Tell Me :
Talk
Every situation is different. Some make it, some don't. Ever heard of Payton and Eli Manning?
Name me some of their songs and I'll tell you.
I think Archie Manning qualifies as being a famous and talented person.
You're always making these comparisons to sports and music, but athletic talent and musical talent are really nothing alike. Most people, with greater or lesser degrees of skill, can throw a ball. A baby can pick up a ball and throw it, but most people cannot write a song or play an instrument to save their lives.
Thousands write songs and play instruments. Just about every guitar player on this forum plays better than Keith Richards! Just ask them!
And literally millions of people play sports. The playground is full of guys who can sink a jump shot. Only a very few of them can rap (let alone sing) worth a damn.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-06-17 15:04 by tatters.
Yeah, and most humans have two legs and can walk, skip, jump, and chew gum and blow bubbles.
tatters, nothing you or I say or do is going to stop the sons of the Beatles from coming together. They are all talented and one day they will pool their talents and carry on in the tradition of their fathers. It is just a matter of time. I am looking forward to it. Just hope I live long enough to see it. As I have said, sometimes it works for famous offspring, sometimes it doesn't. In their case it is going to work to the tune of millions and millions of dollars. The promoters look at this a lot different then you and others do. Time will prove me right as it most often does. No Brag, Just Fact.
If lifelong, hardcore, and very knowledgeable Beatles fans like myself and many others on here don't give a rat's ass about any sons of Beatles tour, how much do you suppose the average person cares?
It's so bizarre, isn't it? Of all the things an old man could spend his golden years obsessing over. It's a little disturbing, quite frankly.
Wasn't me that brought the subject up.
It's the casual fans that fill the stadiums and arenas.
tatters, was it not you who "opened the door" to this topic? I don't need to convince anyone of what I already know.
James has said he doesn't think Zak would be interested but hinted maybe the younger Ringo son might be willing to join him, Dhani, and Sean at some point.
No daughters allowed! Don't care how talented they might be, ineedadrink, mitch, etc., etc..
Dear Gumboot, Ineedadrink, mitch, and all the many others: Playing a guitar and writing some rock 'n' roll songs isn't rocket science. I mean, just about every guitar player on IORR can play better than Keith Richards, right?
I can suspect you are a number of people on this forum for the same reasons you assume I am stonescrow and thewatchman. Many voices sound alike on this forum. You and many others sound like the same voice to me. Being suspicious and being paranoid are two different things.
James, Sean, Dhani, and Ringo's youngest son are not just any old Tom, Dick, and Harry. They are the sons of the Beatles. And are all talented musicians. They even look like their fathers. It's a promoters dream.
I think you're just embarrassed because you started a giant goodbye thread and now you're back and you don't want to admit that you can't stay away from this place. A little advice, if you're going to come back with a new name, try not to act and post the exact same nonsense (how many people on here over the years have compared sons of beatles to football players???) and then deny that you're that person. We're not stupid. At least I have the balls to admit that I've used various names, this one, ineedadrink, bernardshakey, izzy anderson.
But please, carry on with your stonescrowesque ramblings. They sure are entertaining!
Balls? Are they as big as Mick's?
Actually, I think we (you and I) are making progress here. You are much more civil these days. For that I guess I should be grateful. Also pleased to know that you find me entertaining.
One Love Gold Rings On Ya.
Yeah, he is a little shy, but I think he will overcome that in time.
I think they have great potential and would love to see them tap into that potential as a unit. If they were just half as good as their fathers they would slay the world.
I love the concept, but there is still a lot of work ahead to get the sons of the Beatles together. I would love to see them do something in 2014 for the 50th anniversary of the Beatles coming to America, but that may be rushing things a bit. I see something happening within the next five years but maybe not as early as 2014, although the sooner the better.
As this exchange clearly shows, it was you who brought the sons of the Beatles into the discussion. I never said a word about them.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2012-06-19 04:36 by tatters.
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: June 17, 2012 08:11
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
[www.express.co.uk]
This is beyond ridiculous. It was okay to release it in 1970, but it's not okay to re-release it now? That would be like pulling all copies of Gimme Shelter out of circulation now because after 42 years they've decided that it's too unpleasant.
The Beatles preached love but in the end had little for one another. They started their careers spending too much time together then split for solo careers. The sons are doing it just the opposite. They are getting the solo stuff out of their systems first before coming together.
