I'm sitting down this morning with Lynn Goldsmith, Bob Gruen, Henry Diltz, Norman Seeff and several other rock photogs, all with good Stones history - I plan on covering Stones matters, if you have any questions, leave them here in the next few hours and i'll see how it goes...



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-06-20 17:29 by hbwriter.

Thanks, but can you please change the thread title. I am not kidding this time. You really scared the shit out of me.

Keep On Rolling

That's cool!
Of course I only can come up with the obvious questions, like "What specifically did you want
to capture in your picture, when having to shoot the Stones and how easy/hard was it to shoot
exactly that?"
.
.
.

I want to get lost in your rock 'n roll and drift away

Quote
Rolling Hansie
Thanks, but can you please change the thread title. I am not kidding this time. You really scared the shit out of me.

Oh geez...

You could ask Bob Gruen whether there are any plans,chances or at least interest for a
book beside this sold out and high expensive "Crossfire Hurricane" one published by Genesis concering the Stones.

Remember Ethan Russells "Let It Bleed" book which was published at a reasonable price couple of years ago,although in a different size...

Thank you.

How's Keith?

ask if a picture paints a thousand words...then why haven't the stones recorded a decent album in three decades?

Please ask them if they're all "Nikon" people or if (like Jim Marshall) they work(ed) with the not-so-easy-to-use Leica...

The Stones must be some of the most photographed people in the world - how do you stop both them and you from falling back into shots that are old cliches - and what are the cliches?

Please, can you ask " Which photography could not do and why? "
thanks

I think this may be what Stone601 is asking, but did the Stones ever veto any of the photographs taken and, if so, why?

guy webster is here --shot the high tides green grass stuff - fascinating guy - back later