Tell Me :
Talk
What a great ending for the show if Keith showed up and he and Mick walked off arm in arm. That is the dream I had last night.
Unless, in the near future, there is a release of the filmed rehearsals on a DVD package, likely the documentary that is upcoming...Tele's theory would just about have to be correct.
Even if the specifics are wrong its hard to believe the possibility of Keith playing on SNL with Mick wasn't discussed.
I think this is a reasonable assumption. All reports of the rehearsals referred to them practicing 3 or 4 songs - why would they do that if they were "just getting their chops together"? If it is true it's incredibly sad though.
sc uk
What do "we" know that leads you to believe that your theory shouldn't be considered absurd? When I say 'no chance" I base that on common sense. It is absurd to think that the Rolling Stones couldn't nail down two songs for an appearance on SNL if that was the goal when they got together. It defies logic. There are other possibilities that make more sense. #1. The rehearsal could be for the coming documentary. #2. Could be just another session toward getting their "chops" down for the coming tour. #3. Could be the first session toward cutting a new album. #3. Maybe they cut a new song to be introduced tonight on SNL or are actually going to perform tonight? Unlikely, but more logical (albeit, slightly) than what you have suggested.
Colonial, sometimes I find you're posts a bit absurd quite frankly.
Hopefully you didn't have to launder the sheets today.
Thank you thank you...please remember to tip your servers graciously.
No kidding. These 36 pages (so far) needed 2 post, one to announce Mick was going to do it, and two to note who he was playing with.
I am not Colonial. Whomever, that is?
It's tonight I am more worried about!
sure...with apologies. (fcbmb)
0.
He "looks like a 70 year old man"? He's...68, right? That's not 70. What does 70 look like? Jagger? Jagger looks like Jagger at 68. He'll look 70 for him when he's 70, which will probably be exactly what he looks like now, dyed hair to boot.
What does Keith look like? 90? Is that what 90 looks like?
i guess you are very beautiful, half and half
jeroen
Apparently saying he looks like a 70 year old man (which he is), has dyed hair (which he does), and has wrinkles (which he does) is an insult.
And to think some would like to ban the speculation threads.
I was about to wash my teeth this morning and noticed a red coloration on it. We both have seen signs. Stones on TV tonight. LOL
So if you're 18 you're basically 21 then with that thinking. Right. It's easy to get the number right. If he dies tomorrow he still isn't 70.
Okay...68. And even at 68, he still looks like an old man with dyed hair. None of the points change.
Yeah, he is what he is and what he looks how he looks and that matches your description.
Just an observation eh.
___________________________
The Brian Jones Experience
You are absolutely correct. He is what he is. And saying that is not insulting him, despite what some others seem to think. Some people are in denial.
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: May 19, 2012 21:37
Quote
corriecas
Keef wont be there
jeroen
What a great ending for the show if Keith showed up and he and Mick walked off arm in arm. That is the dream I had last night.
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
KeefintheNight82
()
Date: May 19, 2012 22:00
Quote
71Tele
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
71Tele
My theory is this: Jagger called the band together to rehearse with the possibility that the Stones would indeed appear on SNL. This is why they rehearsed hits like JJF and SMU. When it became apparent that the band (Keith) was not in condition to do the performance, he went to Plan B, which was Food Fight, Jeff Beck, etc. Keith must feel awful about this, but I do not believe it was a coincidence that the Stones' rehearsals were in NY right at the exact same time they would have needed to rehearse in order to do SNL. Why would Jagger bother adding Stones activity to an already-packed SNL schedule if this wasn't the plan? Taylor being there at the same time may just have been a coincidence. What a lost opportunity. But if Jagger performs Stones songs with these imposters, it pretty much proves my theory, or why do it?
No offense, but this theory of yours borders on the absurd. No chance this is how it went down.
Maybe it's not accurate - I did say "theory" - but given what we know I see no reason that it should be considered "absurd". If you know how it really "went down", please enlighten us, and I will be happy to revise my thinking.
Unless, in the near future, there is a release of the filmed rehearsals on a DVD package, likely the documentary that is upcoming...Tele's theory would just about have to be correct.
Even if the specifics are wrong its hard to believe the possibility of Keith playing on SNL with Mick wasn't discussed.