I'm probably over estimating the intelligence of the average Beatles fan, but I can't for the life of me understand why anyone would care what the sons of Beatles decide to do with their lives.
Any promoter (worth a grain of salt) should care.
Any promoter that gets mixed up in a sons of Beatles tour is going to lose his shirt. Being a relative of a famous and talented person is not enough. Just ask Jermaine, Marlon, Jackie, and Tito. Who? Exactly.
Every situation is different. Some make it, some don't. Ever heard of Payton and Eli Manning?
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
tatters
()
Date: June 17, 2012 08:13
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
[www.express.co.uk]
This is beyond ridiculous. It was okay to release it in 1970, but it's not okay to re-release it now? That would be like pulling all copies of Gimme Shelter out of circulation now because after 42 years they've decided that it's too unpleasant.
The Beatles preached love but in the end had little for one another. They started their careers spending too much time together then split for solo careers. The sons are doing it just the opposite. They are getting the solo stuff out of their systems first before coming together.
I'm probably over estimating the intelligence of the average Beatles fan, but I can't for the life of me understand why anyone would care what the sons of Beatles decide to do with their lives.
Any promoter (worth a grain of salt) should care.
Any promoter that gets mixed up in a sons of Beatles tour is going to lose his shirt. Being a relative of a famous and talented person is not enough. Just ask Jermaine, Marlon, Jackie, and Tito. Who? Exactly.
Every situation is different. Some make it, some don't. Ever heard of Payton and Eli Manning?
Name me some of their songs and I'll tell you.
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: June 17, 2012 08:31
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
[www.express.co.uk]
This is beyond ridiculous. It was okay to release it in 1970, but it's not okay to re-release it now? That would be like pulling all copies of Gimme Shelter out of circulation now because after 42 years they've decided that it's too unpleasant.
The Beatles preached love but in the end had little for one another. They started their careers spending too much time together then split for solo careers. The sons are doing it just the opposite. They are getting the solo stuff out of their systems first before coming together.
I'm probably over estimating the intelligence of the average Beatles fan, but I can't for the life of me understand why anyone would care what the sons of Beatles decide to do with their lives.
Any promoter (worth a grain of salt) should care.
Any promoter that gets mixed up in a sons of Beatles tour is going to lose his shirt. Being a relative of a famous and talented person is not enough. Just ask Jermaine, Marlon, Jackie, and Tito. Who? Exactly.
Every situation is different. Some make it, some don't. Ever heard of Payton and Eli Manning?
Name me some of their songs and I'll tell you.
I think Archie Manning qualifies as being a famous and talented person.
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
tatters
()
Date: June 17, 2012 08:43
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
[www.express.co.uk]
This is beyond ridiculous. It was okay to release it in 1970, but it's not okay to re-release it now? That would be like pulling all copies of Gimme Shelter out of circulation now because after 42 years they've decided that it's too unpleasant.
The Beatles preached love but in the end had little for one another. They started their careers spending too much time together then split for solo careers. The sons are doing it just the opposite. They are getting the solo stuff out of their systems first before coming together.
I'm probably over estimating the intelligence of the average Beatles fan, but I can't for the life of me understand why anyone would care what the sons of Beatles decide to do with their lives.
Any promoter (worth a grain of salt) should care.
Any promoter that gets mixed up in a sons of Beatles tour is going to lose his shirt. Being a relative of a famous and talented person is not enough. Just ask Jermaine, Marlon, Jackie, and Tito. Who? Exactly.
Every situation is different. Some make it, some don't. Ever heard of Payton and Eli Manning?
Name me some of their songs and I'll tell you.
I think Archie Manning qualifies as being a famous and talented person.
You're always making these comparisons to sports and music, but athletic talent and musical talent are really nothing alike. Most people, with greater or lesser degrees of skill, can throw a ball. A baby can pick up a ball and throw it, but most people cannot write a song or play an instrument to save their lives.
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: June 17, 2012 08:57
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
[www.express.co.uk]
This is beyond ridiculous. It was okay to release it in 1970, but it's not okay to re-release it now? That would be like pulling all copies of Gimme Shelter out of circulation now because after 42 years they've decided that it's too unpleasant.
