For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
More ground breaking that it sometimes gets credit for.
While
The good boys wanted to "hold your hand",
The bad boys wanted to "spend the night".
Quote
KeithNacho
I much prefer and love the Still Life version...............pure RS
Quote
24FPSQuote
stones78
A fantastic gem, they were catching up with The Beatles during this period.
But it's something the Beatles could have never pulled off. Even at that stage they couldn't have been as explicit, or expressed it as suggestively.
Quote
Max'sKansasCity
More ground breaking that it sometimes gets credit for.
While
The good boys wanted to "hold your hand",
The bad boys wanted to "spend the night".
Quote
Redhotcarpet
Am I the only one who likes this version:
Quote
Jayce
Man, I love the Stones, but...
Re: "Hand" and "LSTNT:: When it comes to explicitness or naughtiness, I'm not sure we can compare a pop song released in 1963 to one released in 1967. (And please don't throw blues songs from the 20s or some Big Mama Thornton stuff at me; we're talking about these particular white English boys.)
It's like the suits vs. scruffy thing: without the suits, the Stones could never have been scruffy. It's easy to be the rebels once someone has broken down the door for you. It's always been an argument that made no sense to me.
For all those who glory in the Stones bad boy image: the Beatles threatened bloody murder in 1965 - "Run for Your Life" - and were so badass they still got an MBE.
The Stones were middle-class-southern-LSE-Cheltenham-commercial artist-Dartford Mama's boy-climb mountains-with-daddy-Michael-is-wearing-the-correct-footwear-on-tv wimps.
video: [www.youtube.com]
Quote
Jayce
Man, I love the Stones, but...
Re: "Hand" and "LSTNT:: When it comes to explicitness or naughtiness, I'm not sure we can compare a pop song released in 1963 to one released in 1967. (And please don't throw blues songs from the 20s or some Big Mama Thornton stuff at me; we're talking about these particular white English boys.)
It's like the suits vs. scruffy thing: without the suits, the Stones could never have been scruffy. It's easy to be the rebels once someone has broken down the door for you. It's always been an argument that made no sense to me.
For all those who glory in the Stones bad boy image: the Beatles threatened bloody murder in 1965 - "Run for Your Life" - and were so badass they still got an MBE.
The Stones were middle-class-southern-LSE-Cheltenham-commercial artist-Dartford Mama's boy-climb mountains-with-daddy-Michael-is-wearing-the-correct-footwear-on-tv wimps.
video: [www.youtube.com]