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
straycatuk
()
Date: May 19, 2012 22:01
Quote
71Tele
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
71Tele
My theory is this: Jagger called the band together to rehearse with the possibility that the Stones would indeed appear on SNL. This is why they rehearsed hits like JJF and SMU. When it became apparent that the band (Keith) was not in condition to do the performance, he went to Plan B, which was Food Fight, Jeff Beck, etc. Keith must feel awful about this, but I do not believe it was a coincidence that the Stones' rehearsals were in NY right at the exact same time they would have needed to rehearse in order to do SNL. Why would Jagger bother adding Stones activity to an already-packed SNL schedule if this wasn't the plan? Taylor being there at the same time may just have been a coincidence. What a lost opportunity. But if Jagger performs Stones songs with these imposters, it pretty much proves my theory, or why do it?
No offense, but this theory of yours borders on the absurd. No chance this is how it went down.
Maybe it's not accurate - I did say "theory" - but given what we know I see no reason that it should be considered "absurd". If you know how it really "went down", please enlighten us, and I will be happy to revise my thinking.
I think this is a reasonable assumption. All reports of the rehearsals referred to them practicing 3 or 4 songs - why would they do that if they were "just getting their chops together"? If it is true it's incredibly sad though.
sc uk
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
Nimrod
()
Date: May 19, 2012 22:02
Today this guy on the street stuck his tongue out at me. I think it's a sign. We all know the tongue is the iconic Stones logo. Stones on SNL tonight.
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: May 19, 2012 22:15
Quote
71Tele
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
71Tele
My theory is this: Jagger called the band together to rehearse with the possibility that the Stones would indeed appear on SNL. This is why they rehearsed hits like JJF and SMU. When it became apparent that the band (Keith) was not in condition to do the performance, he went to Plan B, which was Food Fight, Jeff Beck, etc. Keith must feel awful about this, but I do not believe it was a coincidence that the Stones' rehearsals were in NY right at the exact same time they would have needed to rehearse in order to do SNL. Why would Jagger bother adding Stones activity to an already-packed SNL schedule if this wasn't the plan? Taylor being there at the same time may just have been a coincidence. What a lost opportunity. But if Jagger performs Stones songs with these imposters, it pretty much proves my theory, or why do it?
No offense, but this theory of yours borders on the absurd. No chance this is how it went down.
Maybe it's not accurate - I did say "theory" - but given what we know I see no reason that it should be considered "absurd". If you know how it really "went down", please enlighten us, and I will be happy to revise my thinking.
What do "we" know that leads you to believe that your theory shouldn't be considered absurd? When I say 'no chance" I base that on common sense. It is absurd to think that the Rolling Stones couldn't nail down two songs for an appearance on SNL if that was the goal when they got together. It defies logic. There are other possibilities that make more sense. #1. The rehearsal could be for the coming documentary. #2. Could be just another session toward getting their "chops" down for the coming tour. #3. Could be the first session toward cutting a new album. #3. Maybe they cut a new song to be introduced tonight on SNL or are actually going to perform tonight? Unlikely, but more logical (albeit, slightly) than what you have suggested.
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: May 19, 2012 22:27
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
71Tele
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
71Tele
My theory is this: Jagger called the band together to rehearse with the possibility that the Stones would indeed appear on SNL. This is why they rehearsed hits like JJF and SMU. When it became apparent that the band (Keith) was not in condition to do the performance, he went to Plan B, which was Food Fight, Jeff Beck, etc. Keith must feel awful about this, but I do not believe it was a coincidence that the Stones' rehearsals were in NY right at the exact same time they would have needed to rehearse in order to do SNL. Why would Jagger bother adding Stones activity to an already-packed SNL schedule if this wasn't the plan? Taylor being there at the same time may just have been a coincidence. What a lost opportunity. But if Jagger performs Stones songs with these imposters, it pretty much proves my theory, or why do it?
No offense, but this theory of yours borders on the absurd. No chance this is how it went down.
Maybe it's not accurate - I did say "theory" - but given what we know I see no reason that it should be considered "absurd". If you know how it really "went down", please enlighten us, and I will be happy to revise my thinking.
