For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.
Quote
Blueranger
So tell me, because I can't hear it, what is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Quote
Blueranger
So tell me, because I can't hear it, what is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Quote
Blueranger
I gave A Bigger Bang a spin this morning.
When I reached Streets Of Love I became reminded of how much bashing this song gets here.
Why?
I don't understand it. Sure, it's no Ruby Tuesday, but it's a well-crafted pop song with a nice chours and and I feel it's a highlight on this album.
When I saw it on the last tour, it was one of my favourite moments of the whole show.
So tell me, because I can't hear it, what is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Everybody knows that SOL was the attempt at a radio friendly unit shifter. No doubt about it. It was pushed like that in Denmark also, and I think, everywhere. It just seems that Rough Justice was pushed with more force and in a more traditional way. The commercial push that SOL got seemed like The Stones had sent out the single to many a radio station and told them that this was their new single. The result, of course, was that the radio stations just played the first song on the Cd, or the one that they thought to be most commercially accessible. That was of course SOL and not RJ, and it just goes to @#$%& show that the average Joe, has next to zero understanding for the finer things in life. BTW I have a question regarding the term "Stones-by-numbers": If they made a cover version of a typical Chuck Berry song (like they have done many times), would that be a "Berry-by-Stones-by-numbers"? :-)Quote
Gazza
>That's not entirely true since Rough Justice was packaged with Streets Of Love on a double a-sided single. It was those two songs together
Like I said, 'in most countries'. In the UK, the song that got promoted for radio (it was Radio 2's 'Record of the week') was 'Streets of Love'. I also think it was a number 1 somewhere (was it Spain?). The amount of 'commercial exposure' depended on where you live. I dont think 'Rough Justice' was a hit anywhere.
'Rough Justice' may be just a Stones-by-numbers rocker which was far from being the best song on ABB, but it would have been a far better choice as the 'preview' song to the exclusion of 'Streets of Love'. When that little initially hesitant intro kicks in, you know it cant be anyone else.
Dear? Is there something about your sexuality that you'd like to share with us at this point in time? (You're a guy, right)? :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-)Quote
windmelody
Dear Kent, I agree with you that RJ is a decent rocker from a decent album.
Yeah, but tell that to Mick Jagger. He seems to be the one pushing for commerciality in The Stones, wereas Keith, and probably to an extent Ronnie and Charlie, push for a more rootsy feel. See back in the olden days (you know: When yore was the favourite passtime) Keith did the same push for the roots, and Jagger was in on it. But Jagger was also the guy who wanted new sounds (which is, of course, a bit of a stretch 'cause Keith also searched for new sounds. Case in point: David Dalton's First 20 Years book, page 161 - The entire Keith interview). The Stones always had, and still have that. New and old stuff mixed together. So the dynamics are the same and that's what still makes The Stones interesting. To me anyway. That was a detour!Quote
Gazza
As for the 'radio friendly unit shifter' well, yes, but then artists in their 60s dont tend to shift many units of singles anyway, so things like that are a bit pointless.
That term should enter the English dictionary right now! No discussion. Get it in there NOW!Quote
skipstone
caterwauling chorus