Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

Goto Page: 12Next
Current Page: 1 of 2
Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: thewatchman ()
Date: February 8, 2012 21:31

Certainly they will mark the 50th anniversary this summer, but is it possible that we won't see any actual live performances until (at the earliest) January of 2013? Mick has hinted that Charlie's joining the band (in January of 1963) holds at least some significance to him. Also, Bill Wyman didn't join the band until December of 1962.

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Date: February 8, 2012 21:32

Prolly not.

It'l be in 12.

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: corriecas ()
Date: February 8, 2012 21:44

he is not keen, not 2012, not 2013
maybe we need another singer, maybe Keef or ronnie or charlie
hahahahahaha
jeroen

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: StonesTod ()
Date: February 8, 2012 21:58

Quote
corriecas
maybe we need another singer, maybe Keef or ronnie or charlie

let's all just pitch a little in and get a brand new band...

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: Jah Paul ()
Date: February 8, 2012 23:06

Quote
StonesTod
Quote
corriecas
maybe we need another singer, maybe Keef or ronnie or charlie

let's all just pitch a little in and get a brand new band...

Agreed. If the tour is delayed any longer, it may be time to assemble the sons and daughters of the Rolling Stones to take their place. Isn't Brian Jones' son a musician? He could play sitar and dulcimer! It would be great! And just think, the Stones' kids would help secure the band's rightful place as the best group ever!

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: Gazza ()
Date: February 9, 2012 01:11

Quote
thewatchman
Certainly they will mark the 50th anniversary this summer, but is it possible that we won't see any actual live performances until (at the earliest) January of 2013? Mick has hinted that Charlie's joining the band (in January of 1963) holds at least some significance to him. Also, Bill Wyman didn't join the band until December of 1962.

Not this bollocks again. They were the Stones before Bill or Charlie joined. And they will tour in 2012.

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: tipps ()
Date: February 9, 2012 06:55

Yes Gazza they will tour this summer.

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: thewatchman ()
Date: February 9, 2012 08:20

Quote
Jah Paul
Quote
StonesTod
Quote
corriecas
maybe we need another singer, maybe Keef or ronnie or charlie

let's all just pitch a little in and get a brand new band...

Agreed. If the tour is delayed any longer, it may be time to assemble the sons and daughters of the Rolling Stones to take their place. Isn't Brian Jones' son a musician? He could play sitar and dulcimer! It would be great! And just think, the Stones' kids would help secure the band's rightful place as the best group ever!

The Stones kids are no match for the sons of the Beatles. Son of a gun.

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: thewatchman ()
Date: February 9, 2012 08:25

Quote
Gazza
Quote
thewatchman
Certainly they will mark the 50th anniversary this summer, but is it possible that we won't see any actual live performances until (at the earliest) January of 2013? Mick has hinted that Charlie's joining the band (in January of 1963) holds at least some significance to him. Also, Bill Wyman didn't join the band until December of 1962.

Not this bollocks again. They were the Stones before Bill or Charlie joined. And they will tour in 2012.

Well, that's nice to know. Just curious, is there a minimum amount of concerts required to constitute a tour? I mean, at what point do we call it a tour?

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: MKjan ()
Date: February 9, 2012 09:29

Yes, 2. That would mean they went from there to here, one would be the opener and the other the closer.

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: Grison ()
Date: February 9, 2012 09:55

to attract a widespread audience for a Tour you must reach thousands and more thousands of people and not just a few Fan Club members which die to see them again. For the moment there is no big hype about the Rolling Stones on their 50th Anniverairy except in little news on music tabloids.
Only if the media does take up the matter in a very big way, which I doubt because of the Olympics, there might be a chance for the Stones to sell tickets at a big scale. Even then people will not spend money on high overprized tickets. And at last we have the healthrisk of all members of the band not only the 4, but also the musicians who accompagnied the Stones since a long time do not get younger.

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: Rockman ()
Date: February 9, 2012 10:00

.....Mick don't lean ....

ROCKMAN

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: 71Tele ()
Date: February 9, 2012 10:00

No.