What do "we" know that leads you to believe that your theory shouldn't be considered absurd? When I say 'no chance" I base that on common sense. It is absurd to think that the Rolling Stones couldn't nail down two songs for an appearance on SNL if that was the goal when they got together. It defies logic. There are other possibilities that make more sense. #1. The rehearsal could be for the coming documentary. #2. Could be just another session toward getting their "chops" down for the coming tour. #3. Could be the first session toward cutting a new album. #3. Maybe they cut a new song to be introduced tonight on SNL or are actually going to perform tonight? Unlikely, but more logical (albeit, slightly) than what you have suggested.
Colonial, sometimes I find you're posts a bit absurd quite frankly.
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: May 19, 2012 22:29
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
corriecas
Keef wont be there
jeroen
What a great ending for the show if Keith showed up and he and Mick walked off arm in arm. That is the dream I had last night.
Hopefully you didn't have to launder the sheets today.
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
sweetcharmedlife
()
Date: May 19, 2012 22:30
Quote
treaclefingers
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
corriecas
Keef wont be there
jeroen
What a great ending for the show if Keith showed up and he and Mick walked off arm in arm. That is the dream I had last night.
Hopefully you didn't have to launder the sheets today.
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
Sighunt
()
Date: May 19, 2012 22:32
Over 48,000 views and over 1000 posts (including mine right now) and the speculation and the postulating continues right up until show time! Wow, if many of you had been around during the Kennedy assasination, you would have had a field day collaborating with all the other conspiracy theorists who came out of the woodwork (LOL)! I don't know about you, but I'm going to be happy when this Jagger SNL appearance is over with...
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: May 19, 2012 22:34
Quote
sweetcharmedlife
Quote
treaclefingers
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
corriecas
Keef wont be there
jeroen
What a great ending for the show if Keith showed up and he and Mick walked off arm in arm. That is the dream I had last night.
Hopefully you didn't have to launder the sheets today.
Thank you thank you...please remember to tip your servers graciously.
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
24FPS
()
Date: May 19, 2012 22:43
Quote
Sighunt
Over 48,000 views and over 1000 posts (including mine right now) and the speculation and the postulating continues right up until show time! Wow, if many of you had been around during the Kennedy assasination, you would have had a field day collaborating with all the other conspiracy theorists who came out of the woodwork (LOL)! I don't know about you, but I'm going to be happy when this Jagger SNL appearance is over with...
No kidding. These 36 pages (so far) needed 2 post, one to announce Mick was going to do it, and two to note who he was playing with.Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
marquess
()
Date: May 19, 2012 23:50
Hi guys,
Do You know why outside north america it is not possible to see the promotional vídeos of SNL?
Is it because I have a Mac or @#$%&?
Do You know why outside north america it is not possible to see the promotional vídeos of SNL?
Is it because I have a Mac or @#$%&?
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: May 19, 2012 23:51
Quote
treaclefingers
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
71Tele
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
71Tele
My theory is this: Jagger called the band together to rehearse with the possibility that the Stones would indeed appear on SNL. This is why they rehearsed hits like JJF and SMU. When it became apparent that the band (Keith) was not in condition to do the performance, he went to Plan B, which was Food Fight, Jeff Beck, etc. Keith must feel awful about this, but I do not believe it was a coincidence that the Stones' rehearsals were in NY right at the exact same time they would have needed to rehearse in order to do SNL. Why would Jagger bother adding Stones activity to an already-packed SNL schedule if this wasn't the plan? Taylor being there at the same time may just have been a coincidence. What a lost opportunity. But if Jagger performs Stones songs with these imposters, it pretty much proves my theory, or why do it?
No offense, but this theory of yours borders on the absurd. No chance this is how it went down.
Maybe it's not accurate - I did say "theory" - but given what we know I see no reason that it should be considered "absurd". If you know how it really "went down", please enlighten us, and I will be happy to revise my thinking.
What do "we" know that leads you to believe that your theory shouldn't be considered absurd? When I say 'no chance" I base that on common sense. It is absurd to think that the Rolling Stones couldn't nail down two songs for an appearance on SNL if that was the goal when they got together. It defies logic. There are other possibilities that make more sense. #1. The rehearsal could be for the coming documentary. #2. Could be just another session toward getting their "chops" down for the coming tour. #3. Could be the first session toward cutting a new album. #3. Maybe they cut a new song to be introduced tonight on SNL or are actually going to perform tonight? Unlikely, but more logical (albeit, slightly) than what you have suggested.