The Beatles preached love but in the end had little for one another. They started their careers spending too much time together then split for solo careers. The sons are doing it just the opposite. They are getting the solo stuff out of their systems first before coming together.
I'm probably over estimating the intelligence of the average Beatles fan, but I can't for the life of me understand why anyone would care what the sons of Beatles decide to do with their lives.
Any promoter (worth a grain of salt) should care.
Any promoter that gets mixed up in a sons of Beatles tour is going to lose his shirt. Being a relative of a famous and talented person is not enough. Just ask Jermaine, Marlon, Jackie, and Tito. Who? Exactly.
Every situation is different. Some make it, some don't. Ever heard of Payton and Eli Manning?
Name me some of their songs and I'll tell you.
I think Archie Manning qualifies as being a famous and talented person.
You're always making these comparisons to sports and music, but athletic talent and musical talent are really nothing alike. Most people, with greater or lesser degrees of skill, can throw a ball. A baby can pick up a ball and throw it, but most people cannot write a song or play an instrument to save their lives.
Thousands write songs and play instruments. Just about every guitar player on this forum plays better than Keith Richards! Just ask them!
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
tatters
()
Date: June 17, 2012 09:01
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
[www.express.co.uk]
This is beyond ridiculous. It was okay to release it in 1970, but it's not okay to re-release it now? That would be like pulling all copies of Gimme Shelter out of circulation now because after 42 years they've decided that it's too unpleasant.
The Beatles preached love but in the end had little for one another. They started their careers spending too much time together then split for solo careers. The sons are doing it just the opposite. They are getting the solo stuff out of their systems first before coming together.
I'm probably over estimating the intelligence of the average Beatles fan, but I can't for the life of me understand why anyone would care what the sons of Beatles decide to do with their lives.
Any promoter (worth a grain of salt) should care.
Any promoter that gets mixed up in a sons of Beatles tour is going to lose his shirt. Being a relative of a famous and talented person is not enough. Just ask Jermaine, Marlon, Jackie, and Tito. Who? Exactly.
Every situation is different. Some make it, some don't. Ever heard of Payton and Eli Manning?
Name me some of their songs and I'll tell you.
I think Archie Manning qualifies as being a famous and talented person.
You're always making these comparisons to sports and music, but athletic talent and musical talent are really nothing alike. Most people, with greater or lesser degrees of skill, can throw a ball. A baby can pick up a ball and throw it, but most people cannot write a song or play an instrument to save their lives.
Thousands write songs and play instruments. Just about every guitar player on this forum plays better than Keith Richards!
And literally millions of people play sports. The playground is full of guys who can sink a jump shot. Only a very few of them can rap (let alone sing) worth a damn.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-06-17 15:04 by tatters.
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: June 17, 2012 20:55
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
[www.express.co.uk]
This is beyond ridiculous. It was okay to release it in 1970, but it's not okay to re-release it now? That would be like pulling all copies of Gimme Shelter out of circulation now because after 42 years they've decided that it's too unpleasant.
The Beatles preached love but in the end had little for one another. They started their careers spending too much time together then split for solo careers. The sons are doing it just the opposite. They are getting the solo stuff out of their systems first before coming together.
I'm probably over estimating the intelligence of the average Beatles fan, but I can't for the life of me understand why anyone would care what the sons of Beatles decide to do with their lives.
Any promoter (worth a grain of salt) should care.
Any promoter that gets mixed up in a sons of Beatles tour is going to lose his shirt. Being a relative of a famous and talented person is not enough. Just ask Jermaine, Marlon, Jackie, and Tito. Who? Exactly.
Every situation is different. Some make it, some don't. Ever heard of Payton and Eli Manning?
Name me some of their songs and I'll tell you.
I think Archie Manning qualifies as being a famous and talented person.
You're always making these comparisons to sports and music, but athletic talent and musical talent are really nothing alike. Most people, with greater or lesser degrees of skill, can throw a ball. A baby can pick up a ball and throw it, but most people cannot write a song or play an instrument to save their lives.
Thousands write songs and play instruments. Just about every guitar player on this forum plays better than Keith Richards!
And literally millions of people play sports. The playground is full of guys who can sink a jump shot. Only a very few of them can rap (let alone sing) worth a damn.
