks for posting NICOS



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-10-13 03:25 by Max'sKansasCity.

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: EddieByword ()
Date: October 13, 2012 03:31

Quote
Justin
Quote
paulm
I'm not surprised by these accounts. Are you?

I read an account once of a guy asking Keith to sign his Tele, on the streets of NYC. Keith and bodyguard ducked into their taxi/limo and drove off with dude's guitar. I don't know where I read this, but I don't doubt it. These guys are ruthless conquerors of the rock world. Show your true colors guys!

If you're going to be a Debbie Downer all over the board...at least get the story right.

A fan had a guitar he wanted Keith to sign. As Keith walked past, the fan stuck the guitar out and Keith and/or his bodyguards grabbed the guitar and took it with them inside their car. The fan chased after the car screaming that he wanted his guitar back...at a red light, the window rolled down and Keith was laughing because he thought the fan was GIVING him the guitar. Keith was happy to return the guitar back.

A little less dramatic than your version of the story, eh?

I heard a differnt one again, yes he did give the guitar back but the reason he took it in the first place (in this version) was because he didn't like the guy who "just had dollar signs in his eyes" at the prospect of getting Keith's signature,,,,,,,,,,so............guitar back but no signature...........and Keith had a laugh at his expense

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: Max'sKansasCity ()
Date: October 13, 2012 03:37

Sounds like that mastercard TV ad....

guitar back but no signature......LUCKY!
Keith had a laugh at his expense.... PRICELESS!!

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: EddieByword ()
Date: October 13, 2012 03:43

Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Sounds like that mastercard TV ad....

guitar back but no signature......LUCKY!
Keith had a laugh at his expense.... PRICELESS!!

COL.........chuckling out loud..............cool smiley

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: Max'sKansasCity ()
Date: October 13, 2012 03:48

Quote
EddieByword
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Sounds like that mastercard TV ad....

guitar back but no signature......LUCKY!
Keith had a laugh at his expense.... PRICELESS!!

COL.........chuckling out loud..............cool smiley
smileys with beer

Eddie, I think your version is correctest.
I remember the part about eyes with Dollars signs

This scene must make into a movie at some point..
the guy running down the street after the limo screaming HEEEEEY!!! MY GUITAR!!
That stuff is just too good not to.



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-10-13 03:49 by Max'sKansasCity.

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: RRMan03 ()
Date: October 13, 2012 04:00

And you think this is news. How many celebs do you know. Almost everybody uses auto pen or signers. They do not have the time or the want to sign all day and night. Common knowledge inside the business.

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: trainarollin ()
Date: October 13, 2012 04:22

Here is a closeup of the autopen signature.


Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: EddieByword ()
Date: October 13, 2012 04:47

Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Quote
EddieByword
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Sounds like that mastercard TV ad....

guitar back but no signature......LUCKY!
Keith had a laugh at his expense.... PRICELESS!!

COL.........chuckling out loud..............cool smiley
smileys with beer

Eddie, I think your version is correctest.
I remember the part about eyes with Dollars signs

This scene must make into a movie at some point..
the guy running down the street after the limo screaming HEEEEEY!!! MY GUITAR!!
That stuff is just too good not to.

I'm fairly sure I heard that from a Keith interview...........can't remember when or where though..........

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: Max'sKansasCity ()
Date: October 13, 2012 04:50

Quote
EddieByword
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Quote
EddieByword
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
Sounds like that mastercard TV ad....

guitar back but no signature......LUCKY!
Keith had a laugh at his expense.... PRICELESS!!

COL.........chuckling out loud..............cool smiley
smileys with beer

Eddie, I think your version is correctest.
I remember the part about eyes with Dollars signs

This scene must make into a movie at some point..
the guy running down the street after the limo screaming HEEEEEY!!! MY GUITAR!!
That stuff is just too good not to.

I'm fairly sure I heard that from a Keith interview...........can't remember when or where though..........

I remember envisoning something like this when I heard it...




Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-10-13 04:51 by Max'sKansasCity.

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: Justin ()
Date: October 13, 2012 05:29

Quote
trainarollin
Here is a closeup of the autopen signature.


Did you have a feeling it was autopen when you recieved it? No doubt you noticed the dots at the tips of the letters...it would've slipped past me. Now that I've seen this, it does make me take note so I don't get fooled myself....

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: trainarollin ()
Date: October 13, 2012 06:06

I felt it was autopen as soon as I saw it.

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: stonesrule ()
Date: October 13, 2012 07:23

Keith has been paid more than seven million dollars for "Life."
There's a management issue when the "star" and his website promise something that is not honestly delivered. I'm very sad to hear about this.