Colonial, sometimes I find you're posts a bit absurd quite frankly.
I am not Colonial. Whomever, that is?
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: May 19, 2012 23:54
Quote
treaclefingers
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
corriecas
Keef wont be there
jeroen
What a great ending for the show if Keith showed up and he and Mick walked off arm in arm. That is the dream I had last night.
Hopefully you didn't have to launder the sheets today.
It's tonight I am more worried about!
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
chelskeith
()
Date: May 19, 2012 23:57
What's the over and under on how many Stones songs will be played tonight.
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
chelskeith
()
Date: May 20, 2012 00:06
Unfortunately, it looks like barring any incredible secret keeping and a minor miracle, none by the Stones.
Disappointing?
Definitely.
Sad?
No way. The Fiftieth Anniversary has so many possibilities and Mick will not let that slide by.
If they couldn't play, if someone was sick or hurt, that would be sad, but that's not the case here.
Maybe making people speculate will only increase the demand when everyone thinks they're done, which many will think after tonight when its just a Mickfest.
Time will tell.
Like I said in my last post :
IT'S ONLY ROCK AND ROLL
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-05-20 00:21 by chelskeith.
Disappointing?
Definitely.
Sad?
No way. The Fiftieth Anniversary has so many possibilities and Mick will not let that slide by.
If they couldn't play, if someone was sick or hurt, that would be sad, but that's not the case here.
Maybe making people speculate will only increase the demand when everyone thinks they're done, which many will think after tonight when its just a Mickfest.
Time will tell.
Like I said in my last post :
IT'S ONLY ROCK AND ROLL
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-05-20 00:21 by chelskeith.
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: May 20, 2012 00:17
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
treaclefingers
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
71Tele
Quote
MightyStonesStillRollin50
Quote
71Tele
My theory is this: Jagger called the band together to rehearse with the possibility that the Stones would indeed appear on SNL. This is why they rehearsed hits like JJF and SMU. When it became apparent that the band (Keith) was not in condition to do the performance, he went to Plan B, which was Food Fight, Jeff Beck, etc. Keith must feel awful about this, but I do not believe it was a coincidence that the Stones' rehearsals were in NY right at the exact same time they would have needed to rehearse in order to do SNL. Why would Jagger bother adding Stones activity to an already-packed SNL schedule if this wasn't the plan? Taylor being there at the same time may just have been a coincidence. What a lost opportunity. But if Jagger performs Stones songs with these imposters, it pretty much proves my theory, or why do it?
No offense, but this theory of yours borders on the absurd. No chance this is how it went down.
Maybe it's not accurate - I did say "theory" - but given what we know I see no reason that it should be considered "absurd". If you know how it really "went down", please enlighten us, and I will be happy to revise my thinking.
What do "we" know that leads you to believe that your theory shouldn't be considered absurd? When I say 'no chance" I base that on common sense. It is absurd to think that the Rolling Stones couldn't nail down two songs for an appearance on SNL if that was the goal when they got together. It defies logic. There are other possibilities that make more sense. #1. The rehearsal could be for the coming documentary. #2. Could be just another session toward getting their "chops" down for the coming tour. #3. Could be the first session toward cutting a new album. #3. Maybe they cut a new song to be introduced tonight on SNL or are actually going to perform tonight? Unlikely, but more logical (albeit, slightly) than what you have suggested.
Colonial, sometimes I find you're posts a bit absurd quite frankly.
I am not Colonial. Whomever, that is?
sure...with apologies. (fcbmb)
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
melillo
()
Date: May 20, 2012 00:40
looks great? he looks like a 70 year old man with long dyed hair IMO, with a ton of wrinkles
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
Nimrod
()
Date: May 20, 2012 00:43
Quote
chelskeith
What's the over and under on how many Stones songs will be played tonight.
0.
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
WeLoveToPlayTheBlues
()
Date: May 20, 2012 00:52
Quote
melillo
looks great? he looks like a 70 year old man with long dyed hair IMO, with a ton of wrinkles
He "looks like a 70 year old man"? He's...68, right? That's not 70. What does 70 look like? Jagger? Jagger looks like Jagger at 68. He'll look 70 for him when he's 70, which will probably be exactly what he looks like now, dyed hair to boot.
