Tell Me :  Talk
Talk about your favorite band. 

Previous page Next page First page IORR home

For information about how to use this forum please check out forum help and policies.

Goto Page: 12345678Next
Current Page: 1 of 8
Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: Blueranger ()
Date: March 25, 2010 12:03

I gave A Bigger Bang a spin this morning.
When I reached Streets Of Love I became reminded of how much bashing this song gets here.

Why?

I don't understand it. Sure, it's no Ruby Tuesday, but it's a well-crafted pop song with a nice chours and and I feel it's a highlight on this album.

When I saw it on the last tour, it was one of my favourite moments of the whole show.

So tell me, because I can't hear it, what is so horrible with Streets Of Love???

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: windmelody ()
Date: March 25, 2010 12:27

It is not horrible, it is a hundred percent Mick Jagger popsong, not typical for the Stones, that might be a reason why many people reject it. It worked pretty well live, but I never listen to it at home, while I enjoy other ABB tracks from time to time.

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: FreeBird ()
Date: March 25, 2010 12:36

Isn't it obvious?

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: colonial ()
Date: March 25, 2010 12:55

I liked the video to it especially the start of it when they walked onto the stage.Was that performed in Canada.

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: Blueranger ()
Date: March 25, 2010 13:31

No it isn't obvious, that's why I ask, FreeBird.

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: Hairball ()
Date: March 25, 2010 13:36

It sounds like a present-day Aerosmith ballad from hell. Or a b-side Jagger solo tune. Horrible!

_____________________________________________________________
Rip this joint, gonna save your soul, round and round and round we go......

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: shortfatfanny ()
Date: March 25, 2010 13:56

Quote
Blueranger
So tell me, because I can't hear it, what is so horrible with Streets Of Love???

If you can´t hear it what do you expect ?
It´s a highlight on ABB for you,fine - no problem.

For others ( include me ) it´s horrible,a shame,crap,whatever....
It´s simply that kind of a lousy pop song one wished never have had a listen to...


Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: Anonymous User ()
Date: March 25, 2010 13:57

how much time do you have ?where should i start ?

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: SwayStones ()
Date: March 25, 2010 13:58

Quote
Blueranger

So tell me, because I can't hear it, what is so horrible with Streets Of Love???

The worst part of the song,IMO is the "Ouh Ouh Ouh Ouh" ......



I am a Frenchie ,as Mick affectionately called them in the Old Grey Whistle Test in 1977 .

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: yorkshirestone ()
Date: March 25, 2010 14:03

Quite like it really. That and Back of My Hand are the only things I still listen to of ABB. Thought it worked pretty well live too

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: gimme_shelter ()
Date: March 25, 2010 14:04

It sucks.

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: Silver Dagger ()
Date: March 25, 2010 14:05

It was amazing in the cool blue night at Berlin's Olympia Stadion in 2006. The song took on a new identity live.

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: Gazza ()
Date: March 25, 2010 14:15

Quote
Blueranger
I gave A Bigger Bang a spin this morning.
When I reached Streets Of Love I became reminded of how much bashing this song gets here.

Why?

I don't understand it. Sure, it's no Ruby Tuesday, but it's a well-crafted pop song with a nice chours and and I feel it's a highlight on this album.

When I saw it on the last tour, it was one of my favourite moments of the whole show.

So tell me, because I can't hear it, what is so horrible with Streets Of Love???

To quote Jagger's own lyrics - it's 'awful bad'.

In concert, it was, as you say, pretty good but on record, its clumsily written mush.


What didnt help was that after keeping us waiting eight years for a new Stones album, THIS (being the first song released to radio stations and the first single in most countries) was what they chose to tell the world that they were 'back'.

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: Filip020169 ()
Date: March 25, 2010 14:23

...Talkin' about "opening Pandora's Box" once again... hot smiley

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: KeithNacho ()
Date: March 25, 2010 15:06

Played live it sounded great....... but is Jagger's 100% stuff

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: duke richardson ()
Date: March 25, 2010 15:22

its calculated, maudlin, derivative, un-Stonesy. plus it sucks.

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: JumpingKentFlash ()
Date: March 25, 2010 15:26

I don't see what's so bad about it either. I know many people hate it, but I don't get why many of the same people liked the live rendition better. It's the same song with the same arrangement. What became better live, if people didn't like it from the beginning? I always enjoyed it, so for me there was never a problem. I like it when Mick is in the mood to write songs like that, even though the result varies in quality (The great SOL compared with the lousy Blinded By Love is a no-contest). Also, as Gaz pointed out, many fans were let down that this was the song they chose to tell the world that they were back. That's not entirely true since Rough Justice was packaged with Streets Of Love on a double a-sided single. It was those two songs together. Not just SOL. As far as I can remember, they got about the same commercial exposure. Rough Justice actually was pushed even more since it was played live through the entire tour, whereas Streets Of Love didn't debut until Europe '06. Moreover, Rough Justice was the first song on the album, and it was played at the Superbowl and at their most attended concert ever, so I think that it was more that song they used to tell the world about their return. And Rough Justice is a humdinger of a rocker. So now that I have succesfully turned the tables on this SOL thread in favor of RJ, maybe this thread will start bashing that song? :-)

JumpingKentFlash

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: Gazza ()
Date: March 25, 2010 15:34

>That's not entirely true since Rough Justice was packaged with Streets Of Love on a double a-sided single. It was those two songs together

Like I said, 'in most countries'. In the UK, the song that got promoted for radio (it was Radio 2's 'Record of the week') was 'Streets of Love'. I also think it was a number 1 somewhere (was it Spain?). The amount of 'commercial exposure' depended on where you live. I dont think 'Rough Justice' was a hit anywhere.