Yeah, and most humans have two legs and can walk, skip, jump, and chew gum and blow bubbles.
tatters, nothing you or I say or do is going to stop the sons of the Beatles from coming together. They are all talented and one day they will pool their talents and carry on in the tradition of their fathers. It is just a matter of time. I am looking forward to it. Just hope I live long enough to see it. As I have said, sometimes it works for famous offspring, sometimes it doesn't. In their case it is going to work to the tune of millions and millions of dollars. The promoters look at this a lot different then you and others do. Time will prove me right as it most often does. No Brag, Just Fact.
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
71Tele
()
Date: June 17, 2012 21:14
OK, the cat is finally our of the bag with MightyStonesStillRollin50. We are back to the Sons of Beatles. I knew if we just waited patiently he would get there.
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
tatters
()
Date: June 17, 2012 21:15
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
[www.express.co.uk]
This is beyond ridiculous. It was okay to release it in 1970, but it's not okay to re-release it now? That would be like pulling all copies of Gimme Shelter out of circulation now because after 42 years they've decided that it's too unpleasant.
The Beatles preached love but in the end had little for one another. They started their careers spending too much time together then split for solo careers. The sons are doing it just the opposite. They are getting the solo stuff out of their systems first before coming together.
I'm probably over estimating the intelligence of the average Beatles fan, but I can't for the life of me understand why anyone would care what the sons of Beatles decide to do with their lives.
Any promoter (worth a grain of salt) should care.
Any promoter that gets mixed up in a sons of Beatles tour is going to lose his shirt. Being a relative of a famous and talented person is not enough. Just ask Jermaine, Marlon, Jackie, and Tito. Who? Exactly.
Every situation is different. Some make it, some don't. Ever heard of Payton and Eli Manning?
Name me some of their songs and I'll tell you.
I think Archie Manning qualifies as being a famous and talented person.
You're always making these comparisons to sports and music, but athletic talent and musical talent are really nothing alike. Most people, with greater or lesser degrees of skill, can throw a ball. A baby can pick up a ball and throw it, but most people cannot write a song or play an instrument to save their lives.
Thousands write songs and play instruments. Just about every guitar player on this forum plays better than Keith Richards!
And literally millions of people play sports. The playground is full of guys who can sink a jump shot. Only a very few of them can rap (let alone sing) worth a damn.
Yeah, and most humans have two legs and can walk, skip, jump, and chew gum and blow bubbles.
tatters, nothing you or I say or do is going to stop the sons of the Beatles from coming together. They are all talented and one day they will pool their talents and carry on in the tradition of their fathers. It is just a matter of time. I am looking forward to it. Just hope I live long enough to see it. As I have said, sometimes it works for famous offspring, sometimes it doesn't. In their case it is going to work to the tune of millions and millions of dollars. The promoters look at this a lot different then you and others do. Time will prove me right as it most often does. No Brag, Just Fact.
If lifelong, hardcore, and very knowledgeable Beatles fans like myself and many others on here don't give a rat's ass about any sons of Beatles tour, how much do you suppose the average person cares?
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
tatters
()
Date: June 17, 2012 21:20
Quote
71Tele
OK, the cat is finally our of the bag with MightyStonesStillRollin50. We are back to the Sons of Beatles. I knew if we just waited patiently he would get there.
It's so bizarre, isn't it? Of all the things an old man could spend his golden years obsessing over. It's a little disturbing, quite frankly.
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
jamesfdouglas
()
Date: June 17, 2012 21:33
A Sons of the Beatles project...
So, are all of the sons allowed to be in this? Or one son per Beatle? Who gets to play John? Sean or Julian? Would the son take on the musical role of their dad? ie, Don't DARE touch that bass, Dhani.
Ridiculous.
____________________________________________________________________
Brand new track 06/12/13
TIGER PUNCH
[www.reverbnation.com]
So, are all of the sons allowed to be in this? Or one son per Beatle? Who gets to play John? Sean or Julian? Would the son take on the musical role of their dad? ie, Don't DARE touch that bass, Dhani.
Ridiculous.
____________________________________________________________________
Brand new track 06/12/13
TIGER PUNCH
[www.reverbnation.com]
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: June 18, 2012 19:43
Quote
71Tele
OK, the cat is finally our of the bag with MightyStonesStillRollin50. We are back to the Sons of Beatles. I knew if we just waited patiently he would get there.
Wasn't me that brought the subject up.