What does Keith look like? 90? Is that what 90 looks like?
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
corriecas
()
Date: May 20, 2012 00:53
Quote
melillo
looks great? he looks like a 70 year old man with long dyed hair IMO, with a ton of wrinkles
i guess you are very beautiful, half and half
jeroen
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
melillo
()
Date: May 20, 2012 00:57
my mistake because we all know 68 is decades away from 70 right? cant understand why people who dont even know the man take things personally for him
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
Nimrod
()
Date: May 20, 2012 01:06
Quote
melillo
my mistake because we all know 68 is decades away from 70 right? cant understand why people who dont even know the man take things personally for him
Apparently saying he looks like a 70 year old man (which he is), has dyed hair (which he does), and has wrinkles (which he does) is an insult.
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
MightyStonesStillRollin50
()
Date: May 20, 2012 01:09
Quote
Sighunt
Over 48,000 views and over 1000 posts (including mine right now) and the speculation and the postulating continues right up until show time! Wow, if many of you had been around during the Kennedy assasination, you would have had a field day collaborating with all the other conspiracy theorists who came out of the woodwork (LOL)! I don't know about you, but I'm going to be happy when this Jagger SNL appearance is over with...
And to think some would like to ban the speculation threads.
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
flilflam
()
Date: May 20, 2012 01:11
Quote
Nimrod
Today this guy on the street stuck his tongue out at me. I think it's a sign. We all know the tongue is the iconic Stones logo. Stones on SNL tonight.
I was about to wash my teeth this morning and noticed a red coloration on it. We both have seen signs. Stones on TV tonight. LOL
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
WeLoveToPlayTheBlues
()
Date: May 20, 2012 01:36
Quote
Nimrod
Quote
melillo
my mistake because we all know 68 is decades away from 70 right? cant understand why people who dont even know the man take things personally for him
Apparently saying he looks like a 70 year old man (which he is), has dyed hair (which he does), and has wrinkles (which he does) is an insult.
So if you're 18 you're basically 21 then with that thinking. Right. It's easy to get the number right. If he dies tomorrow he still isn't 70.
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
Stoneage
()
Date: May 20, 2012 01:41
Without the hairpiece he would look a lot older...
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
Nimrod
()
Date: May 20, 2012 01:42
Quote
WeLoveToPlayTheBlues
Quote
Nimrod
Quote
melillo
my mistake because we all know 68 is decades away from 70 right? cant understand why people who dont even know the man take things personally for him
Apparently saying he looks like a 70 year old man (which he is), has dyed hair (which he does), and has wrinkles (which he does) is an insult.
So if you're 18 you're basically 21 then with that thinking. Right. It's easy to get the number right. If he dies tomorrow he still isn't 70.
Okay...68. And even at 68, he still looks like an old man with dyed hair. None of the points change.
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
His Majesty
()
Date: May 20, 2012 01:52
Quote
Nimrod
Okay...68. And even at 68, he still looks like an old man with dyed hair. None of the points change.
Yeah, he is what he is and what he looks how he looks and that matches your description.
Just an observation eh.
___________________________
The Brian Jones Experience
Re: Mick Jagger to Host, Perform on 'Saturday Night Live' Season Finale May 19
Posted by:
Nimrod
()
Date: May 20, 2012 01:59
Quote
His Majesty
Quote
Nimrod
Okay...68. And even at 68, he still looks like an old man with dyed hair. None of the points change.
Yeah, he is what he is and what he looks how he looks and that matches your description.
Just an observation eh.
You are absolutely correct. He is what he is. And saying that is not insulting him, despite what some others seem to think. Some people are in denial.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
48yearsaRSfan , 84pk , Alfonz , black n blue , Borncrosseyed , canadian.sway , Eleanor Rigby , Floorbird , Godxofxrock9 , lamothem , liddas , LookoutMountain , mcgeez8 , MidnightRambler1990 , murf3901 , nightmare , nikkibong , OneHit , Paulhanrahan , Quique-stone , RawIguanaCologne , sabata , sarahunwin , SirMuddy , spidey39 , StonesCat , straycatuk , Strike , Thrylan , ts , vintage stone
Guests:
228
Record Number of Users:
54
on June 19, 2013 00:32
Record Number of Guests:
268
on June 19, 2013 01:20