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: letitloose ()
Date: October 13, 2012 10:59

Quote
Max'sKansasCity
I never understood autographs anyway... who cares? Why?

I have asked many times and I have never heard of one good reason why autographs are cool. I sometimes hang out with somewhat famous people and their more famous friends (of course I dont drop their names like some around here) and never in a million years would I ask one of them or their famous friends for an autograph when we are just hanging around... why would I? Why would anyone?... what would it mean? who cares? Do people do that so they can show it to someone? and then?... so what?... it is probably fake (they think) but even if it is real... who cares?... it means what? That someone mooched someone famous to sign their name... and that means what? Tell me what I am missing and maybe I will start collecting them like albums and posters and shirts (which imuho are artwork themselves... to be held, worn, framed, hung and admired)

You're so cool Max. I wish I was in your gang, with all your famous friends, drinking Pina Coladas on the rocks. The reason riff raff like us want autographs is because it brings us closer to the cats that make the music. of course they are only great if you get them in person, or there is a story to tell.

I do understand this company and their invention... it makes sense in this day and age of marketing that this company wants its mailers to appear personal... and hand written might do that. "Hand written" might get that unsolicited marketing letter opened by 3 out of a 1000 versus only 2 of a 1000...... but as far as a signed book... who cares? Why is that cool? Please understand I am not bashing on the OP, I asppreciate the shared story, I amjust asking... why are autographs cool?

I can only think of a one example, and that would be when an artist signs their painting (or another one of a kind type of artwork) as a time when I would want someone to sign something.

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: steffiestones ()
Date: October 13, 2012 11:03

I wonder if the exclusive signed edition also autopen, here is my copy..trainarollin?


Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: Max'sKansasCity ()
Date: October 13, 2012 11:08

Quote
letitloose
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
I never understood autographs anyway... who cares? Why?

I have asked many times and I have never heard of one good reason why autographs are cool. I sometimes hang out with somewhat famous people and their more famous friends (of course I dont drop their names like some around here) and never in a million years would I ask one of them or their famous friends for an autograph when we are just hanging around... why would I? Why would anyone?... what would it mean? who cares? Do people do that so they can show it to someone? and then?... so what?... it is probably fake (they think) but even if it is real... who cares?... it means what? That someone mooched someone famous to sign their name... and that means what? Tell me what I am missing and maybe I will start collecting them like albums and posters and shirts (which imuho are artwork themselves... to be held, worn, framed, hung and admired)

I do understand this company and their invention... it makes sense in this day and age of marketing that this company wants its mailers to appear personal... and hand written might do that. "Hand written" might get that unsolicited marketing letter opened by 3 out of a 1000 versus only 2 of a 1000...... but as far as a signed book... who cares? Why is that cool? Please understand I am not bashing on the OP, I appreciate the shared story, I am just asking... why are autographs cool?

I can only think of a one example, and that would be when an artist signs their painting (or another one of a kind type of artwork) as a time when I would want someone to sign something.
You're so cool Max. I wish I was in your gang, with all your famous friends, drinking Pina Coladas on the rocks. The reason riff raff like us want autographs is because it brings us closer to the cats that make the music. of course they are only great if you get them in person, or there is a story to tell.
Ok... but I would just assume have a Stoli or Patrón than a pina colasida, if that is OK...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-10-13 11:48 by Max'sKansasCity.

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: Rolling Hansie ()
Date: October 13, 2012 11:15

Quote
trainarollin
Well, it was made official yesterday when I had 2 certified document examiners over to my place

And how does this make it official ?

-------------------
Keep On Rolling smoking smiley

Re: Keith Richards web sold Books were 100% Autopen signed.
Posted by: Green Lady ()
Date: October 13, 2012 12:12

I absolutely do not know why anyone would want to buy an autograph - except maybe
1) The attraction of having something that your idol has actually touched, like a relic of a saint
or 2) The commercial added value of the thing.

I can see that you might like to have one as a souvenir of an actual meeting - and for me it would be the meeting, not the autograph, that would be important. Asking for an autograph is a kind of legitimate reason for talking to someone famous who you wouldn't otherwise have any excuse for bothering - the scribble on the book or the bit of paper is neither here nor there. So yes, I'd get my book signed so that I could talk to the author - but I'd be just as happy to have the chat without the autograph.

I'm with Max here - I don't really "get" autographs.

Goto Page: Previous1234Next
Current Page: 2 of 4


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 1845
Record Number of Users: 206 on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests: 9627 on January 2, 2024 23:10

Previous page Next page First page IORR home