For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Quote
mitchflorida1
Quote
DandelionPowderman
How is this terrible?? Great guitar playing, a swinging piano and a band that cooks! What more can one ask for?
Maybe you never heard the Stones original version.
You're kidding, right?
Both are great. The first one with its naive, innocent drive and the 81-version for its raggedness, extremely well-played guitars and pianos and swing. Only weak link on the latter is Mick, who is out of breath...
Quote
mitchflorida1
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Quote
mitchflorida1
Quote
DandelionPowderman
How is this terrible?? Great guitar playing, a swinging piano and a band that cooks! What more can one ask for?
Maybe you never heard the Stones original version.
You're kidding, right?
Both are great. The first one with its naive, innocent drive and the 81-version for its raggedness, extremely well-played guitars and pianos and swing. Only weak link on the latter is Mick, who is out of breath...
Yes, it was so good that the latter day Stones never dared to play it again in concert.
Quote
Stoneage
I believe "coked up" is the right word for it. Being unrehearsed, sloppy and coked up was considered cool in the 70s. I don't know if it was considered cool in 1981 though. Maybe it was that that Jagger eventually grasped, hence the Vegas era to come...
Quote
mitchflorida1
Quote
DandelionPowderman
How is this terrible?? Great guitar playing, a swinging piano and a band that cooks! What more can one ask for?
Maybe you never heard the Stones original version.
Quote
Carnaby
Quote
mitchflorida1
Quote
DandelionPowderman
How is this terrible?? Great guitar playing, a swinging piano and a band that cooks! What more can one ask for?
Maybe you never heard the Stones original version.
The original is the work of the Masters. But what can you do, Brian is gone. With Brian, truly the Rolling Stones.
Quote
mitchflorida1
By the way, that Shindig clip is the first and only time I have seen the Stones play live with beautiful dancing girls in back. Love those dancing girls!
maybe but did you see his dancing ?Quote
DandelionPowderman
Quote
mitchflorida1
Quote
DandelionPowderman
How is this terrible?? Great guitar playing, a swinging piano and a band that cooks! What more can one ask for?
Maybe you never heard the Stones original version.
You're kidding, right?
Both are great. The first one with its naive, innocent drive and the 81-version for its raggedness, extremely well-played guitars and pianos and swing. Only weak link on the latter is Mick, who is out of breath...
Quote
Mathijs
Quote
tomk
I like it. Is this from Philadelphia? However, I don't like the sound of those amps, Boogie heads and EV cabinets (later Boogie cabinets). 1978 had the best "amp" sound.
It's not the sound of the amps and cabs what you're hearing here. It's the thin, spiky, treble mono video board recording that makes the sound.
Mathijs
Quote
mitchflorida1
By the way, that Shindig clip is the first and only time I have seen the Stones play live with beautiful dancing girls in back. Love those dancing girls!
Quote
Mathijs
Quote
mitchflorida1
By the way, that Shindig clip is the first and only time I have seen the Stones play live with beautiful dancing girls in back. Love those dancing girls!
Er- it's not live. It's live vocals over pre-recorded backing track.
Mathijs
Quote
mitchflorida1
Quote
Mathijs
Quote
mitchflorida1
By the way, that Shindig clip is the first and only time I have seen the Stones play live with beautiful dancing girls in back. Love those dancing girls!
Er- it's not live. It's live vocals over pre-recorded backing track.
Mathijs
No way. It is live! What do you think Charlie Watts is doing?
If you watch closely, you can see the saxes playing. Billy Preston on organ.
Quote
Mathijs
Quote
mitchflorida1
Quote
Mathijs
Quote
mitchflorida1
By the way, that Shindig clip is the first and only time I have seen the Stones play live with beautiful dancing girls in back. Love those dancing girls!
Er- it's not live. It's live vocals over pre-recorded backing track.
Mathijs
No way. It is live! What do you think Charlie Watts is doing?
If you watch closely, you can see the saxes playing. Billy Preston on organ.
? what the fvck are you on? There's no saxes, no Preston: and it's not live!
Stop taking those mushrooms!
Mathijs
Quote
mitchflorida1
Quote
Mathijs
Quote
mitchflorida1
Quote
Mathijs
Quote
mitchflorida1
By the way, that Shindig clip is the first and only time I have seen the Stones play live with beautiful dancing girls in back. Love those dancing girls!
Er- it's not live. It's live vocals over pre-recorded backing track.
Mathijs
No way. It is live! What do you think Charlie Watts is doing?
If you watch closely, you can see the saxes playing. Billy Preston on organ.
? what the fvck are you on? There's no saxes, no Preston: and it's not live!
Stop taking those mushrooms!
Mathijs
The saxes kick in at the 0:26 mark.
Billy Preston was on the guest list for that Shindig Show on May 26 1965.
Mathijs, you think you are such a know-it-all. Have some class and apologize.
I love proving that you are wrong! LOL! LOL!
[www.ovguide.com]#
thank god for that. it rocked in 1981, but if they tried to play it vegas-style, it would royally suck.Quote
mitchflorida1
Quote
DandelionPowderman
Quote
mitchflorida1
Quote
DandelionPowderman
How is this terrible?? Great guitar playing, a swinging piano and a band that cooks! What more can one ask for?
Maybe you never heard the Stones original version.
You're kidding, right?
Both are great. The first one with its naive, innocent drive and the 81-version for its raggedness, extremely well-played guitars and pianos and swing. Only weak link on the latter is Mick, who is out of breath...
Yes, it was so good that the latter day Stones never dared to play it again in concert.