Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

She was hOT
Posted by: Honestman ()
Date: May 25, 2012 02:36

This one 's not another hOT thread grinning smiley





HMN
StonesCave

Re: She was hOT
Posted by: midnrambler ()
Date: May 25, 2012 13:07

Dieses Video enthält Content von EMI. Dieser Partner hat das Video in deinem Land aus urheberrechtlichen Gründen gesperrt.
ProxTube konnte das Video nicht entsperren. Möglicherweise ist es auch in den USA gesperrt.

Re: She was hOT
Posted by: marcovandereijk ()
Date: May 25, 2012 13:50

Brilliantly stupid video, like so many of them in those years.

I want to get lost in your rock 'n roll and drift away

Re: She was hOT
Posted by: LieB ()
Date: May 25, 2012 16:54

Probably my favourite song on Undercover, and yeah the video is definitely brilliantly stupid, very entertaining, very early MTV. A lot more fun than the boring She's So Cold video.

Re: She was hOT
Posted by: Green Lady ()
Date: May 25, 2012 17:56

"We cannot burn Mick Jagger"...

Well obviously Martin Scorsese didn't direct this!

Re: She was hOT
Posted by: Doxa ()
Date: May 26, 2012 00:05

Surely the best of the UNDERCOVER videos. It has aged best, and it still funny to watch whereas those poorman's thrillers, "Undercover of The Night" and "Too Much Blood" are simply boring, corny and damn dated.

- Doxa

Re: She was hOT
Posted by: uhbuhgullayew ()
Date: May 26, 2012 07:40

Quote
Doxa
Surely the best of the UNDERCOVER videos. It has aged best, and it still funny to watch whereas those poorman's thrillers, "Undercover of The Night" and "Too Much Blood" are simply boring, corny and damn dated.

- Doxa

Undercover of the Night is my favorite vid of all-time.

Re: She was hOT
Posted by: Rockman ()
Date: May 26, 2012 09:13

Yeah Temple's Undercover is ACE....esp the Mekico vid ...

ROCKMAN

Re: She was hOT
Posted by: Doxa ()
Date: May 26, 2012 10:51

In regards to "Undercover of The Night" video, as like with the song iself, I think there is so much effort put not really a flow. They try so hard to make a big video, a'la "Thriller", that is, a very big current contribution, but don't really have an artistic drive for that. There is something artificial in the whole affair. It doesn't roll naturally aesthetically, me thinks. It has very much same problem as many Mick Jagger solo offerings in the following years.

As for the song's, and video's 'political' content, it is very much pointed out, especially visually, but to me it hits closer to the relevance of "Indian Girl" than "Street Fighting Man". Married with 80's video aestheticism, I just find it now simply corny, in trying to discuss some serious themes with that method (besides, the way to tell the story with certain theatretical but obvious shots, is rather dull, and can't stand repeaeted runs, especially now). I think just there is is something, to use anachronistic expression, Bono-like in the whole concept, if you know what I mean...

But I think the song and the video - you can't really seperate them - is the very last time The Stones tried 100% to be current and reinvent themselves according to the trends, and really pushed hard. Or to say it properly, the very last time Jagger used the vehicle of The Stones to do that. It is a historical piece of matter in that sense! (Seemingly, if we look his following actions, Jagger wasn't too happy with results.)

- Doxa

Re: She was hOT
Posted by: Doxa ()
Date: May 26, 2012 11:14

Quote
Doxa
(Seemingly, if we look his following actions, Jagger wasn't too happy with results.)

I mean, even though the video got quite a lot of hype and attention at the time, I am not sure if Jagger was happy with it artistically or commercially (UNDERCOVER album was commercially a disappointment in compared to their past rich years - SOME GIRLS and TATTOO YOU were huge sellers, and even EMOTIONAL RESCUE did very fine - and this was the time of some incredible rise in album sales, THRILLER being, of course, a crown jewel). I think Jagger was reading the changes in the air (or in stock market) and making career-wise big decisions.

It could be that even though he might have liked the results in artisticwise, he wasn't happy how to achieve them. The band coudn't transform itself well or easy enough to survive the new decade and its demands. Read: he didn't want cope with stubborn Keith any longer. Probably he thought he could survive better alone - both artistically and commercially, since being able to adapt the latest trends would be translated in commercial success. I suppose the latter implication was the language Mick Jagger - a superstar of two decades, with no flops - understood at the time - until he got a tough lesson of mortality...

- Doxa



Edited 3 time(s). Last edit at 2012-05-26 11:29 by Doxa.

Re: She was hOT
Posted by: uhbuhgullayew ()
Date: May 26, 2012 17:44

Thanks for your posts Doxa!

Very insightful and the term "Bono-like" cracked me up quite a bit. Spot on with that analogy.


Quote
Doxa
I think just there is is something, to use anachronistic expression, Bono-like in the whole concept, if you know what I mean...


- Doxa

Re: She was hOT
Posted by: phd ()
Date: May 26, 2012 18:41

The only song that surely solve Undercover from being a poor CD. Hopefully magnificently revived by Scorsese in Shine a Light.

Re: She was hOT
Posted by: tops06 ()
Date: May 27, 2012 02:18

Back in 1983, the local radio station had played the long version of She Was Hot before it was suppose to be released (WMMR - Philly).

Still kind of bummed they never released that version on the album.

Always loved the JAM at the end....



Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 183
Record Number of Users: 56 on May 17, 2013 21:31
Record Number of Guests: 253 on May 18, 2013 00:29

Previous page Next page First page IORR home