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: Ket ()
Date: February 9, 2012 11:26

Quote
thewatchman


Well, that's nice to know. Just curious, is there a minimum amount of concerts required to constitute a tour? I mean, at what point do we call it a tour?

yes, it is 11 concerts

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: tipps ()
Date: February 9, 2012 12:05

Quote
Grison
to attract a widespread audience for a Tour you must reach thousands and more thousands of people and not just a few Fan Club members which die to see them again. For the moment there is no big hype about the Rolling Stones on their 50th Anniverairy except in little news on music tabloids.
Only if the media does take up the matter in a very big way, which I doubt because of the Olympics, there might be a chance for the Stones to sell tickets at a big scale. Even then people will not spend money on high overprized tickets. And at last we have the healthrisk of all members of the band not only the 4, but also the musicians who accompagnied the Stones since a long time do not get younger.

If dates were annoucned tomorrow here in canada they will sell in very fast.

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: stonescrow ()
Date: March 15, 2012 04:12

Quote
thewatchman
Certainly they will mark the 50th anniversary this summer, but is it possible that we won't see any actual live performances until (at the earliest) January of 2013? Mick has hinted that Charlie's joining the band (in January of 1963) holds at least some significance to him. Also, Bill Wyman didn't join the band until December of 1962.

smoking smiley

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: stonescrow ()
Date: March 15, 2012 04:16

Quote
Gazza
Quote
thewatchman
Certainly they will mark the 50th anniversary this summer, but is it possible that we won't see any actual live performances until (at the earliest) January of 2013? Mick has hinted that Charlie's joining the band (in January of 1963) holds at least some significance to him. Also, Bill Wyman didn't join the band until December of 1962.

Not this bollocks again. They were the Stones before Bill or Charlie joined. And they will tour in 2012.

Oh, really.

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: stonescrow ()
Date: March 21, 2012 08:20

Quote
71Tele
No.

2014?

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: The GR ()
Date: March 21, 2012 14:08

He's probably thinking the less he does now the more unlikely it will happen next year and thanking god for that.

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: Gazza ()
Date: March 21, 2012 15:22

Quote
stonescrow
Quote
Gazza
Quote
thewatchman
Certainly they will mark the 50th anniversary this summer, but is it possible that we won't see any actual live performances until (at the earliest) January of 2013? Mick has hinted that Charlie's joining the band (in January of 1963) holds at least some significance to him. Also, Bill Wyman didn't join the band until December of 1962.

Not this bollocks again. They were the Stones before Bill or Charlie joined. And they will tour in 2012.

Oh, really.

Everyone loves a smartarse.

They changed their plans (not for the first time) for reasons they know and you and I dont.

If you think that the band seriously believe they started in January 1963, then youre in cloud cuckoo land.

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: mtaylor ()
Date: March 21, 2012 18:07

Quote
Gazza
Quote
stonescrow
Quote
Gazza
Quote
thewatchman
Certainly they will mark the 50th anniversary this summer, but is it possible that we won't see any actual live performances until (at the earliest) January of 2013? Mick has hinted that Charlie's joining the band (in January of 1963) holds at least some significance to him. Also, Bill Wyman didn't join the band until December of 1962.

Not this bollocks again. They were the Stones before Bill or Charlie joined. And they will tour in 2012.

Oh, really.
You have some knowledge, that could indicate some conserts in 2012? (I mean, good to know)

Everyone loves a smartarse.

They changed their plans (not for the first time) for reasons they know and you and I dont.

If you think that the band seriously believe they started in January 1963, then youre in cloud cuckoo land.

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: Happy24 ()
Date: March 21, 2012 18:23

Gazza's post is from February. I think you are aware of that, mtaylor

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: exhpart ()
Date: March 21, 2012 18:27

They've never struck me as being particularly fussed about anniversaries anyway. In 2002/3 they decided to tour and the theme Forty Licks came afterwards (as opposed to the 40th anniversary coming first). It was a "hook" upon which to hang the hat of a tour and new compilation album. If they play some concerts (and I think they will next year) then they will be billed as 50th birthday concerts. I don't think it will be a massive tour but I can easily see several days in NYC, London etc. The pedants among us may call it a 51st Anniversary...do I care? No.

