For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
franzk
Is this the real reason why Megaupload was shut down?
[plus.google.com]Quote
In December of 2011, just weeks before the takedown, Digital Music News reported on something new that the creators of #Megaupload were about to unroll. Something that would rock the music industry to its core. (http://goo.gl/A7wUZ)
I present to you... MegaBox. MegaBox was going to be an alternative music store that was entirely cloud-based and offered artists a better money-making opportunity than they would get with any record label.
"UMG knows that we are going to compete with them via our own music venture called Megabox.com, a site that will soon allow artists to sell their creations directly to consumers while allowing artists to keep 90 percent of earnings," MegaUpload founder Kim 'Dotcom' Schmitz told Torrentfreak
Not only did they plan on allowing artists to keep 90% of their earnings on songs that they sold, they wanted to pay them for songs they let users download for free.
"We have a solution called the Megakey that will allow artists to earn income from users who download music for free," Dotcom outlined. "Yes that's right, we will pay artists even for free downloads. The Megakey business model has been tested with over a million users and it works."
How come I am not surprised at all?
Depositfiles not closedQuote
marcovandereijk
According to on line reports, here's thee toll as of today:
MegaUpload - Closed
FileServe - Closed
FileJungle - Deleting files. Locked in the U.S..
UploadStation - Locked in the U.S..
FileSonic - Closed
VideoBB - Closed
Uploaded - Closed
FilePost - Deleting all material
4shared - Deleting files with copyright
MediaFire - Called to testify in the next 90 days and it will open doors to FBI
They're going insane!

Quote
treaclefingers
Quote
Chris Fountain
Quote
marcovandereijk
Clearly a campaign is started to influence people's perception about the owners of Megaupload.
By showing their wealth we are led to belief they must be crooks. I don't really care about
that. They are business men, they take risks, implore new technologies, find a way to fulfill
others needs. That's worth a reward.
Second, I don't believe the artists are really suffering from what is shared on the internet.
There are even studies that point in the other directio: the more people share on the internet,
the better the artist is selling tickets for concerts and stuff (Report: Ups and downs.
Third, about the metaphore used about the "open shop", after the wind blew the door away:
what the FBI does here is not only destroy the shop with the open door, but shut down the complete
mall so all the good shops are closed as well. They shoot with a shotgun at a gnat in a
kindergarten.
Fourth, a government that is afraid of their people communicating with each other is not
worth to rule the country.
I could not agree more!! Great Post!!!
I don't think this issue is as black and white as you make it. Firstly, if the crimes are actually money laundering and racketeering, I doubt you'd really be throwing your support behind that.
Your second point has merit, but measuring this is difficult. Strictly speaking, I believe artists should be compensated for their work, not ripped off. This has been an issue at least since the development of recording tapes. It's just gotten way bigger since it's possible to swap digital files in seconds. Not sure how you properly address this, but I think it will be virtually impossible for them to stop this behaviour as it is so pervasive.
Third, your analogy may have merit, but it is difficult to know at this point to what extent the criminality pervades the company. I feel bad for customers that used paid services for simply transferring their own files/for business. That said, I wonder what percentage of the business Mega Upload did would be considered legitimate. I suspect that it would not be a large percentage.
Finally, this is not about communicating with each other, it is about sharing files that have rights attached to them....to colour it any other way is being deceitful.
I don't support censorship, and I think the danger with these moves is that we move closer to censorship. However, strictly speaking, this 'police action' isn't about censorship, but about theft.
Quote
Naturalust
Quote
treaclefingers
Quote
Chris Fountain
Quote
marcovandereijk
Clearly a campaign is started to influence people's perception about the owners of Megaupload.
By showing their wealth we are led to belief they must be crooks. I don't really care about
that. They are business men, they take risks, implore new technologies, find a way to fulfill
others needs. That's worth a reward.
Second, I don't believe the artists are really suffering from what is shared on the internet.
There are even studies that point in the other directio: the more people share on the internet,
the better the artist is selling tickets for concerts and stuff (Report: Ups and downs.
Third, about the metaphore used about the "open shop", after the wind blew the door away:
what the FBI does here is not only destroy the shop with the open door, but shut down the complete
mall so all the good shops are closed as well. They shoot with a shotgun at a gnat in a
kindergarten.
Fourth, a government that is afraid of their people communicating with each other is not
worth to rule the country.
I could not agree more!! Great Post!!!
I don't think this issue is as black and white as you make it. Firstly, if the crimes are actually money laundering and racketeering, I doubt you'd really be throwing your support behind that.
Your second point has merit, but measuring this is difficult. Strictly speaking, I believe artists should be compensated for their work, not ripped off. This has been an issue at least since the development of recording tapes. It's just gotten way bigger since it's possible to swap digital files in seconds. Not sure how you properly address this, but I think it will be virtually impossible for them to stop this behaviour as it is so pervasive.
Third, your analogy may have merit, but it is difficult to know at this point to what extent the criminality pervades the company. I feel bad for customers that used paid services for simply transferring their own files/for business. That said, I wonder what percentage of the business Mega Upload did would be considered legitimate. I suspect that it would not be a large percentage.
Finally, this is not about communicating with each other, it is about sharing files that have rights attached to them....to colour it any other way is being deceitful.
I don't support censorship, and I think the danger with these moves is that we move closer to censorship. However, strictly speaking, this 'police action' isn't about censorship, but about theft.
Treaclefingers, I think you articlulate the issue very well here and I agree with you.
Most of these guys have criminal minds AND past convictions. Fraud, embezzlement, insider trading and hacking. Not the kind of businessmen I want anything to do with.
peace
Quote
StreetKidStonesRule
Theres alot of talk here is why the New Zealand Police Department went a bit over the top with sending over 70 officers with shooters and helicopters etc to arrest one man.I think the police here were trying to show off to the FBI agents that come here.Its like WOW!..American FBI agents in our city lets try and impress then.Normally they would probably sort it with a couple of officers.
Quote
whitem8
Quote
StreetKidStonesRule
Theres alot of talk here is why the New Zealand Police Department went a bit over the top with sending over 70 officers with shooters and helicopters etc to arrest one man.I think the police here were trying to show off to the FBI agents that come here.Its like WOW!..American FBI agents in our city lets try and impress then.Normally they would probably sort it with a couple of officers.
Well he did have a panic room and a sawed off shotgun. Took them a few hours to cut him out...
Quote
whitem8
I wonder if Rapidshare is next??
Quote
colonial
Not to many people in New Zealand are to concerned about what Kim Dotcom done really.He's probably more popular than our Prime Minister especially after paying for 500 thousand dollars worth of fireworks for Auckland's New Year celebrations.His generosity is well published in the media but not so much how he got his money that part is sort of sweeped under the carpet.