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
GumbootCloggeroo
()
Date: June 18, 2012 20:02
Why does it have to be "sons of the beatles"? Why can't their daughters be included? After all, they came from the same ball sack so therefore they automatically have the same musical talent as their fathers, right? Right, stonescrow?
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: June 18, 2012 20:18
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
[www.express.co.uk]
This is beyond ridiculous. It was okay to release it in 1970, but it's not okay to re-release it now? That would be like pulling all copies of Gimme Shelter out of circulation now because after 42 years they've decided that it's too unpleasant.
The Beatles preached love but in the end had little for one another. They started their careers spending too much time together then split for solo careers. The sons are doing it just the opposite. They are getting the solo stuff out of their systems first before coming together.
I'm probably over estimating the intelligence of the average Beatles fan, but I can't for the life of me understand why anyone would care what the sons of Beatles decide to do with their lives.
Any promoter (worth a grain of salt) should care.
Any promoter that gets mixed up in a sons of Beatles tour is going to lose his shirt. Being a relative of a famous and talented person is not enough. Just ask Jermaine, Marlon, Jackie, and Tito. Who? Exactly.
Every situation is different. Some make it, some don't. Ever heard of Payton and Eli Manning?
Name me some of their songs and I'll tell you.
I think Archie Manning qualifies as being a famous and talented person.
You're always making these comparisons to sports and music, but athletic talent and musical talent are really nothing alike. Most people, with greater or lesser degrees of skill, can throw a ball. A baby can pick up a ball and throw it, but most people cannot write a song or play an instrument to save their lives.
Thousands write songs and play instruments. Just about every guitar player on this forum plays better than Keith Richards!
And literally millions of people play sports. The playground is full of guys who can sink a jump shot. Only a very few of them can rap (let alone sing) worth a damn.
Yeah, and most humans have two legs and can walk, skip, jump, and chew gum and blow bubbles.
tatters, nothing you or I say or do is going to stop the sons of the Beatles from coming together. They are all talented and one day they will pool their talents and carry on in the tradition of their fathers. It is just a matter of time. I am looking forward to it. Just hope I live long enough to see it. As I have said, sometimes it works for famous offspring, sometimes it doesn't. In their case it is going to work to the tune of millions and millions of dollars. The promoters look at this a lot different then you and others do. Time will prove me right as it most often does. No Brag, Just Fact.
If lifelong, hardcore, and very knowledgeable Beatles fans like myself and many others on here don't give a rat's ass about any sons of Beatles tour, how much do you suppose the average person cares?
It's the casual fans that fill the stadiums and arenas.
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: June 18, 2012 20:21
Quote
tatters
Quote
71Tele
OK, the cat is finally our of the bag with MightyStonesStillRollin50. We are back to the Sons of Beatles. I knew if we just waited patiently he would get there.
It's so bizarre, isn't it? Of all the things an old man could spend his golden years obsessing over. It's a little disturbing, quite frankly.
tatters, was it not you who "opened the door" to this topic? I don't need to convince anyone of what I already know.
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: June 18, 2012 20:28
Quote
jamesfdouglas
A Sons of the Beatles project...
So, are all of the sons allowed to be in this? Or one son per Beatle? Who gets to play John? Sean or Julian? Would the son take on the musical role of their dad? ie, Don't DARE touch that bass, Dhani.
Ridiculous.
James has said he doesn't think Zak would be interested but hinted maybe the younger Ringo son might be willing to join him, Dhani, and Sean at some point.
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
varilla
()
Date: June 18, 2012 20:36
I would rather prefer a band with the DAUGHTERS OF THE STONES. Hot!!!!
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
GumbootCloggeroo
()
Date: June 18, 2012 20:36
It's one thing if the sons of the Beatles got together and played some music. But what blows my mind is the fact that thewatchman/stonescrow/MightyStonesStillRollin50/whateveryou'llcallyourself2monthsfromnow thinks that if they did get together that it would be the greatest thing ever and they would produce some music on the same level as The Beatles based ONLY on the fact that they are their offspring and that Beatlemania would be revived and they'll be on top of the world just like their fathers. AND, as evidence that this scheme can work, he uses father/son football players as evidence? Wow.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-06-18 20:37 by GumbootCloggeroo.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-06-18 20:37 by GumbootCloggeroo.