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: mtaylor ()
Date: March 21, 2012 18:29

Quote
Happy24
Gazza's post is from February. I think you are aware of that, mtaylor
Nope, just saw March 21, sorry about that.

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: stonescrow ()
Date: March 21, 2012 18:39

Quote
Gazza
Quote
stonescrow
Quote
Gazza
Quote
thewatchman
Certainly they will mark the 50th anniversary this summer, but is it possible that we won't see any actual live performances until (at the earliest) January of 2013? Mick has hinted that Charlie's joining the band (in January of 1963) holds at least some significance to him. Also, Bill Wyman didn't join the band until December of 1962.

Not this bollocks again. They were the Stones before Bill or Charlie joined. And they will tour in 2012.

Oh, really.

Everyone loves a smartarse.

They changed their plans (not for the first time) for reasons they know and you and I dont.

If you think that the band seriously believe they started in January 1963, then youre in cloud cuckoo land.

I have said repeatedly that July 12, 2012 is the official 50th birthday of the Rolling Stones. It is no coincidence that the new book is being released on that date. As I have stated before the 50th anniversary year begins on July 12, 2012 and runs through July 11, 2013. There will be lots of "lovely things" during this year long celebration. Recently I sensed that there may not be any actual touring this year and that Mick might be leaning more towards 2013 in that regard. Apparently, "my hunch" was correct. Of course they could surprise us with something earlier, and that would be just fine and dandy. Whatever they were going to do in 2012 was going to spill over into 2013 anyway. The documentary is being released in September. I suspect we will get a new album sometime around Christmas or early in the New Year. Hopefully we will begin to see some live performances early in the New Year. If they come later, then so be it. The good news is that the next 16 months around here is going to be filled with anticipation. I am looking forward to it. As Stones fans it can't get any better.

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: stonescrow ()
Date: March 21, 2012 18:47

Quote
exhpart
They've never struck me as being particularly fussed about anniversaries anyway. In 2002/3 they decided to tour and the theme Forty Licks came afterwards (as opposed to the 40th anniversary coming first). It was a "hook" upon which to hang the hat of a tour and new compilation album. If they play some concerts (and I think they will next year) then they will be billed as 50th birthday concerts. I don't think it will be a massive tour but I can easily see several days in NYC, London etc. The pedants among us may call it a 51st Anniversary...do I care? No.

The 50th anniversary year runs from July 12, 2012 through July 11, 2013. Charlie's 50th is in January of 2013, and the 50th anniversary of their first single is June 7 of 2013.

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: GumbootCloggeroo ()
Date: March 21, 2012 18:51

Quote
stonescrow
I have said repeatedly that July 12, 2012 is the official 50th birthday of the Rolling Stones. It is no coincidence that the new book is being released on that date. As I have stated before the 50th anniversary year begins on July 12, 2012 and runs through July 11, 2013. There will be lots of "lovely things" during this year long celebration. Recently I sensed that there may not be any actual touring this year and that Mick might be leaning more towards 2013 in that regard. Apparently, "my hunch" was correct. Of course they could surprise us with something earlier, and that would be just fine and dandy. Whatever they were going to do in 2012 was going to spill over into 2013 anyway. The documentary is being released in September. I suspect we will get a new album sometime around Christmas or early in the New Year. Hopefully we will begin to see some live performances early in the New Year. If they come later, then so be it. The good news is that the next 16 months around here is going to be filled with anticipation. I am looking forward to it. As Stones fans it can't get any better.
Do you want some kind of medal or something? Geez. Can you toot your own horn some more please?

