Tell Me :
Talk
"It's just some friends of mine and they're busting down the door"
Haha, but don't expect anything new. it'll just be a good old 99 Flake.
Keep up the good work. And don't forget to keep us informed.
- Doxa
You should have said 'Remember to keep us informed'. Now what Superrevvy is going to remember is to forget.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-03-26 07:16 by WeLoveToPlayTheBlues.
There is, for sure there is. When you believe it, you feel it.
Keep On Rolling
- Doxa
That's a really good way of putting it.
You said it well, but as long as monopolistic tour organisors like Nationwide control every single dime and penny you will not see any interest for the fans. I assume that there will be huge meet and greet seating areas, premium seatings and then the far rest, And that'll only happen if they gonna tour at all.
LOL, I love your nickname
Keep On Rolling
It appears "novelty names" have arrived on IORR.
He/she is not such an idiot!!!! That´s true we are all hoping for a RS's youth reaction (both musically and artistically), but the EOMS and SG times are over, it was almost over in 1983. They are in their 70s, what can we hope from them??
Now that would be stupid
Keep On Rolling
Here we say: roek snoedel de doek rom pom pom pom
I guess that means nearly the same...but I'm not quite sure!
Yep
Keep On Rolling
Yes more or less....but it means...delays are dangerous
Not quite yet--only one of the current members so far, I think.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Love is strong..."
byTeafoe
"They"? Only Charlie is over 69.
I always thought that that's the hidden meaning...between the lines...but then, one never stops to learn.
Looking at the photo of Ronnie, I would wager Mick told him he looked to 'Ivy League' for a Stones tour, and they were going with Jeff Beck instead.
Talk about your favorite band.
For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
sweetcharmedlife
()
Date: March 25, 2012 08:09
He's going to do a PPV for it.Quote
Justin
I've stepped out of this thread for a bit...has hbwriter revealed his "scoop" yet?
"It's just some friends of mine and they're busting down the door"
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
mailexile67
()
Date: March 25, 2012 12:43
...Any news about the upcoming studio sessions, when and where it starts?!?
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
Gazza
()
Date: March 25, 2012 13:36
Its not exactly something that tends to be announced in advance.....
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
superrevvy
()
Date: March 25, 2012 14:01
Mick and Keith are probably writing right now, a la Bigger Bang, in NYC or Conn,
with the recording machines rolling. When the full band sessions commence
will depend on when Mick and Keith are satisfied with what they got and are
ready for input from the others.
It has become a very sweet, private, and caring relationship at this point.
No one gains entree, not even Charlie Watts, until the brothers by different
mothers have worked things through.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-03-25 14:32 by superrevvy.
with the recording machines rolling. When the full band sessions commence
will depend on when Mick and Keith are satisfied with what they got and are
ready for input from the others.
It has become a very sweet, private, and caring relationship at this point.
No one gains entree, not even Charlie Watts, until the brothers by different
mothers have worked things through.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-03-25 14:32 by superrevvy.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
open-g
()
Date: March 25, 2012 17:29
Quote
SharksWillCry
dQuote
Justin
I've stepped out of this thread for a bit...has hbwriter revealed his "scoop" yet?
I would be interested in his Rolling Stones "ice cream". I am putting together an article and have not reached the desert status yet. (recipes). However I did make "Keith's Pie."
Haha, but don't expect anything new. it'll just be a good old 99 Flake.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
memphiscats
()
Date: March 25, 2012 18:34
...I know variations of this have been posed before: How 'bout a Warts & All tour? The premise: The Stones do what they need to put on the best show they can, but include their fans...make ticket prices reasonable for their fans...grant their fans access...no buying out the first few rows and planting glamorous-looking non-fans. Seriously, the guys are almost 70 year's old - logically, how old does that make most of their fans? Most likely, the average age of a Stones' fan is probably around 55...there is NO SHAME in age. A lot of musicians embrace their fans and don't glamorize their audience.
I was a bit disheartened after reading the end of Chet Flippo's book, when he says that the Stones (in fact all rock bands) have no clue who their fans are. I know I'm naive but I just can't believe that. YES - the Rolling Stones are a name, a brand if you will - but they exist (as a band) to play music & to play for fans. Do they care more about corporate sponsors? Yes - they need funding and deserve to make a profit but I want to believe there's more to the Stones than that.