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: June 18, 2012 20:49
Quote
GumbootCloggeroo
Why does it have to be "sons of the beatles"? Why can't their daughters be included? After all, they came from the same ball sack so therefore they automatically have the same musical talent as their fathers, right? Right, stonescrow?
No daughters allowed! Don't care how talented they might be, ineedadrink, mitch, etc., etc..
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
GumbootCloggeroo
()
Date: June 18, 2012 20:59
I'm flattered that you remembered my old name, ineedadrink, but why can't Beatles daughters be included?
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: June 18, 2012 21:05
Quote
GumbootCloggeroo
It's one thing if the sons of the Beatles got together and played some music. But what blows my mind is the fact that thewatchman/stonescrow/MightyStonesStillRollin50/whateveryou'llcallyourself2monthsfromnow thinks that if they did get together that it would be the greatest thing ever and they would produce some music on the same level as The Beatles based ONLY on the fact that they are their offspring and that Beatlemania would be revived and they'll be on top of the world just like their fathers. AND, as evidence that this scheme can work, he uses father/son football players as evidence? Wow.
Dear Gumboot, Ineedadrink, mitch, and all the many others: Playing a guitar and writing some rock 'n' roll songs isn't rocket science. I mean, just about every guitar player on IORR can play better than Keith Richards, right?
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
GumbootCloggeroo
()
Date: June 18, 2012 21:18
myself and mitchflorida are two different people. How you even began to assume I am mitchflorida is beyond me. Paranoid much?
Just because someone can play guitar and write a rock and roll song doesn't mean they can recreate Beatlemania.
Just because someone can play guitar and write a rock and roll song doesn't mean they can recreate Beatlemania.
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: June 18, 2012 21:41
Quote
GumbootCloggeroo
myself and mitchflorida are two different people. How you even began to assume I am mitchflorida is beyond me. Paranoid much?
Just because someone can play guitar and write a rock and roll song doesn't mean they can recreate Beatlemania.
I can suspect you are a number of people on this forum for the same reasons you assume I am stonescrow and thewatchman. Many voices sound alike on this forum. You and many others sound like the same voice to me. Being suspicious and being paranoid are two different things.
James, Sean, Dhani, and Ringo's youngest son are not just any old Tom, Dick, and Harry. They are the sons of the Beatles. And are all talented musicians. They even look like their fathers. It's a promoters dream.
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
GumbootCloggeroo
()
Date: June 18, 2012 21:51
You suspect that I'm mitchflorida? Right, because I'm spewing right wing bullshit all the time. I just puked in my mouth a little bit, actually.Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
I can suspect you are a number of people on this forum for the same reasons you assume I am stonescrow and thewatchman. Many voices sound alike on this forum. You and many others sound like the same voice to me. Being suspicious and being paranoid are two different things.
I think you're just embarrassed because you started a giant goodbye thread and now you're back and you don't want to admit that you can't stay away from this place. A little advice, if you're going to come back with a new name, try not to act and post the exact same nonsense (how many people on here over the years have compared sons of beatles to football players???) and then deny that you're that person. We're not stupid. At least I have the balls to admit that I've used various names, this one, ineedadrink, bernardshakey, izzy anderson.
But please, carry on with your stonescrowesque ramblings. They sure are entertaining!
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
sanQ
()
Date: June 19, 2012 01:29
James McCartney? I think he has some talent, but he's got something wrong with him. H is incapable of smiling. There is something major that bothers him. I wish I could put my finger on it. He was on Letterman and he seemed to not care less. No emotion at all. It's like he's incapable of showing emotion. I don't think growing up the son of Paul McCartney was all that great. I can't see this band doing that great unless they were able to write incredible songs. But that's not going to happen. They are decent, but not near the masterpieces of John, Paul, or George. Unless they have something great hidden away. Who knows...I want to see a picture of them all together as a group. That would be neat to see. I would rather see that than hear the music. Face it, there will never be another Beatles. You might as well take four plumbers and have them post together for a picture, that would be just as cool. lol
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: June 19, 2012 02:54
Quote
GumbootCloggeroo
You suspect that I'm mitchflorida? Right, because I'm spewing right wing bullshit all the time. I just puked in my mouth a little bit, actually.Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
I can suspect you are a number of people on this forum for the same reasons you assume I am stonescrow and thewatchman. Many voices sound alike on this forum. You and many others sound like the same voice to me. Being suspicious and being paranoid are two different things.