'Rough Justice' may be just a Stones-by-numbers rocker which was far from being the best song on ABB, but it would have been a far better choice as the 'preview' song to the exclusion of 'Streets of Love'. When that little initially hesitant intro kicks in, you know it cant be anyone else.

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: windmelody ()
Date: March 25, 2010 15:50

Dear Kent, I agree with you that RJ is a decent rocker from a decent album.

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: JumpingKentFlash ()
Date: March 25, 2010 15:57

Quote
Gazza
>That's not entirely true since Rough Justice was packaged with Streets Of Love on a double a-sided single. It was those two songs together

Like I said, 'in most countries'. In the UK, the song that got promoted for radio (it was Radio 2's 'Record of the week') was 'Streets of Love'. I also think it was a number 1 somewhere (was it Spain?). The amount of 'commercial exposure' depended on where you live. I dont think 'Rough Justice' was a hit anywhere.

'Rough Justice' may be just a Stones-by-numbers rocker which was far from being the best song on ABB, but it would have been a far better choice as the 'preview' song to the exclusion of 'Streets of Love'. When that little initially hesitant intro kicks in, you know it cant be anyone else.
Everybody knows that SOL was the attempt at a radio friendly unit shifter. No doubt about it. It was pushed like that in Denmark also, and I think, everywhere. It just seems that Rough Justice was pushed with more force and in a more traditional way. The commercial push that SOL got seemed like The Stones had sent out the single to many a radio station and told them that this was their new single. The result, of course, was that the radio stations just played the first song on the Cd, or the one that they thought to be most commercially accessible. That was of course SOL and not RJ, and it just goes to @#$%& show that the average Joe, has next to zero understanding for the finer things in life. BTW I have a question regarding the term "Stones-by-numbers": If they made a cover version of a typical Chuck Berry song (like they have done many times), would that be a "Berry-by-Stones-by-numbers"? :-)

JumpingKentFlash

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: JumpingKentFlash ()
Date: March 25, 2010 16:01

Quote
windmelody
Dear Kent, I agree with you that RJ is a decent rocker from a decent album.
Dear? Is there something about your sexuality that you'd like to share with us at this point in time? (You're a guy, right)? :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-)

JumpingKentFlash

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: Gazza ()
Date: March 25, 2010 16:05

Probably

I dont think RJ is a bad song. Its decent enough without being exceptional. Its a 'standard' Stonesy rocker. (Unlike SOL, I actually preferred the studio version)

Ain't no hangin' matter or anything.

AS for the 'radio friendly unit shifter' well, yes, but then artists in their 60s dont tend to shift many units of singles anyway, so things like that are a bit pointless. May as well stick to the audience you do have instead of trying to appeal to some invisible or disinterested one.

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: windmelody ()
Date: March 25, 2010 16:05

If I adress somebody in written English I often use the word "dear". Dear Sir or Madam.The word dear does not have any sexual content as far as I know.

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: stoneswashed77 ()
Date: March 25, 2010 16:18

don´t know what´s horrible.

love this song.

and want many more like this.

pop is better than rock. and mick is wise enough to know that.

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: mickschix ()
Date: March 25, 2010 16:18

Love the song and I agree, it's much better live; unfortunately, I only saw it performed live once. The audience was totally into it, as I recall. I was pleasantly surprised at that. I think it's the folks who dislike Mick's solo material that complain about this song, you're right Windmelody. It IS a popish tune but so what??

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: skipstone ()
Date: March 25, 2010 16:26

It's not believable to begin with but then again a lot of their songs aren't anymore - lyrically that is. It's trite and pompous to boot - and it's BORRRRING. It's beyond generic - it's flat, it's below average - it's not even pedestrian. Remove this along with Rain Falls Down and Sweet Neo Con and suddenly the album is much better.

Yeah - and it was the trailer? Rough Justice sounds much better blasting out of the speakers than Mick's caterwauling chorus of this asleep and crashed ballad.

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: JumpingKentFlash ()
Date: March 25, 2010 16:30

Quote
Gazza
As for the 'radio friendly unit shifter' well, yes, but then artists in their 60s dont tend to shift many units of singles anyway, so things like that are a bit pointless.
Yeah, but tell that to Mick Jagger. He seems to be the one pushing for commerciality in The Stones, wereas Keith, and probably to an extent Ronnie and Charlie, push for a more rootsy feel. See back in the olden days (you know: When yore was the favourite passtime) Keith did the same push for the roots, and Jagger was in on it. But Jagger was also the guy who wanted new sounds (which is, of course, a bit of a stretch 'cause Keith also searched for new sounds. Case in point: David Dalton's First 20 Years book, page 161 - The entire Keith interview). The Stones always had, and still have that. New and old stuff mixed together. So the dynamics are the same and that's what still makes The Stones interesting. To me anyway. That was a detour! smiling smiley

JumpingKentFlash

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: skipstone ()
Date: March 25, 2010 16:34

The problem is Streets Of Love isn't interesting, it's malignant.

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: JumpingKentFlash ()
Date: March 25, 2010 16:35

Quote
skipstone
caterwauling chorus
That term should enter the English dictionary right now! No discussion. Get it in there NOW!

JumpingKentFlash

Re: Please tell me... What is so horrible with Streets Of Love???
Posted by: T&A ()
Date: March 25, 2010 16:39

a bad song is a bad song is a bad song - live or in studio. SOL is so bad that it makes most averagely bad songs sound good by comparison.

RJ is also a bad song.

Oh, and ABB is a bad album.

And...this is a bad thread.

Goto Page: 12345678Next
Current Page: 1 of 8


Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Online Users

Guests: 1327
Record Number of Users: 206 on June 1, 2022 23:50
Record Number of Guests: 9627 on January 2, 2024 23:10

Previous page Next page First page IORR home