I was a bit disheartened after reading the end of Chet Flippo's book, when he says that the Stones (in fact all rock bands) have no clue who their fans are. I know I'm naive but I just can't believe that. YES - the Rolling Stones are a name, a brand if you will - but they exist (as a band) to play music & to play for fans. Do they care more about corporate sponsors? Yes - they need funding and deserve to make a profit but I want to believe there's more to the Stones than that.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
zeus
()
Date: March 25, 2012 19:28
You couldn't phrase it better!
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
superrevvy
()
Date: March 26, 2012 00:44
I have been following "mick jagger" for many years on google news. For the first
time EVER, right now, in this the Stones jubilee year, there have been no news
stories anywhere in the world mentioning "mick jagger" in the last 24 hours.
Which sort of deserves a news story in and of itself.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-03-26 00:47 by superrevvy.
time EVER, right now, in this the Stones jubilee year, there have been no news
stories anywhere in the world mentioning "mick jagger" in the last 24 hours.
Which sort of deserves a news story in and of itself.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-03-26 00:47 by superrevvy.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
angee
()
Date: March 26, 2012 02:31
hb, what was it, no tour this year?
i think you may have more...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Love is strong..."
byTeafoe
i think you may have more...
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Love is strong..."
byTeafoe
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
Doxa
()
Date: March 26, 2012 02:34
Quote
superrevvy
I have been following "mick jagger" for many years on google news. For the first
time EVER, right now, in this the Stones jubilee year, there have been no news
stories anywhere in the world mentioning "mick jagger" in the last 24 hours.
Which sort of deserves a news story in and of itself.
Keep up the good work. And don't forget to keep us informed.
- Doxa
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
WeLoveToPlayTheBlues
()
Date: March 26, 2012 07:16
Quote
Doxa
Quote
superrevvy
I have been following "mick jagger" for many years on google news. For the first
time EVER, right now, in this the Stones jubilee year, there have been no news
stories anywhere in the world mentioning "mick jagger" in the last 24 hours.
Which sort of deserves a news story in and of itself.
Keep up the good work. And don't forget to keep us informed.
- Doxa
You should have said 'Remember to keep us informed'. Now what Superrevvy is going to remember is to forget.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-03-26 07:16 by WeLoveToPlayTheBlues.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
Rolling Hansie
()
Date: March 26, 2012 11:37
Quote
memphiscats
I want to believe there's more to the Stones than that.
There is, for sure there is. When you believe it, you feel it.
Keep On Rolling
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
Doxa
()
Date: March 26, 2012 12:15
Quote
WeLoveToPlayTheBlues
Quote
Doxa
Quote
superrevvy
I have been following "mick jagger" for many years on google news. For the first
time EVER, right now, in this the Stones jubilee year, there have been no news
stories anywhere in the world mentioning "mick jagger" in the last 24 hours.
Which sort of deserves a news story in and of itself.
Keep up the good work. And don't forget to keep us informed.
- Doxa
You should have said 'Remember to keep us informed'. Now what Superrevvy is going to remember is to forget.
- Doxa
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
andrewt
()
Date: March 26, 2012 17:02
Quote
Rolling Hansie
Quote
memphiscats
I want to believe there's more to the Stones than that.
There is, for sure there is. When you believe it, you feel it.
That's a really good way of putting it.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
Grison
()
Date: March 28, 2012 15:23
Quote
memphiscats
...I know variations of this have been posed before: How 'bout a Warts & All tour? The premise: The Stones do what they need to put on the best show they can, but include their fans...make ticket prices reasonable for their fans...grant their fans access...no buying out the first few rows and planting glamorous-looking non-fans. Seriously, the guys are almost 70 year's old - logically, how old does that make most of their fans? Most likely, the average age of a Stones' fan is probably around 55...there is NO SHAME in age. A lot of musicians embrace their fans and don't glamorize their audience.
I was a bit disheartened after reading the end of Chet Flippo's book, when he says that the Stones (in fact all rock bands) have no clue who their fans are. I know I'm naive but I just can't believe that. YES - the Rolling Stones are a name, a brand if you will - but they exist (as a band) to play music & to play for fans. Do they care more about corporate sponsors? Yes - they need funding and deserve to make a profit but I want to believe there's more to the Stones than that.