I think you're just embarrassed because you started a giant goodbye thread and now you're back and you don't want to admit that you can't stay away from this place. A little advice, if you're going to come back with a new name, try not to act and post the exact same nonsense (how many people on here over the years have compared sons of beatles to football players???) and then deny that you're that person. We're not stupid. At least I have the balls to admit that I've used various names, this one, ineedadrink, bernardshakey, izzy anderson.
But please, carry on with your stonescrowesque ramblings. They sure are entertaining!
Balls? Are they as big as Mick's?
Actually, I think we (you and I) are making progress here. You are much more civil these days. For that I guess I should be grateful. Also pleased to know that you find me entertaining.One Love Gold Rings On Ya.
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: June 19, 2012 03:00
Quote
sanQ
James McCartney? I think he has some talent, but he's got something wrong with him. H is incapable of smiling. There is something major that bothers him. I wish I could put my finger on it. He was on Letterman and he seemed to not care less. No emotion at all. It's like he's incapable of showing emotion. I don't think growing up the son of Paul McCartney was all that great. I can't see this band doing that great unless they were able to write incredible songs. But that's not going to happen. They are decent, but not near the masterpieces of John, Paul, or George. Unless they have something great hidden away. Who knows...I want to see a picture of them all together as a group. That would be neat to see. I would rather see that than hear the music. Face it, there will never be another Beatles. You might as well take four plumbers and have them post together for a picture, that would be just as cool. lol
Yeah, he is a little shy, but I think he will overcome that in time.
I think they have great potential and would love to see them tap into that potential as a unit. If they were just half as good as their fathers they would slay the world.
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
71Tele
()
Date: June 19, 2012 03:25
Did the Herman's Hermits have any sons? I mean, why stop with The Beatles? It could be a whole "sons of the British Invasion". Talk about "slaying the world", this would do it. The world needs another big wave of magic from the U.K. - just like 1964! So bring on the Sons of Peter & Gordon, the Sons of Gerry & The Pacemakers, and the Sons of The Dave Clark Five. I'm ready!
Does Ed Sullivan have a son? What about Murray The K?
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2012-06-19 03:30 by 71Tele.
Does Ed Sullivan have a son? What about Murray The K?
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2012-06-19 03:30 by 71Tele.
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: June 19, 2012 03:51
Quote
71Tele
Did the Herman's Hermits have any sons? I mean, why stop with The Beatles? It could be a whole "sons of the British Invasion". Talk about "slaying the world", this would do it. The world needs another big wave of magic from the U.K. - just like 1964! So bring on the Sons of Peter & Gordon, the Sons of Gerry & The Pacemakers, and the Sons of The Dave Clark Five. I'm ready!
Does Ed Sullivan have a son? What about Murray The K?
I love the concept, but there is still a lot of work ahead to get the sons of the Beatles together. I would love to see them do something in 2014 for the 50th anniversary of the Beatles coming to America, but that may be rushing things a bit. I see something happening within the next five years but maybe not as early as 2014, although the sooner the better.
Re: OT: What Do You Suppose THIS Is About?
Posted by:
tatters
()
Date: June 19, 2012 04:34
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
tatters
[www.express.co.uk]
This is beyond ridiculous. It was okay to release it in 1970, but it's not okay to re-release it now? That would be like pulling all copies of Gimme Shelter out of circulation now because after 42 years they've decided that it's too unpleasant.
The Beatles preached love but in the end had little for one another. They started their careers spending too much time together then split for solo careers. The sons are doing it just the opposite. They are getting the solo stuff out of their systems first before coming together.
As this exchange clearly shows, it was you who brought the sons of the Beatles into the discussion. I never said a word about them.
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 2012-06-19 04:36 by tatters.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
artinis1 , beachbreak , bigbitch , Blueranger , Bobby4 , Britney , canadian.sway , Dan , detroitken , drjay , duke richardson , elflaco , From4tilLate , Godxofxrock9 , gtx8834 , jazzbass , kowalski , machan37 , mstmst , Nasty Habits , Rokyfan , ROPENI , SirMuddy , Stoneage , terukun , TimeIs , ts
Guests:
171
Record Number of Users:
56
on June 20, 2013 00:52
Record Number of Guests:
250
on June 20, 2013 00:29