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: stonescrow ()
Date: March 21, 2012 19:35

Quote
GumbootCloggeroo
Quote
stonescrow
I have said repeatedly that July 12, 2012 is the official 50th birthday of the Rolling Stones. It is no coincidence that the new book is being released on that date. As I have stated before the 50th anniversary year begins on July 12, 2012 and runs through July 11, 2013. There will be lots of "lovely things" during this year long celebration. Recently I sensed that there may not be any actual touring this year and that Mick might be leaning more towards 2013 in that regard. Apparently, "my hunch" was correct. Of course they could surprise us with something earlier, and that would be just fine and dandy. Whatever they were going to do in 2012 was going to spill over into 2013 anyway. The documentary is being released in September. I suspect we will get a new album sometime around Christmas or early in the New Year. Hopefully we will begin to see some live performances early in the New Year. If they come later, then so be it. The good news is that the next 16 months around here is going to be filled with anticipation. I am looking forward to it. As Stones fans it can't get any better.
Do you want some kind of medal or something? Geez. Can you toot your own horn some more please?

Like Rodney Dangerfield, just looking for a little respect. Probably won't get any until the day the Beatles Family comes together all on one stage. Maybe that day I get a big Viking horn and blow into it?



Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 2012-03-21 22:41 by stonescrow.

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: tatters ()
Date: March 21, 2012 23:48

Quote
stonescrow
Quote
GumbootCloggeroo
Quote
stonescrow
I have said repeatedly that July 12, 2012 is the official 50th birthday of the Rolling Stones. It is no coincidence that the new book is being released on that date. As I have stated before the 50th anniversary year begins on July 12, 2012 and runs through July 11, 2013. There will be lots of "lovely things" during this year long celebration. Recently I sensed that there may not be any actual touring this year and that Mick might be leaning more towards 2013 in that regard. Apparently, "my hunch" was correct. Of course they could surprise us with something earlier, and that would be just fine and dandy. Whatever they were going to do in 2012 was going to spill over into 2013 anyway. The documentary is being released in September. I suspect we will get a new album sometime around Christmas or early in the New Year. Hopefully we will begin to see some live performances early in the New Year. If they come later, then so be it. The good news is that the next 16 months around here is going to be filled with anticipation. I am looking forward to it. As Stones fans it can't get any better.
Do you want some kind of medal or something? Geez. Can you toot your own horn some more please?

Like Rodney Dangerfield, just looking for a little respect. Probably won't get any until the day the Beatles Family comes together all on one stage. Maybe that day I get a big Viking horn and blow into it?

For a couple weeks you did a fairly good job of appearing to be an almost sane version of thewatchman. It couldn't last, of course.

Re: Is Mick Leaning More Towards 2013 As Far As A Tour Goes?
Posted by: stonescrow ()
Date: March 22, 2012 03:16

Quote
tatters
Quote
stonescrow
Quote
GumbootCloggeroo
Quote
stonescrow
I have said repeatedly that July 12, 2012 is the official 50th birthday of the Rolling Stones. It is no coincidence that the new book is being released on that date. As I have stated before the 50th anniversary year begins on July 12, 2012 and runs through July 11, 2013. There will be lots of "lovely things" during this year long celebration. Recently I sensed that there may not be any actual touring this year and that Mick might be leaning more towards 2013 in that regard. Apparently, "my hunch" was correct. Of course they could surprise us with something earlier, and that would be just fine and dandy. Whatever they were going to do in 2012 was going to spill over into 2013 anyway. The documentary is being released in September. I suspect we will get a new album sometime around Christmas or early in the New Year. Hopefully we will begin to see some live performances early in the New Year. If they come later, then so be it. The good news is that the next 16 months around here is going to be filled with anticipation. I am looking forward to it. As Stones fans it can't get any better.
Do you want some kind of medal or something? Geez. Can you toot your own horn some more please?

Like Rodney Dangerfield, just looking for a little respect. Probably won't get any until the day the Beatles Family comes together all on one stage. Maybe that day I get a big Viking horn and blow into it?

For a couple weeks you did a fairly good job of appearing to be an almost sane version of thewatchman. It couldn't last, of course.

Shattered!

Goto Page: 12Next
Current Page: 1 of 2


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 202
Record Number of Users: 56 on May 17, 2013 21:31
Record Number of Guests: 259 on May 19, 2013 07:53

Previous page Next page First page IORR home