You said it well, but as long as monopolistic tour organisors like Nationwide control every single dime and penny you will not see any interest for the fans. I assume that there will be huge meet and greet seating areas, premium seatings and then the far rest, And that'll only happen if they gonna tour at all.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
idiot
()
Date: March 28, 2012 22:48
You're all living in the past
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
Rolling Hansie
()
Date: March 28, 2012 23:03
Quote
idiot
You're all living in the past
LOL, I love your nickname
Keep On Rolling
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
Max'sKansasCity
()
Date: March 28, 2012 23:18
Quote
Rolling Hansie
Quote
idiot
You're all living in the past
LOL, I love your nickname
It appears "novelty names" have arrived on IORR.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
KeithNacho
()
Date: March 30, 2012 10:06
Quote
Rolling Hansie
Quote
idiot
You're all living in the past
LOL, I love your nickname
He/she is not such an idiot!!!! That´s true we are all hoping for a RS's youth reaction (both musically and artistically), but the EOMS and SG times are over, it was almost over in 1983. They are in their 70s, what can we hope from them??
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
Rolling Hansie
()
Date: March 30, 2012 10:38
Quote
KeithNacho
we are all hoping for a RS's youth reaction
Now that would be stupid
Keep On Rolling
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
Harm
()
Date: March 31, 2012 00:11
In Holland they say: van uitstel komt afstel....
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
alimente
()
Date: March 31, 2012 01:58
Quote
Harm
In Holland they say: van uitstel komt afstel....
Here we say: roek snoedel de doek rom pom pom pom
I guess that means nearly the same...but I'm not quite sure!
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
Rolling Hansie
()
Date: March 31, 2012 02:09
Quote
alimente
I guess that means nearly the same
Yep
Keep On Rolling
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
Harm
()
Date: March 31, 2012 09:57
Quote
alimente
Quote
Harm
In Holland they say: van uitstel komt afstel....
Here we say: roek snoedel de doek rom pom pom pom
I guess that means nearly the same...but I'm not quite sure!
Yes more or less....but it means...delays are dangerous
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
angee
()
Date: April 1, 2012 01:55
Quote
KeithNacho
Quote
Rolling Hansie
Quote
idiot
You're all living in the past
LOL, I love your nickname
He/she is not such an idiot!!!! That´s true we are all hoping for a RS's youth reaction (both musically and artistically), but the EOMS and SG times are over, it was almost over in 1983. They are in their 70s, what can we hope from them??
Not quite yet--only one of the current members so far, I think.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Love is strong..."
byTeafoe
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
WeLoveToPlayTheBlues
()
Date: April 1, 2012 05:12
Quote
KeithNacho
Quote
Rolling Hansie
Quote
idiot
You're all living in the past
LOL, I love your nickname
He/she is not such an idiot!!!! That´s true we are all hoping for a RS's youth reaction (both musically and artistically), but the EOMS and SG times are over, it was almost over in 1983. They are in their 70s, what can we hope from them??
"They"? Only Charlie is over 69.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
alimente
()
Date: April 1, 2012 20:50
Quote
Harm
Quote
alimente
Quote
Harm
In Holland they say: van uitstel komt afstel....
Here we say: roek snoedel de doek rom pom pom pom
I guess that means nearly the same...but I'm not quite sure!
Yes more or less....but it means...delays are dangerous
I always thought that that's the hidden meaning...between the lines...but then, one never stops to learn.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
Slick
()
Date: April 4, 2012 01:05
far far better pre-later vegas era when they had nothing at all to do with the fans... rock royalty comes with a superior attitude. you would never ever see dylan do a meet-and-greet with a bunch of fat slobs and old hags lol.Quote
memphiscats
...I know variations of this have been posed before: How 'bout a Warts & All tour? The premise: The Stones do what they need to put on the best show they can, but include their fans...make ticket prices reasonable for their fans...grant their fans access...no buying out the first few rows and planting glamorous-looking non-fans. Seriously, the guys are almost 70 year's old - logically, how old does that make most of their fans? Most likely, the average age of a Stones' fan is probably around 55...there is NO SHAME in age. A lot of musicians embrace their fans and don't glamorize their audience.
I was a bit disheartened after reading the end of Chet Flippo's book, when he says that the Stones (in fact all rock bands) have no clue who their fans are. I know I'm naive but I just can't believe that. YES - the Rolling Stones are a name, a brand if you will - but they exist (as a band) to play music & to play for fans. Do they care more about corporate sponsors? Yes - they need funding and deserve to make a profit but I want to believe there's more to the Stones than that.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
superrevvy
()
Date: April 6, 2012 17:22
I think we all missed this March 25 story. Perhaps that's for the best, as it
is quite light on facts...
Ronnie and Mick's Secret Stones Summit
Mar 25 2012 by Nick Dorman, [www.people.co.uk]
SOMETHING wrong, Ron? Rolling Stone Ronnie Wood looks like he didnt get much
satisfaction from a secret summit with bandmate Mick Jagger.
Ronnie had hoped to spend much of the day and finally nail down a reunion
tour for the groups 50th anniversary.
But the guitarist, 64, looked less than happy when he emerged from the
three-hour sitdown with Sir Mick, 68, which Ronnie had exclusively revealed
to The People the night before.
Speaking at a ballet premiere at Londons Coliseum, he excitedly told us: Im
having a great time at the minute. Im not sure what is going on with the
Rolling Stones reunion but Im meeting up with Mick tomorrow. So well see what
happens.
Next day Ronnie looked upbeat as he left his home in a light blue blazer,
yellow V-neck, trainers and trademark shades with a ciggie in his hand.
But when the Stone whose band had a hit with Waiting On A Friend arrived at
Micks home he had to use his mobile to call his pal to let him in. Three
hours later the duo were Out Of Time and Ronnie looked glum as he walked to a
waiting car.
An onlooker said: He seemed a bit downbeat.
is quite light on facts...
Ronnie and Mick's Secret Stones Summit
Mar 25 2012 by Nick Dorman, [www.people.co.uk]
SOMETHING wrong, Ron? Rolling Stone Ronnie Wood looks like he didnt get much
satisfaction from a secret summit with bandmate Mick Jagger.
Ronnie had hoped to spend much of the day and finally nail down a reunion
tour for the groups 50th anniversary.
But the guitarist, 64, looked less than happy when he emerged from the
three-hour sitdown with Sir Mick, 68, which Ronnie had exclusively revealed
to The People the night before.
Speaking at a ballet premiere at Londons Coliseum, he excitedly told us: Im
having a great time at the minute. Im not sure what is going on with the
Rolling Stones reunion but Im meeting up with Mick tomorrow. So well see what
happens.
Next day Ronnie looked upbeat as he left his home in a light blue blazer,
yellow V-neck, trainers and trademark shades with a ciggie in his hand.
But when the Stone whose band had a hit with Waiting On A Friend arrived at
Micks home he had to use his mobile to call his pal to let him in. Three
hours later the duo were Out Of Time and Ronnie looked glum as he walked to a
waiting car.
An onlooker said: He seemed a bit downbeat.
Re: Stones tour pushed back to 2013
Posted by:
treaclefingers
()
Date: April 6, 2012 20:37
Quote
superrevvy
I think we all missed this March 25 story. Perhaps that's for the best, as it
is quite light on facts...
Ronnie and Mick's Secret Stones Summit
Mar 25 2012 by Nick Dorman, [www.people.co.uk]
SOMETHING wrong, Ron? Rolling Stone Ronnie Wood looks like he didnt get much
satisfaction from a secret summit with bandmate Mick Jagger.
Ronnie had hoped to spend much of the day and finally nail down a reunion
tour for the groups 50th anniversary.
But the guitarist, 64, looked less than happy when he emerged from the
three-hour sitdown with Sir Mick, 68, which Ronnie had exclusively revealed
to The People the night before.
Speaking at a ballet premiere at Londons Coliseum, he excitedly told us: Im
having a great time at the minute. Im not sure what is going on with the
Rolling Stones reunion but Im meeting up with Mick tomorrow. So well see what
happens.
Next day Ronnie looked upbeat as he left his home in a light blue blazer,
yellow V-neck, trainers and trademark shades with a ciggie in his hand.
But when the Stone whose band had a hit with Waiting On A Friend arrived at
Micks home he had to use his mobile to call his pal to let him in. Three
hours later the duo were Out Of Time and Ronnie looked glum as he walked to a
waiting car.
An onlooker said: He seemed a bit downbeat.
Looking at the photo of Ronnie, I would wager Mick told him he looked to 'Ivy League' for a Stones tour, and they were going with Jeff Beck instead.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.
Online Users
6853 , alimente , crholmstrom , DandelionPowderman , dishevelmentblues , Domonkos , EddieByword , GS1978 , Heart for Stones , Highwire75 , kish_stoned , kowalski , Lorenz , maradona , midimannz , MoreFastNumbers , Mr.D , NickB , OneHit , pg592003 , polythene sam , rollingon , SlyStoned , thomto , vudicus , Wuudy
Guests:
197
Record Number of Users:
56
on May 17, 2013 21:31
Record Number of Guests:
259
on May 19, 2013 07:53
